Former German Chancellor Angela Merkel has been in charge of Germany for 16 years, and is one of the few pragmatic and outstanding politicians in the world political arena, and merkel's departure from office last year is indeed a regrettable thing. With Merkel's ability to govern and a rational and pragmatic attitude, Merkel really should continue to exert her residual heat.
First thing: the olive branch of the United Nations, Merkel's next journey in the work will be the United Nations!
On January 19, according to The Agence France-Presse, UN sources said that UN Secretary-General António Guterres had proposed former German Chancellor Angela Merkel to serve as a UN adviser to lead the global high-level advisory body on public goods.
It is reported that Guterres wrote to Merkel to give this proposal, and the United Nations has not yet received a reply from Merkel. According to the report, the United Nations side believes that Merkel's chances of accepting the job offer are not high.
Although the United Nations claims that Merkel is not very likely to accept the invitation, the call for Merkel to come out of the mountains again is still very high. Merkel has been Chancellor of Germany for 16 years, and with Merkel's credentials, it is honest that she will be the Secretary-General of the United Nations, or the President of the European Commission, without any problems.
The current UN Secretary-General Guterres is five years older than Merkel, and European Commission President von Braun is only four years younger than Merkel, and in terms of age, Merkel is completely fine.
Of course, from Merkel's point of view, Merkel really has no need to go out of the mountain. If Merkel is willing to continue to work and enter politics, Merkel will not give up running for German chancellor. Not competing for german chancellor actually means that Merkel has decided to do so.
In a word, Merkel has contributed everything to Germany, and during her tenure, Sino-German relations, Russian-German relations, as well as Central and European relations, have remained stable.
Merkel is a rare rational and pragmatic politician in Europe, for Merkel, she can leave, but more importantly, there should be someone in German politics, which is probably Merkel's biggest wish after leaving office.
As a result, the chances of Merkel actually coming out of the mountains again are slim. It's time for Merkel to enjoy her old age.
The second thing: THE US congressman proposed to sanction Bach, and the hegemonic nature of the United States was fully revealed!
On January 19, as the Beijing Winter Olympics were about to open, a U.S. congressman introduced a new bill calling for sanctions against IOC President Bach and other senior IOC personnel, according to VOA.
The reason why U.S. lawmakers proposed sanctions against the president of the International Olympic Committee is mainly because Mr. Bach has said a few fair words for China, and has made a clear statement that he refuses to politicize sports, does not attach to the "human rights" issues against China provoked by the United States, and does not act in accordance with the intentions of the United States.
To tell the truth, if the United States really wants to sanction Mr. Bach, this is another example of the naked international bullying of the United States. Previously, the United States launched sanctions against other countries at every turn, but it did not expect that the quality of domestic parliamentarians in the United States was inferior enough to sanction international organizations such as the International Olympic Committee.
The move of the US congressman fully shows that the bullying of the United States is omnipresent. Any country and organization, as long as it does not follow the requirements of the United States, as long as it disobeys the intentions of the United States, the United States may exert bullying. The United States has even blatantly disapproved of the IOC's attention.
And this matter also reflects from the side that the United States has suppressed and contained China has been pervasive. The Winter Olympics are not an area of major interest and concern with the United States, which is still deliberately trying to make a stumbling block for China.
If it were other areas of major concern, I am afraid that the means used by the United States would be even more despicable and hostile.
Facts have shown that the United States is the world's largest bullying country. The United States is accustomed to proceeding from the position of strength and maintaining its hegemonic position with hegemonic behavior, engaging in the same set of the party fighting against the same and respecting only the other.
Not only can the United States treat other countries as equals, even if it is an international organization, the United States does not have the slightest respect, and the image of such an United States has been completely bankrupt.
The third thing: the United States maliciously speculates about China, and the United States only has the interests of the United States in its eyes!
On Jan. 18, the New York Times reported that if widespread lockdowns become more common in China, the impact on supply chains could ripple throughout the United States. China's new round of epidemic lockdown may further disrupt the global supply chain!
The New York Times said the new major disruption to supply chains could lead to a loss of consumer confidence, worsening inflation, already at a 40-year high, and challenging the Biden administration and the Federal Reserve.
The New York Times's remarks are actually only one, that is, China's epidemic prevention measures are causing trouble for Americans. The implication now is that China's epidemic prevention cannot be premised on sacrificing the interests of the United States.
I have to say that this statement by the New York Times is the truest portrayal of the US position. The United States does not care at all about the life and death of Chinese, the United States only cares about whether the supply chain of the United States will be affected. If other countries influence the United States, the United States will be a big hat buckled.
Despite such malicious speculation in the American media about China. But is it what the United States says? To say that China affects the global supply chain, we are very strange, what happened to the congestion in the West Coast ports in the United States last year?
The epidemic in the United States is out of control, resulting in a large-scale infection of port workers, a serious shortage of workers, and empty domestic shelves in the United States. Why hasn't the US media reflected on the impact of not controlling the epidemic on supply chains? This is something that happens in the United States.
And, no matter what the US media thinks, we should do it. Facts have proved that under the epidemic, China's epidemic prevention policy is highly effective, and China is still the largest and most reliable guarantee of global material supply.
The US media is full of prejudice and malice toward China, but this cannot shake China's determination to prevent the epidemic. We have confidence in our epidemic prevention policy and the stability of our economic situation.
(End of this article)
Statement: The picture comes from the network, if it is infringing, please contact to delete!