Three devil's spokespeople: Obama of the United States, Merkel of Germany, macron of France?

Big people do things, pay attention to the big pattern, this big pattern is mainly composed of two aspects, one is the face, the other is the big pattern, so the big people do things, must talk about the big trend.

Look at the United States, Obama is the big man, his Taoism is the leader of mankind, the absolutely fair world, the heavenly kingdom on earth, everyone is the embodiment of justice, in order to achieve this great just order, Obama first of all to save the rights of black people, raise the sense of justice of black people. The truth is simple, because he himself is black. When Obama pushes the black movement to its climax, he will follow the same line of thinking and the same pattern to save the gay crowd, the people who are clearly men but insist that they are women.

Obama's line of thinking is clear, he first assumes a dominant and influential value spectrum, then in the name of caring for the vulnerable, locks this mainstream value as the source of all evil, and then assumes that all the vulnerable are defenders of justice. This set of plays is very easy to catch on, because everyone is a potential rebel, and when a rebellious person finds a clear object of resistance, they find the meaning of life.

So in life, it's easy to find that people who have always liked to be different, such as artists, such as media people, such as intellectuals, are most enthusiastic about this rebellious game, which has almost become a physiological instinct of these people, so that they do not need to think about what human nature is, and they can naturally join Obama's camp.

Look at the words of the literary scholar Haruki Murakami, "On the proposition of choosing eggs and stones, I will always be on the side of the egg." "On the surface, it's a rather encouraging, boiling word, yes, there are so many poor, miserable, obscure, untethered people in this world that we should speak up for them, and when the rights and freedoms of the vulnerable are guaranteed, our own rights and freedoms are guaranteed with them." In the face of such words, how many people have raised the necessary doubts and questions?

A simple common sense is placed here, the vulnerable groups are also people, and people have human defects. When we place a bunch of absolute rights to absolute fairness and absolute liberty on any one of the finitely sinful, what reason do we have to ensure that these vulnerable people do not abuse their right to liberty, and what reason do we have to ensure that they do not move from a weak position to a state of doing whatever they want?

Interestingly, when we have been clamoring for years to limit the rights of the elite, to limit the power of government, why have we forgotten to restrict the rights of the vulnerable as well. Historically, are there still fewer people who arose in the grass and later came to the realm of murderous people?

However, this simple thinking, Obama could not listen. Because he's going to do big things. He imagined himself to be the leader of humanity, the savior of the world. What he wants to pursue is the unity of mankind, the equality of all people, and the unity of the world. In fact, a woman like Merkel in Germany, who grew up in an authoritarian environment, is also subject to her own vulnerable identity imagination like Obama, so she always has an angelic imagination of all vulnerable groups. So, at Merkel's waving hand, millions of refugees poured into Germany, and Germany, which was built from the rubble after World War II, was finally taken to a world of half angels and half devils by a vulnerable woman named Merkel.

I'm trying to say that if you read Obama and Merkel, you can read Trump. This person who was born to be an elite, this entrepreneur who was covered in copper smell, came up to do something American first, thought about American jobs all day, and was complacent about a little economic growth.

In the eyes of Obama and Merkel, it is obvious that the pattern is too small, short-sighted, and a kind of rich and unkind style. So Obama said at McCain's funeral that at all times he puts equality for all at the top of his values. But at the same time he had long forgotten that the premise of equality for all was the existence of God, and that under God everyone was equal.

In this sense, we can say that people who really have a sense of human grand justice do not like Trump. Those whose mission is to care for the vulnerable do not like Trump very much. Or to put it this way, Obama seems to be the big picture of human justice, and Trump is the small picture of America first. It is based on this that how many people love Obama, how many people hate old Trump.

As for who is really concerned about the disadvantaged in the end, who can lead people to a happy life of living and working in peace and contentment, the grassroots in the United States, that is, the red-necked people who are despised by the reading and literary youth, that is, those who take the Christian faith as the spirit of the township, but have a seemingly innate comprehensive judgment, they do not believe in Obama's series of politically correct utopian lies, they can easily identify the traps, and thus do not hesitate to vote for Trump. It is this kind of comprehensive judgment from the traditional American people that becomes the american order of people's feelings, thus constituting the greatness of the United States, and this great power cannot be copied, and it leaves other countries such as Germany and France far behind.

As for the young Man macron in France, at this moment he is in the midst of a utopia of his own making. I was worried about whether this young man, who had never experienced the hardships and sorrows of life, would be guillotineed by the grumpy French in the next period of time.