The new variety show "Director Please Advise" has been broadcast, this program is not the test of the actor's acting skills, but the competition of the directors' coaching level, which is the first domestic test of the director's variety show, most of the participating directors are newcomer directors, or less famous directors who need to prove themselves.
Among all the directors, Bi Zhifei is an alternative existence, because his film "Pure Heart, DreamIng Showbiz" has a rating of only 2.2 on the Internet, which is the lowest-rated film, so he is called the "King of Bad Films", and in the director's selection of actors, no actor wants to cooperate with him.
So he can only choose actors on the sidelines for shooting, I don't know if these three actors were selected by himself, or the program team, in short, these three actors are very problematic, they actually openly questioned the director, especially one of the actresses, no matter how Bi Zhifei arranged, she refused to cooperate, and also changed the script to think that the director's arrangement is meaningless.
The actress so disgusted with the director, but also think that she has some excellent acting skills, but when this work is presented, there is nothing amazing, the acting skills of the three actors are ordinary, the performance traces are very heavy, it is not natural at all, originally Bi Zhifei's coaching ability is average, and the actors do not listen to the arrangement of casual performance, it is conceivable that the quality of this work will not be very high.
After the work was broadcast, Bi Zhifei was verbally criticized by producers, film critics, and actors, and accepted the "trial" on stage for a few minutes, which may be Bi Zhifei's most difficult moment, for everyone's questions and doubts, Bi Zhifei gave an answer, it is undeniable that Bi Zhifei's reply is not perfect, just like Li Chengru said, he does not accept any opinions, very stubborn.
Bi Zhifei was shelled on the stage is very pitiful, but his stubbornness is also "hateful", but no matter what Bi Zhifei's ability is, this work is not qualified, it should not become a springboard for others to show off their knowledge, there are not many people who seriously analyze the work, and everyone is talking off-topic and showing off their knowledge.
For example, Meng Zhong, a professional film group, he is a professor at a film school, he is very angry when he hears Bi Zhifei's interpretation of the original work, he thinks that Bi Zhifei's interpretation is completely wrong, so he made a more detailed interpretation of the work, which was originally something that was discussed with each other, but he did not allow Bi Zhifei to refute, always interrupting Bi Zhifei's speech, which is not a discussion but a preaching.
Another example is Wang Xudong of the professional film identification group, who made a very in-depth interpretation of Bi Zhifei's works, and it was "Billy Wilder" and "Hollywood three-shot method" that was very professional, and he also asked Bi Zhifei on the spot whether he had seen Mr. Fei Mu's other works, and asked the other party to say a few shots that reflected oriental aesthetics.
These two so-called experts do have a lot of profound film knowledge, but they only care about showing off their knowledge, ignoring the feelings of the audience, they are discussing the movies and shooting methods of one hundred and eighty years ago, most of the audiences they say have not seen, or even heard, in a variety show to discuss such a long time, there is really no point, anyway, he said what no one understands.
It can be said that the scene has become a debate competition, it seems that making Bi Zhifei dumb is a very remarkable thing, everyone wants to say two sentences to show themselves, how little li Chengru on this occasion, I thought he would bring a sharp comment, but I did not expect his evaluation to be a large double standard scene.
Li Chengru's first sentence when he came up was: Everyone ignored a problem, this work is not his at all, we are all fooled by him.
Li Chengru means that this is not Bi Zhifei's work, but a remake. But the problem is that this variety show was originally the director's remake of the classic IP, and it was not for the director to come up with original works to show, Bi Zhifei's choice of work is "Spring in a Small Town", Li Chengru said that this is not his work, but other directors have also made adaptations on the basis of classic IP, and Bi Zhifei is the same.
Since everyone is the same, how did bi Zhifei start double standard here?
Li Chengru also said that Bi Zhifei was incapable, and he could not answer the questions of others, this sentence was too wrongful to Bi Zhifei, the eyes of the masses were shining, and Bi Zhifei was able to answer every question with ease.
It's just that his answer failed to satisfy those so-called experts, Bi Zhifei's only fault is that he was too weak, in the face of the actress's dislike, he did not show the majesty of the director, in the face of the criticism of the film critics, he did not show confidence, if others interrupt him, he can say toughly: Why do you interrupt me, do you understand how to respect others.
If Bi Zhifei could be a little tougher, these people would not unscrupulously show their "talents" on him.
Of all the reviews, the most disappointing is Li Chengru, who is too double-standard, saying that Bi Zhifei's works are very old and outdated in modern society, but this "Spring in a Small Town" is a work from 1948, and if it is adapted into a modern part, I am afraid that the non-parliamentary suffering will be even greater. Surely someone will say that Bi Zhifei spoiled the classic.
To put it bluntly, what Bi Zhifei does is wrong, when he competes, everyone thinks about how to refute him and use him to show his knowledge, poor Bi Zhifei certainly has "hateful things", but he should not become a springboard for others to show off their knowledge. Maybe his abilities are not good, but he should also be treated with the most basic respect.