From "An Andalus Dog" and "The Golden Age", it is said that Buñuel is shallow

Since there have been movies, when it comes to film masters, Buñuel may always be a presence that cannot be ignored. The Spanish national treasure film director, from "An Andalus Dog" and "The Golden Age", has used surrealist photography techniques, perfectly integrating religious and social hypocrisy into the themes he expresses. There are more than 32 famous works in his lifetime, and religion and human desires are always the themes of expression.

Later generations say that in fact, "An Andalus Dog" and "Golden Age" are the mothers of all the subsequent films, and the ideological themes of the later films are born from them. Of course, this is also suspected of over-interpretation by later generations, but in the thirties, film art had just entered the public eye, and Buñuel was able to give that profound and grand thing to this flowing picture, which was enough for later generations to say non-stop! I only looked at Buñuel systematically at the end of last year. "An Andalus Dog" and "The Golden Age" are still silent film eras, and what is expressed is indeed very surreal, and the film at that time should be completely treated as a kind of art. These two films also contain too many things, and you can only feel one or two, and you can't say a very profound doorway. "Immeasurable Land" is a documentary, but the age is long, and the picture quality of the b station is very bad, so I did not look closely. "The Forgotten People" is similar to Kore-eda's "Nobody Knows", and the main resources and rights of society are too pitiful for the lower classes. To be happy and decent, one must strive to reach the most basic class recognized by society.

When I saw Nazarin and Villitiana, I entered Buñuel's expression and was completely captivated by him.

Both of these books are about doubting religion, and the hypocrisy of religion is cleverly and deeply excavated by him. The blind goodness of Nazarin and Veritina, they have no power to fight back against ordinary evil in reality. The goodness preached by religion, the white lotus, the blind tolerance also seems foolish. The ultimate thing that these religions seek is indoctrinating, and they will be defeated by evil and will have to endure the ridicule of evil. The good and evil of society must be guaranteed by the legal system, and without these coercive things, human nature will slide to the evil side.

Watching these two films, I think of a previous exhibition by a foreign female performance artist. She was just standing naked in the public eye, at first people just commented, then some people laughed slightly, then some people began to graffiti on her, slowly began to paint on her with some sharp objects, and finally many people unscrupulously insulted her body. This exhibition completely records the whole process of human nature's transformation from good to evil. Therefore, if the masses are allowed to express their democratic freedom without scruples, society will not become better, but will become populist and even street violence. Today, some places or countries are in chaos and miasma, and a large part of it is the result of blind pursuit and imitation of liberal democracy.

On the subject of religion, Buñuel also has a book, Simon in the Desert, which satirizes Christian asceticism and deceptiveness.

Desire is part of human nature at all times, and it even plays a decisive role in the good and evil of human nature. Buñuel's most famous exploration of human desires is probably "Daytime Beauty" and "The Hidden Purpose of Desire", and "The Prudent Charm of the Bourgeoisie" is also one. "Daytime Beauty" let me see that every woman probably lives in the heart of a fox spirit, the whole movie is a nasty spring dream made by the heroine, the concept is also very clever, who can imagine the noble and dignified heroine, how can there be such a desire in the heart! But when you think about everyone's private parts, there are probably some strange and incomprehensible little hobbies. "The Obscure Purpose of Desire" is about the story of the desire of an old man, and the narrative of the film has always been from the perspective of an old man, and it is inevitable that there will be Rashomon. Men and women have been hurting each other, and then missing each other, the girl has not let the man get her, it seems to give people the feeling of holiness, but immediately something overturned her, saying that those are all disguises, men want to cut off this feeling, but the thought can not stop. The reason for this asymmetry is that I ended up classifying it as an age difference, women have too much to choose from, and men panic about their age, so young is the biggest capital. There is no right or wrong in the intertwining of male and female emotions, once tender and sweet, it seems that the vicious revenge at that time is also the deep hatred of love, if it is angry again, but the hand-to-hand love is hypocritical. Or the most vivid image summed up in our old adage "bedside fight bedside and". At the end of the film, men and women embrace each other and reconcile, but in the blink of an eye, they are angry at each other. Marriage and love are all hurting each other! Then take pleasure in the damage! "The Prudent Charm of the Bourgeoisie" pushes people's hypocrisy and falsehood to a deeper level, all of man's daily life is a performance, it is an illusion, and society is a big stage, but it is more exciting than who performs.

The master is the master, and all the things expressed are deeply serious and lifelike, making people quickly feel a sense of substitution, and sincerely praising the director's kind of life allegorical things.

At the current stage of film development, the perfection of all aspects is estimated to be stronger than in the past era, but why are there few directors who express this kind of expression now?

I read a sentence the other day. I have never heard of Luo Dayou, and I seem to feel that "Two Butterflies" sounds quite good. I've learned to paraphrase it now, and without seeing things from Buñuel and other older filmmakers, we don't know how ignorant our films are. The height and breadth of our aesthetic tastes are determined by our vision. Watching movies is a long process, whether it is the producer or the fans for the film industry is a drop in the ocean, only by using themselves as a sponge to absorb more of the past movie bits, in order to really find the fun that the movie brings to us, in order to really find their own position!