Who is closer to poetry, song, and modern poetry? I think that in order of proximity to poetry, it should be words, songs, and modern poems. Words are closest to poetry, and modern poetry is the furthest away from poetry. Note: The song in this article refers specifically to the loose song.
Words and songs can be seen as close relatives of poetry, and the three have many similarities in rhyme, flatness, confrontation, and structure.
Modern poetry can only be counted as distant relatives of poetry, and the two have nothing to do with each other than rhyme, without any similarities. Now some people even come up with modern poems that do not rhyme, and those who do not rhyme should be directly excluded from the scope of poetry.
"Zi" used to be called "Shi Yu" and "Qu" was once called "Zi Yu", but in the end both were reborn and had independent names, called "Zi" and "Qu" respectively. After dissociating the relationship with poetry, "words" and "songs" have been greatly developed, and reached their respective peaks in the Song Dynasty and the Yuan Dynasty, creating the "Song Ci" and "Yuan Qu" cultures that go hand in hand with "Tang poetry", all three of which are treasures in the treasure house of Chinese culture and emit brilliant brilliance.
Unfortunately, modern poetry is "sweet and stubborn", afraid that it will not survive without "poetry". Thus there is a very interesting phenomenon: the close relatives of the poem, "words" and "songs", have their own names, almost divorced from the poem, while the distant relatives "modern poetry" are trying their best to lean on the "poem".
I often wonder why the close relatives of poetry, "words and songs", are not called poems, but distant relatives "modern poetry" are called poems. I have not been able to think of an answer to this question, I don't know which friend can answer this question?
Think about it, how much does modern poetry resemble "poetry"? Apart from lyricism, the two have almost nothing in common, and the two are originally completely different "poetic styles".
I think that "modern poetry" should be as independent as "words" and "songs", and be separated from poetry. I came up with a more appropriate name for modern poetry: "lyrical long and short sentences", which is more graphic and more conducive to "lyrical long and short sentences" jumping out of the trap and flourishing.
In fact, the essence of this problem is that poetry and poetry are two completely different concepts, and now many people confuse the concepts of "poetry" and "poetry". Poetry belongs to a kind of poetry, and the "lyrical long and short sentences" of words, songs, and rhymes also belong to "poetry". So it is correct to say that modern poetry belongs to "poetry", but it cannot be said that modern poetry belongs to "poetry".
Distinguishing between "modern poetry" and "poetry", the four "poetic styles" have obvious distinctions, which is more conducive to the inheritance and development of poetry art, and perhaps one day it can be the same as Tang poetry, Song Ci and Yuan Qu, creating a new peak period of "lyrical long and short sentences"!
Friends, you should now understand the relationship between "poetry", "modern poetry" and "poetry"? What are your opinions on this article? Welcome to share.