[Interpretation of the Chinese Super League] and the law enforcement method of thin mud is not a high emotional intelligence performance!

Football referee is the "judge" on the football field, accurate judgment is the core of football refereeing work, but also the embodiment of fairness and justice, it transmits the spirit advocated by football, is a favorable guarantee for the benign development of football, but also the premise of maintaining the seriousness of rules and the authority of referees.

The referee should make corresponding handling and judgment of the situation in the game according to the rules and regulations, combined with the common sense of football and the spirit of the rules, accurate and strict is closely related, strict is not strict, heavy, not iron-faced ruthless, strict is the clear provisions of the implementation of the rules, strict is an accurate supplement, accuracy is a strict premise.

The referee's decision must be reasonable, "reason" refers to the actual situation of the game, and "reason" refers to the rules of football competition. The two are not contradictory, but an organic combination of different perspectives. The referee must make a reasonable decision based on the nature of the match, the atmosphere of the game, the intensity of the game, the time period of the game, the area where the match takes place, etc.

Many referees boast that in addition to learning seventeen chapters, the most important thing is to learn "eighteen chapters" well, but the premise of using eighteen chapters well is to learn the first seventeen chapters, some have not learned to stand, they have to run, and it is definitely you who falls. In addition, many referees and sludge law enforcement methods always feel that this is a manifestation of high emotional intelligence, but in fact, it is not, on the contrary, this is a kind of blasphemy against the rules of football competition, disrespect for football!

Yesterday in the 22nd round of the Chinese Super League, Shanghai Port lost 3:4 to Zhejiang team, although the six-game winning streak was suspended, but still led by 14 points, with eight rounds remaining, it was actually only a matter of time or a few rounds earlier. Originally, the credibility of the Chinese Super League and the credibility of the referee fell to freezing point this season, and there are always some fans who conspirely believe that football will win the championship in this year, so the referee's penalty in each round of the Harbour game is very easy to attract everyone's attention. As a self-media related to referees, in fact, I want to say that I can understand the league referees, just like Mai Mai Tijiang breathed a long breath after blowing the match between Shandong and Chengdu, in fact, the referees have also been under a lot of pressure, and the society should also give the referees greater tolerance and understanding. Therefore, as a referee, although you can't let the fans' discussion influence your own judgment, you must also predict whether your own penalty will be controversial, rather than dealing with it with the attitude that the judgment is judged and the fans do not understand the rules. If this vicious circle continues, it is definitely the entire referee circle that hurts.

The referee on duty awarded two penalties, one on each side, and fans said the scale was relatively uniform.

So should the above be awarded a penalty? Before analyzing, let's take a look at a case of the uniform scale given by the Football Association this year

I believe that everyone has seen this case in the unified scale, the football association defines a reasonable scramble, compared to this video above Zhejiang No. 5 team members seem to be fighting for the position is not as obvious as this, and there is indeed a pushing action, but the strength of the action is not large, we think this should be within a reasonable range of scramble, the force used is also within the normal range, so the game continues the most appropriate. However, the referee's penalty cannot be said to be completely wrong, and the referee's penalty decision is indeed not a clear and obvious mistake.

VAR still did not intervene after watching for a long time, of course, we don't know if we did not intervene, did VAR feel that the referee's penalty was not a clear and obvious mistake, or did he also approve of the referee's decision? However, looking at VAR for so long, I feel that VAR feels that the referee's penalty is not a clear and obvious mistake.

Then look at the penalty kick of the Zhejiang team, the referee awarded a very firm penalty, and through the replay, Jiang Guangtai's foul was still relatively obvious. However, it may be this stoppage-time penalty shootout that somewhat affects the referee's subsequent decision.

In the 10th minute of injury time, Wu Lei fell again in the penalty area, but the referee signaled that there was no penalty, which caused considerable dissatisfaction among the Harbour players, and Li Shuai was also shown a yellow card by the referee for questioning the referee. To be honest, at this point in time, especially at the home of Harbour, and Harbour is still behind, the referee withstood the pressure and still did not award a foul, in this point I still agree with the referee to award a penalty, for this contact penalty, how many Wu Lei has to "create" in a season.

A minute later, Li Shuai's kicking action to the wrong person caused a conflict between the two sides, and the referee's reaction seemed to be slower than that of the first assistant referee Shi Xiang, who rushed over and hugged the Zhejiang team members at the first time to avoid a physical conflict. In fact, I admire Shi Xiang very much about these assistants, firstly, I know my positioning, and secondly, I dare to defend the referee. When many referees leave the field after the game to create players to block, as long as Shi Xiang is there, he is the first to block in front of the referee, although his height also makes some players a little jealous!

After the situation subsided, the referee did not discipline Li Shuai, but instead gave a yellow card to the doubtful Zhejiang team member, which became the main point of attack for fans after the game. To be honest, I don't understand why Li Shuai was not given a yellow card, did he think that Li Shuai's action was not solid, and then the referee wanted to shake Li Shuai's hand, but was rejected by the opponent. Steady, mentally agile and confident and decisive are the guarantee links in the process of awarding fouls by referees. No matter how difficult the game is, the referee should face it bravely. Fouls do not cease to occur because of the cowardice of the referee, chaos does not become orderly because of the referee's sluggishness, and the prestige of the referee is not upheld because of his conceit. Referees need warmth to enforce the law on the field, but they also need to maintain the dignity of a judge.

Zhejiang's header scored, VAR intervened, and after the referee looked back, the penalty was awarded. This is also some conspiracy theory fans who say VAR managed to blow off Zhejiang's goal. This intervention is to see if the Zhejiang No. 17 player is offside for a foul. In the moment Frank's header, the No. 17 player is in an offside position, so in order to award him an offside foul, it is necessary to determine whether he has made a mistake that affects the opposing team's ability to handle or handle the ball, or interferes with the goalkeeper's vision and affects his handling of the ball.

Yan Junling's position can be seen very clearly for the incoming ball, and the No. 17 player is a turning action, did not interfere with him, his position is to affect Yan Junling's line of sight, because the ball is obliquely topped, for its line of sight interference is also limited, the referee is correct to award the goal.

However, the biggest problem with this goal was the intervention of VAR, who intervened to think that it was a clear and obvious mistake for the referee to award the goal effectively, or that the referee omitted the award for the offside foul. But from either point of view, I don't think the non-penalty foul was a clear mistake or a serious omission. In this case, for offside interference, it is actually good for the referee to have the assistant help to look back when looking back, because the position of the assistant and the penalty for offside sometimes have an advantage over the referee.

For this red card, the referee also decided decisively and correctly. Intentional handball ruins the opponent's scoring chances.

In fact, throughout the game, the referee's judgment of several key balls did not make much mistake, and even many of them were decisive and correct, but why did it trigger criticism from fans after the game? In addition to the harsh public opinion environment, the overall ability of referees to control the game needs to be strengthened.

The referee came over very decisively to show the red card, and there was no problem with the penalty, but Wu Lei still questioned the referee, and the referee did not have better management and control over this behavior. Although some of Ma Ning's enforcement style is criticized, his control of the game does require some referees to learn, and overindulgence of players is actually disrespect for football!