Chun Gongzi has said before that Huawei is the most powerful and imaginative technology company in China at present.
Since its establishment, Huawei has not been listed, has no strategic investors, and has only grown into a leading global information and communication technology (ICT) solution provider, ranking first in the world in terms of communication equipment share, and has made impressive achievements in the field of technology segmentation.
Take the 5G field, 5G technology has a major role in promoting the future of artificial intelligence and the Internet of Things, it can be said that who occupies 5G technology, who is expected to control the commanding heights of future technology.
Looking at the world, in the field of 5G, Qualcomm and Huawei have the right to speak, it can be said that Huawei's 5G technology has a major impetus to China's 5G network.
Although Huawei has made great contributions to Chinese technology, some netizens still believe that Huawei is a company that has grown up relying on "patriotic marketing".
Why do most netizens hold such views? This is related to huawei's previous huawei mobile phones. They believe that Huawei mobile phones rely on "patriotic marketing" to make it bigger. But these people are reluctant to admit how much time Huawei spends on Kirin chips.
Although the current Huawei chip is restricted, Huawei still has not disbanded the HiSilicon team, which may have been sold or directly dissolved if it had been placed in other companies.
Look at some of the so-called tech giants in the country, what are they busy with? Either they are playing finance or they are playing buying vegetables or they are playing games, and they are cutting leeks.
In a sense, what level of development China's science and technology can ultimately depend on whether China can stand at the high end of the world's industrial chain, that is, to see what kind of position Chinese technology companies are in the world.
Chun Gongzi said so many words of praise for Huawei, there are still netizens who will complain that this is just Chun Gongzi's "wishful thinking".
So let's take a look at how CCTV views Huawei as a company. Huawei won the CCTV Top Ten "Heavy Equipment of the Nation" brand: Hongmeng first opened, Kirin was launched!
The award speech said: "In the name of China, we will explore science endlessly by struggle; we will overcome the bottleneck of the industry with the momentum of achievement and rely on our strength; when Hongmeng first opened, the Unicorn came into being, and the sharper the blow, the more brilliant the light emitted; the thick accumulation and thin hair, the belief in China's red, printed the thick ink of scientific and technological independence." ”
Seeing this news, some netizens still think that this is an honor that can be obtained by spending money. What Chun Gongzi wants to say is that you are questioning CCTV, or Huawei?
Huawei's subsidiary accounts for three of China's top ten export companies. Companies like Huawei can make money from Europeans and Americans, how many such companies are there in China? As long as the country has this kind of brand plan, Huawei is not selected, and this kind of selection is not authoritative. Therefore, many netizens still gave full affirmation to Huawei's award, after all, it is really deserved.
Finally, what Haruko wants to say is that no company can be "perfect". Although Huawei has not done a good job in some places, we should not deny huawei's huge contribution to Chinese technology, should we?