Wen 丨 Cao Jingming
Wang Shuo criticized Lu Xun: Without thought, it is impossible to rely on essays and short stories alone, and only by forgetting them can we make progress
Welcome to leave comments and exchange views on Lu Xun!
Recently, Mr. Lu Xun's grandson "Zhou Lingfei" was pushed into the hot search because of some interview remarks, saying that he became the descendant of the great literary hero and how he lived under the influence of his grandfather.
Zhou Lingfei's remarks caused a great controversy on the Internet, this controversy has nothing to do with Mr. Lu Xun, but only for Zhou Lingfei personally, some are still very mean, saying that Zhou Lingfei has inherited some of Mr. Lu Xun's appearance, is useless, has been eating the old Ben, and now he is still licking his face and eating enough to scold the mother?
Realistically speaking, the remarks of this part of the melon-eating masses will inevitably appear a little harsher.
At least as far as the author is concerned, it is not so much that Zhou Lingfei is full of scolding women, but rather Versailles, which is also a kind of show-off, and there is no malice, and even very proud.
Of course, this is only the author's personal opinion, but taking this opportunity, the author is very willing to talk about Mr. Lu Xun as a person, and even the "criticism" of other celebrity writers. Because the same praise is not interesting, Mr. Lu Xun's greatness does not need to be repeated too much.
To be more direct, we will no longer repeat Mr. Lu Xun's life experience and contribution achievements, even if everyone has not systematically understood, I believe that as long as it is a person who has studied for several years, they will not be unfamiliar with the name of Mr. Lu Xun, in the words of the writer Yu Hua, that is, in the special era that can only be called "comrade", only two people can be called "Mr.", one is Mr. Lu Xun, the other is Mr. Marx.
Here is a direct chat about the writer Wang Shuo's evaluation of Mr. Lu Xun, which is a very long article, and it also involves some remarks in the interview program, and the author simply sorts it out.
First of all, Wang Shuo did not completely deny Mr. Lu Xun, but only believed that Mr. Lu Xun was over-interpreted and deified.
In fact, Wang Shuo's views are not a minority among the writers of the same period, and many writers have expressed similar views successively, but in comparison, Wang Shuo is more direct and more influential, so that he has become a representative of "de-Lu Xunhua".
Including the above-mentioned article, Yu Hua, who has great respect for Mr. Lu Xun, has also expressed similar views, just as the special treatment of the "two gentlemen" period has made Lu Xun's influence more far-reaching, and the corresponding has also suffered more criticism, which is inevitable.
As the writers of that period said, it was Mr. Lu Xun who was treated specially before many people's cognition was biased, and what needed to be done now was to make the evaluation more fair.
Secondly, what is Wang Shuo's evaluation? Does it really make sense? One of the most controversial ones should be that Wang Shuo believes that Lu Xun is a very qualified, even excellent writer, but not a thinker.
Because throughout all of Mr. Lu Xun's writings, almost all of them are aimed at some worldly events, sober and profound. However, there is no too positive, systematic work on ideological propositions.
For example, in a certain period of time, almost all active Republic of China writers participated in the dispute between "Mr. De" and "Mr. Sai", Lu Xun did not express his own views, at most in some other articles, occasionally mentioned.
As a thinker, if there is no work that can represent his own ideas, it is obviously unqualified, for example, Mr. Marx, who is also "Mr. Lu Xun", has iconic books such as Capital.
It is undeniable that in terms of international influence, Mr. Lu Xun is still inferior to Mr. Marx, which is indisputable. But just because Mr. Lu Xun does not have a book that can represent his own ideas and advocates, can he directly deny it? This evaluation standard, the author thinks that there will be some non-objective.
A similar situation occurred in another evaluation of Wang Shuo, who believed that Mr. Lu Xun did not have a long work, which obviously could not be regarded as a world-class literary hero, because it was impossible to stand on some essays and short stories alone.
Regarding this statement, which is widely circulated in the literary circles, it is also an imported product, which is transmitted from France, and it is also a relatively high degree of recognition in the literary circles of the world today, and everyone should not take any examples of great poets such as Li Bai, Du Fu, and Bai Juyi, because the national conditions are different, this evaluation standard is transmitted from foreigners, and it has been a total of two hundred years since it was proposed.
What do these criticisms say? Most of them are the differences in creative concepts, which are also irreconcilable, and there is no discussion value, just like Wang Shuo is very disapproval of Yu Hua's "take" style, so he can only write about some of the things around him and the things in the compound.
There is no right or wrong, just like the difference between romanticism and realism, in terms of ideas can not be together, how can they recognize each other? Otherwise, the scolding war set off by Mr. Lu Xun in that year could be reduced by more than half except for a few sworn enemies.
In fact, compared with the difference in creative concepts, the author is more willing to talk about the topic of "forgetting Lu Xun"!
Everyone forgot about him "Mr. Lu Xun", and his spirit was free and he progressed!
In fact, Wang Shuo was not the proposer of "de-Lu Xunization", or the above reasons, because of these few words, he was directly judged to be a "vanguard army". To put it bluntly, it is still the above problem, in Wang Shuo's view, Mr. Lu Xun has been treated specially, and even degenerated into a "dogma", controlling many people who are not free.
Since this is the case, we may as well break the dogma and forget Lu Xun, the core meaning is to let everyone correctly recognize Lu Xun,
Note, what is the author emphasizing?
If you are a hardcore fan of Wang Shuo and have really read his books, then it is not difficult to find that Wang Shuo still admires Mr. Lu Xun very much, and he is not the representative of the "de-Lu Xunhua" who is now hyped up!
<h1 class="pgc-h-arrow-right" data-track="39" > author self-nominated</h1>
1) Materials of Wang Shuo and Wang Ziwen: The love affair of the old cannon in the Beijing circle, and the history of the ascension of third-line female artists
2) Wang Shuo commented on Guo Degang: The old and the new said that there is a cross-talk 'thing' in! What does that 'thing' mean
3) Wang Shuo commented on Bai Yansong: The sincerity of self-belief is just a contrivance in the bones, and there is no superior opinion
4) Was Hou Yaowen killed by Wang Shuo? Why did Guo Degang remain silent for 13 years and stick to the "inheritance case"
5) Wang Shuo talked about Jin Yong's plagiarism, took stock of the three deadly sins, and beat Facebook fans tout remarks comparable to "Dream of the Red Chamber"
This article is [Cao Jingming] original, picture source network! #Wang Shuo ##鲁迅 #