Xinhui Liang Qichao, Yu Hangzhang Binglin. The influence of mr. two men on modern intellectual circles is quite profound. They were all written and other bodies, born at the end of the Qing Dynasty and the Republic of China, and suffered from chaos. At first, they were both scholars and politicians.
When I was young, I wanted to do something in politics. Helplessly, after some experience, I knew myself, one is not Zeng Wenzheng, the other is not Li Wenzhong. Not all bookish businesses can clean up the mess and put it right. In terms of political ambitions, he was not satisfied, so he could only retreat to writing and teaching and educating people. This can also be regarded as a common choice for scholars who have not aspired since ancient times, and they have followed the back road of their masters.
Cover "things can not be two big", politics is not ambitious, there is only one heart to learn this road. It is precisely because of this that the two gentlemen can have such achievements in "sorting out the history of the country".
With the history of rule and academic thought in the three hundred years of the Qing Dynasty, its achievements in the long river of history are also very great, and the summary work in this regard has not yet produced a good result.
Huang Zongxi established his status as a generation of masters in the ideological circles because of the "Song Yuanxue Case" and the "Ming Confucianism Case"; and Xu Shichang, a great president from Hanlin, also wrote "The Case of Qing Confucianism". Bad reviews, but always much better than nothing.
To this day, many people mention the era of the Republic of China, and they still say how many masters there have been in the Republic of China. However, I have not heard of any gentleman who has made a great effort to make a "Study Case for Scholars of the Republic of China".
Li Hongzhang's proposition: "The situation that has not changed in three thousand years, and the strong enemy that has not been encountered in three thousand years." ”
Perhaps the background of modern history is relatively grand and complex, different from the Ding Revolution of any dynasty in history. Therefore, whether it is the history of the country or the study case of Mr. A certain, it is not easy to write.
It is no wonder that the "Draft History of the Qing Dynasty" was compiled by governor Zhao Erxun, through Yuan Shikai's Beiyang, Chiang Kai-shek's Republic of China, and now the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. It has been more than a hundred years since the fall of the Qing dynasty, and the "History of the Qing" of the three hundred years of the former Qing Dynasty has not yet been finalized. Sigh, there is no Sima in the world, two classes, "History", "Book of Han" or not out of the world?
Liang Qichao's "Introduction to Three Hundred Years of Scholarship in the Qing Dynasty", Zhang Taiyan's "Tongzong of Guoxue" and "The Flow of the Sons". One introduces several great Confucian schools of thought in the Qing Dynasty, and the other discusses the origin of the Spring and Autumn Warring States. The writing is still good, these two pamphlets are just a general introduction of the three schools of Confucianism, Interpretation, and Taoism by the two gentlemen. To know the scale of the two gentlemen's studies, you can read Liang Qichao's "Drinking Ice Room Collection" and Zhang Binglin's "Zhang's Series".
I think: No matter what era people are in? What is your identity? What industry are you in? The most basic study of our country's inherent, the hundred sons and twenty-four histories, must be known. The old man said, "There is profit for profit, but there is no use for it." "Well.