In an open interview, Professor Wen Tiejun spoke about some of his individuals who went up the mountain on the farmland.
Although our grain production and area are increasing every year, and we have achieved more than a dozen consecutive increases, some of these increases have been realized by engaging in farmland uphill.
The data is reassuring, but the reality behind it is hard to articulate.
Professor Wen reminded us that many developed coastal cities now use plains and good land for urbanization and real estate development.
Then the area of fertile land can only be allocated to some mountainous areas where the value of real estate development is not high.
But if we look at food security in terms of food security, this is relatively less positive.
Most netizens affirmed Professor Wen's views. They believe that good places produce good food.
Many of the mountainous areas themselves are not highly fertile, and it is difficult for mountainous areas to have large areas suitable for farming.
To a certain extent, this is difficult to implement the use of agricultural modernization machinery, and it also relatively inhibits production.
Although fragmented mountain plots are pieced together into an idealized grain area and yield, there are indeed unsustainable hidden dangers from a long-term security perspective.
Another netizen in Zhejiang appeared and said that it is a short-sighted behavior that the good land around the city is taken to engage in real estate.
For example, in Ningbo, Zhejiang, the new city in the eastern new city of the city, the Binjiang New Area in Beilun, the Binhai New Area, the new city in Ninghai New Town and the southern new city of Yinzhou, etc., are actually taking the original surrounding fertile land to engage in real estate.
For local and residents, this is a win-win situation to some extent.
But they soon found that the cost of their own "eating vegetables" increased a lot more than before.
However, there are also a small number of netizens who think that Professor Wen's remarks are alarmist.
They believe that with the development of agricultural modernization and the progress of science and technology, mountain farmland can also obtain the same yield and quality as the fertile land in the plains.
Since ancient times, the plain areas with convenient transportation and various resource advantages have themselves been the main fronts of urban development and development, which is nothing to be surprised about.
Can't you always take all the good land to farm and drive everyone to the mountain?
Some netizens also took the opportunity to propose that capital and enterprises should develop in poor mountainous areas and promote the development of backward areas.
But business and capital are not stupid. It's like some business owners asking rhetorically,
The ultimate goal of developing us is to destroy us.
So why are we fighting with you? Where money goes is not earned.
Going to backward areas, without profits, it is impossible to mobilize the enthusiasm of the capital market.
Capital has a positive coordinating role in infrastructure construction, scientific research and innovation, and mobilization of social forces.
Looking at the history of war in the modern world, the final battle behind it is the capital and financial power of a country.
If we want the private economy to open up land in backward areas, we must first let people see the benefits and guarantees.
With the formation of the trinity of capital, nation and country, China still has some way to go.
At present, many people are actually still talking about the change of capital, and patriotic capital and opportunistic capital are actually not affirmed and optimistic by the people.