Adam and Eve came out of the Garden of Eden before they began to create the book, and when they saw the fruit of wisdom, they had planted a seed in their hearts yearning for freedom and change, hoping to change the status quo through continuous attempts. The greater temptation for them to steal the "forbidden fruit" is to escape the wisdom of the primitive environment to evolve.
Similarly, Moses escaped from ancient Egypt to escape slavery. When we are in a primitive environment, we can only go with the flow, lack of creativity, and cannot contribute more knowledge. Therefore, the primitive environment is like in the womb for us, which can only absorb the nutrients of the mother and does not participate in the overall living system. Only by escaping from the original environment can we change and evolve.
Regarding the idea of fleeing, it is precisely a way of disengagement. If we divide the disengagement method into two ways:
One is active, that is, to flee;
The other is passive, which occurs when the mother stops supplying nutrients and thus completes detachment;
According to human evolution, if you want to upgrade changes, you need to actively flee. Only when human beings escaped from the primitive barbarism of animals can they create a civilized society, so that the culture of cities, writings, and buildings can emerge. This culture is not only nurtured by rich rivers and grasslands, but also by the courage of human beings to dare to escape from the "primitive environment". Only by constantly escaping the collision can we give birth to a more valuable and meaningful ideology and culture, thus promoting development.
In today's sociological concepts, the word original family is very familiar to everyone, it is easy to find it from a variety of psychological and emotional texts, the original family is often misunderstood: people think that the original is the problem caused by living in a large family.
In fact, the word primordial represents a state of dependence, that is, the parents are no longer able to support the supply of any one of your material or spiritual lives. But either you can't get rid of it materially, or you can't get rid of it spiritually.
Thus forming a insecure way of dependence, resulting in ideological rigidity, encountering things that need to be innovated in work and life, there is a state of powerlessness. This state of affairs thus constructed is called the adverse effects of the original family. Some people, even though they are half the world away from their parents, still have a strong spiritual dependence, so psychologists often say that this person is influenced by the original family. So how to solve this problem?
We often test ourselves for depression, and the results surprise everyone, with almost 80 percent of those who took the test depressed and 10 percent being severely depressed.
Although these people with severe depression who participated in the test also developed nervous emotions, they returned to a "normal" life after a few days, so the key problem was this "normal" subjective consciousness.
On further understanding how "normal" subjective consciousness disturbs us in doing things. Let's delineate a thing, such as an ongoing soccer match, which can only be played in the arena, and there are scopes and rules, in a competitive environment, the two sides are against each other, there are losses and wins.
Today for a certain team, you think they will win, and they think they can win. It turned out to be a loss, why? Because the players' collective subjective consciousness is that "normal" will win, they do not pay attention to the objective rules of the game, the weather, the reaction of the fans, the performance of the opponent players, the style of the referee, etc.
So "normal" will win is a kind of subjective entry into the original environment thinking. In competitive competition, objective things change too much randomly, so the results of the development of things are affected by the interaction between subjectivity and objectivity, and when the subjective situation is unchanged, the small changes of objective factors eventually lead to failure. How do you resolve this state?
Only when you step out of the scope of "normal" subjective thinking can you know how the original objective factors have changed. For example, the depression mentioned above, you have to understand what are the specific symptoms of depression that you detect? For example, insomnia, irritability, hate for certain things, etc., then you have to "repair" these things, the process of repair is to actively escape the control of these things, after the repair we look back at the process of depression, in order to accurately analyze which objective environmental changes led to the initial depressive symptoms. For example, changes in feelings, changes in the tone of communication, etc. The so-called bystander Qing is this path, and if you want to have enough knowledge of subjective symptoms and objective factors, you have to "jump" out to see things.
【Summary】 Whether it is the original family, depression, or failure theory, we must first locate the scope, find the factors of subjective thinking, and then actively escape the control of these factors, and finally conduct reconsidering to find the objective influencing factors of the whole event. These objective factors are the most difficult to find the underlying cause.
People living in this world can't help but make a lot of contracts for themselves. Most of them are related to their own lives, we will advocate timely pleasures because of our limited lives, and the formation of marriages and the raising of offspring are also mixed with personal selfish thoughts. But is there a contract that can transcend the limits of life? Definitely there.
When we are detached from the matrix and thus acquire thinking, in continuous growth, the energy of our thinking is dedicated to nature.
When life is over, our bodies are still devoting energy, and it is formulating a process of returning to nature. And it's not the process of sucking up energy like it was in the womb.
So from a material point of view, death is also a creative process, an end point and a beginning. So in addition to matter, what are the new changes, as follows:
From the perspective of realism to scientific considerations: in the process of moving towards death, genes will gradually evolve. Such as "Evolution";
From the perspective of spiritual culture: if the thinking energy released before death is huge, it will have a strong spiritual influence after death, making the spirit "immortal". Such as the Tao Te Ching;
From the perspective of philosophy's deep study of minimalism: our process of understanding the world is also shaping the world. If the body disappears, is there an energy body, and this energy body in turn affects the objective environment of our cognition, that is, the creation of the "dream" in which we live;
I image this rebirth process as a rabbit hole, like the crossing in Alice in Wonderland, where we enter another objective world. And here it also causes us to change the original subjective world, which is an evolution of escaping from the original environment. So call it a new or starting point.
Whether it is from the genesis of Adam and Eve or our pursuit of the spiritual world, cognition has no boundaries.
Because when a new life is in the matrix it needs energy, and this energy comes from nature, and natural energy comes from material, spiritual, genetic, philosophical changes (a kind of "Tao"), so we need to constantly create matter (procreation), creative spirit (free thinking), evolutionary genes (adapting to the objective environment).
So in the world we live in, the most terrible thing is to face something with boundaries. Even a piece of wood has no boundaries, it can be made into furniture, furniture can be used for decoration, it can also be used to bag items, it can also be burned, turned into charcoal, sunk into the mud and converted into other energy sources, and then used. This is especially true in the spiritual aspect, where a book and a theory need to be constantly superimposed and modified to become the knowledge we need. Once we encounter something or spirit with clear boundaries, we must take the initiative to flee and change the status quo.
Recall our growth after escaping from the primitive environment: for example, we always make mistakes at work, simply leave our jobs, go to another company, but still make the same mistakes. So before we flee, we have to identify the pristine environment. We are fleeing from the subjective and objective environment that does not correspond, and leaving the job cannot change your subjective consciousness, so when changing the objective environment, the first corresponding change to the subjective environment is the real escape. Eventually we will evolve into more advanced professions. And after such a process is iterated over and over again, we become experts in certain aspects.
The same is true of being a human being, and the ancients often talked about "saints" and "gentlemen", all of which were in contrast to different primitive environments. When we, as ordinary people, see the "saints" see the simplicity, we do not understand why they have no feeling for material life. As a "saint", when you look at ordinary people's thinking and actions, you can quickly know the level of his subjective cognition, judge what he does, and formulate the moral norms of society.
In the same way we look at artists, novelists, thinkers, and poets with all sorts of primitive circumstances as judges. For example, Chinese painting artists, they use rice paper to paint, the brush stroke subjective operation and the objective and sensitive cooperation of rice paper The effect is ever-changing, and those who can master these skills can be called Chinese painting artists.
No matter which category we think about, we need to constantly pursue higher realms, constantly detached from the existing primitive environment, in order to move towards true evolution.