I don't know if you have found it, the recent forum is still full of news about Uzi, whether it is Uzi's rank record or Uzi's live performance, or the actual combat situation of Uzi's home team BLG has been talked about by countless water friends, in short, as long as the topic involving Uzi must be extremely hot, interestingly, in yesterday's Tsinghua University and Peking University network public debate conference, Uzi's name was mentioned many times, and has always been used as a negative example, what is this going on?
I believe that many brothers noticed yesterday, yesterday Tsinghua University and Peking University, two top universities representing the highest level of education in the mainland, opened a unique online live debate tournament, and the theme of the debate is "whether e-sports should enter the Olympic Games", everyone knows that e-sports-related projects are selected for the Asian Games is already a certain thing, but the level of the Asian Games is naturally incomparable with the Olympic Games, and it is possible to support Asian characteristic sports when the Asian Games are selected. After all, eSports is indeed Asia's strongest sport, but being selected for the Olympic Games means that the sport is publicly recognized by the Olympic Games.
Many sports are to be selected for the Olympic Games as the goal, e-sports is no exception, and e-sports in recent years the heat of high, so the debate tournament began to attract a warm onlookers, and the brothers watching the debate tournament quickly attracted the basis of the debate, when the opposing Peking University actually repeatedly mentioned the well-known e-sports player Uzi to refute the correctness of e-sports to enter the Olympic Games, the reasons for the opposite side include but are not limited to, Uzi players because of a long period of irregular and unhealthy training methods to overdraft their own body Uzi as a public figure may have a bad impact on teenagers.
Among them, especially Uzi's physical health problems mentioned the most, the other side believes that it is e-sports this inevitable sedentary inactivity and other training habits, resulting in Uzi players losing many normal people should have the ability to move, and the opposite side believes that too irregular e-sports schedule is also the main cause of Uzi diabetes, which conflicts with the basic concept of sports making people positive and healthy, so e-sports can not enter the Olympic Games, more interestingly, the square players did not directly respond to this." Uzi's diabetes is due to training", a rebuttal to this view, but accuses the opposing debater of being partial.
So many onlookers brothers feel that Uzi's diabetes because of e-sports training has become the consensus of both sides of the debater, but in fact, brothers familiar with the disease of diabetes know that this disease is not directly related to e-sports culture, this disease is more related to genetics and personal eating habits, of course, often stay up late and other bad habits will indeed be aggravated, but this does not mean that "participating in e-sports will induce diabetes" This thesis is established, which is basically nonsense. Moreover, most of the leaders of traditional sports are trained under the premise of overdrafting their vitality, which is also inconsistent with the concept of "healthy upwards".
So whether it is a partial generalization or not, or failed to guide people to a healthy lifestyle, summing up e-sports competition is indeed far from the Olympic Games, from the debate between the two sides of the debate we can appreciate the misunderstanding and prejudice of ordinary people about e-sports, this is the need for all e-sports related people to work together to reverse the situation, brothers what do you think about this?