The 17th round of the Chinese Super League continues, with a game in three days, which is a great test for the team, and the competition in the conference system is also a great test for the referee. In the first game in the relegation group, Dalian ren lost 1:2 to cangzhou lions, while Tianjin also lost to Qingdao, and Qingdao also ended its 11-game losing streak.
First, let's take a look at the Tianjin Jinmen Tigers' 1:2 loss to Qingdao.
In the 52nd minute of the game, the referee showed a yellow card, the subtitle first gave Lü Peng, and finally showed that it was Wang Hao, in fact, the referee did not show Lü Peng a yellow card, the subtitle was wrong, just like the 15th round, Li Haixin showed a yellow card, but the subtitles and broadcast did not intend to keep up.
Just saying this is because this VAR is inspected in the background, does anyone think that VAR is still involved? Here, let's talk about the workflow of VAR, first of all, no matter what, the referee first makes a decision, can not not do the penalty and ask the VAR to intervene, in this case, the referee showed a yellow card, the video assistant referee may think that the stampede may involve a direct red card, therefore, the assistant video assistant referee will notify the referee to delay the resumption of the game. That is to say, at this time the video assistant referee is looking back, at this time, the broadcast screen will sometimes be given to the video operation room, in fact, here can not be regarded as intervention, when the video assistant referee inspection found that this is a clear and obvious error will suggest the referee to look back, that is to say, var determines that it is an absolute red card when the referee can prompt the referee to suggest that the referee look back, otherwise it is not allowed to intervene. Remember that only the referee can ask for a review, and the video assistant referee does not have the right to ask the referee to look back, he can only suggest. If the inspection finds that it is not a clear and obvious error, he cannot intervene, that is, the check over we often see in the Premier League and the Champions League, and after the inspection, the VAR is not used to verify whether the referee is correct this time.
Before, we let go of a lot of VAR communication clips, and everyone listened to it to know how to communicate.
We watched the scene in the 62nd minute, after Gao Jiarun released the ball, Liu Jiashen kicked at Gao Jiarun's feet, the referee blew the foul, but did not play the card, we think this is a reckless foul, did not take into account the damage caused to the other party, because before Liu Jiashen got a yellow card, if you show the penalty order to appear, the referee may be out of this consideration!
First, after the Qingdao team member was injured, the referee signaled him to leave the court for treatment, and after the team member was treated, the team member stood on the side of the court to signal to the referee, and the referee made a gesture of not letting him enter the court after treatment. First of all, I don't understand why the players signaled to enter the court and the referee did not let, but only let the game enter after the "dead ball", perhaps considering that the ball is developing near here, and it may be directly involved in the attack after entering the field, but it is also this and it is in the technical area of the Qingdao team, the team official questioned, and then the assistant referee assisted a foul of the Qingdao team, resulting in the team members on the bench who expressed dissatisfaction with the referee's decision, although the game has resumed, but the referee blew the game and warned the players on the bench. This time, the warning was assisted by the assistant referee, and the most likely substitute team member was dissatisfied with the assistant referee's assistance, and the assistant referee heard it, and we believed that the referee's warning behavior was correct, especially after his assistant gave the prompt, this first of all to maintain the dignity of his team. Warnings must be given to officials who question the actions of match officials with words or actions!
In injury time, the Tianjin player fell to the ground in the penalty area, the referee signaled that there was no foul, through the replay, we believe that the physical contact between the two sides is reasonable, and the referee is correct not to award a foul!
After talking about this game, let's take a look at Dalian Renren's 1:2 loss to Cangzhou Lions.
The referee awarded a penalty in this game, and according to the custom, let's first look at this penalty award:
At first, the umpire awarded the goal ball, not the handball foul, this position the umpire is honestly difficult to see, and the referee's running position has been pulled to the outside as much as possible!
Video assistant referee intervened, from the live broadcast given the picture, we can see that the video assistant referee first determined that the ball does not exist offside foul, again to check whether the handball foul, the video assistant umpire will see the situation to tell the referee, suggest that the umpire initiate a review, the referee after reviewing the handball foul, the penalty is awarded. We thought it was the defender moving his hand toward the ball and it was right to award a handball foul.
There was also another intervention in this game, Cangzhou scored in the opening 3 minutes, but the second assistant referee on the flag signaled the ball out of bounds, we think the second assistant referee on the flag is correct, because from the playback point of view, the ball is indeed difficult to judge, var intervention from a three-dimensional point of view to determine that there is no complete qualification, for the assistant referee is indeed very difficult.
As in the game above, such contact is a reasonable scramble for the ball, part of the game, so the referee does not award fouls I think is reasonable.
In the 36th minute, Sun Guowen fell to the ground after the contact with the other party Yang Yun, yang Yun took the lead in occupying the position, this contact is within a reasonable range as we told above, so it should not be punished for fouls.
Finally, let's take a look at zhao Xuri's foul at the last moment of the game, Zhao Xuri and the other side scrambled for the ball, there was a pushing action behind him, after the other party fell to the ground, Zhao Xuri kicked the other party, to be honest, just like the last round of Tianjin and Henan games, the other party fell to the ground and took the other party's head with his foot, this action is the most disgusting, the worst, some people think that this is a violent act, because the feeling is that Zhao Xuri deliberately kicked the other team member without the ball right, in fact, I feel that the other party fell to the ground under the referee did not blow the foul When the opponent fell to the ground, the ball was on its chest zhao Xuri's purpose was still to scramble for the ball, so I think the yellow card warning is reasonable!
However, as a digression, the badge worn by the referee Ai Kun in this game is still the old version of the BADGE of the Football Association.
Let's look at the two matches played in the evening, the relegation team leader Shanghai Shenhua won 4:1 over Chongqing Liangjiang Athletics, and the two consecutive wins of Wuhan finally drew henan Songshan Longmen
In shanghai Shenhua 4:1 victory over Chongqing Liangjiang Athletic, because the gap between the strength of the two sides is indeed a bit large, there is not much controversy in this game, one of which netizens sent a case We take a look:
This is the same as the previous interpretation, and Zhao Mingjian's fall is more fake, the other party does not foul at all, to tell the truth, it is good not to blow his fake fall.
In fact, the biggest focus of this round of relegation group matches is the match between Henan Songshan Longmen and Wuhan, and the last round of Henan was awarded a spurted penalty by the referee. The two VAR interventions in this game are invalid once to award the goal invalid, one is valid, of course, the "injured party" is the Wuhan team, let's take a look at the interpretation of the controversial penalty in this game:
First, take a look at the goal that López was ruled invalid after scoring in the 44th minute:
To be honest, this millimeter-level offside is too difficult for the assistant referee, and the assistant referee also makes good use of the delayed flag raising, and finally determines the offside foul under the line of the video assistant referee! In addition, Kalanga's goal was also recognized as valid with the assistance of VAR.
In the 15th minute, Wuhan opened a corner, the ball directly hit the arm of Henan team Gu Cao popped up the goal line, the assistant referee's vision was blocked and did not give the goal ball or corner ball penalty at the first time, after the referee gave the goal ball penalty, the assistant referee signaled the goal ball with the flag.
Gu Cao's handball is similar to the handball of Guangzhou and Wang Gang of Beijing Guoan in the 15th round, the arm did not make the body unnaturally expand, it belongs to the natural position, so the handball foul should not be awarded, but this ball should be a corner ball instead of a goalball, because it is against the referee, the referee may not find that Gu Cao's arm touched the football.
Also, if you like our article, please click "Watching" and "Like", thank you!