The contrast between the outside and the inside 1.The contrast of the whole and the part is direct; thus the totality of reflection and the immediacy of existence each has its own peculiar independence in this contrast; but when it is

Outside-inside comparison

(1) The contrast between the whole and the part is direct; thus the totality of reflection and the directness of existence each have their own peculiar independence in this contrast; but when they are in the essential contrast, their independence is the unity of their negation.

This is established in the externalization of force; the unity of reflection essentially becomes something else, as force itself transplants into exogenousness; but this extrinsicity also retreats directly into that unity; the distinction between independent forces abandons itself; the externalization of force is but an intermediary in the unity of reflection itself.

At present, there is only one distinction between emptiness and transparency, that is, the image, and this image is the intermediary, and the intermediary is the independent long itself.

Not only is the movement to renounce its own opposing provisions in itself a transition; and on the one hand, the transition from immediacy to his being, which itself is only as established immediacy, on the other hand, every stipulation in its immediacy is therefore already unified with its other, and the transition is likewise therefore totally establishing itself and returning to itself.