<h1 class="pgc-h-arrow-right" data-track="93" > a four-hour "revised version" of "Zach Schneider's version of Justice League." </h1>
There are re-shots, re-editing, changing the soundtrack, adding new characters, everything that looks familiar but is injected with vitality, making people feel refreshed.
However, I prefer this version, more than the two-hour theatrical version in 2017.
"Warner" and "Zach Schneider" are no less than any feature film, the director himself has not had a film with more than $1 billion as the bottom card, and Warner's small goal of $1 billion set every time he spends a lot of money to let him control the DCEU film can not be achieved.
Among them, "Justice League" is the most dramatic, not only did the director's adopted daughter commit suicide in the middle of the way, which led to the final full withdrawal of the remaining filming work, Warner also poached "Joss Whedon" to complete the remaining work.
At first, "Joss Whedon" belonged only to the screenwriting work, and later involved the scope of the director's work, simply changing the original script of "Zach Schneider" and reshooting.
Warner, who thought that the movie version would be a sure success, had a plot that could not be forced to be epic, insisting on releasing it in a two-hour version instead of the five hours that Zach Schneider had originally intended.
In the end, it became warner's face-slapping, the biggest loss of the scale of investment.
In addition to Warner's green card, the director's cut version of Zach Schneider has been promised that many fans have always believed that the director's cut version of Justice League can also be rushed for the new streaming media.
The pressure on both sides has been solved, and Warner still does not spend seventy million dollars to let the director make up and edit, etc., which can make a new superhero movie.
It has been said that there will be no follow-up story of the Justice League, but three Easter eggs in a row, as well as the Martian Manhunter and the Joker who did not appear in the first place, are showing the green light for the sequel!
Director's cut version, is it really necessary?
Yes, this four-hour guide cut not only completes the original appearance of the story that the director himself wants to present, but also greatly modifies the special effects and tones to better meet the needs of the plot, and most importantly, there is more time to introduce the background of each superhero, and there is no longer a sudden situation with unclear motives, which is very satisfactory.
The steel bone of the cinema version reduced to a tool man has a real dominant position under the director's "skillful hand", in addition to enriching the father-son line, but also allowing him to almost summarize the main plot related to the mother box.
The scene where The Flash rescues his girlfriend when he appears is very loving and romantic.
Superman still appears three-quarters of the way through the film, with fewer scenes but his black super suit finally appears.
The bulky Batman charged in the tail battle, full of energy.
Diana was noticeably handsome at the moment of her debut, and the hostage rescue scene lasted up to eight minutes, and the bullet blocking and divine speed seemed to adjust the quick button.
But the director's favorite slow motion is frequent, a bit of aesthetic fatigue.
Aquaman Arthur's line remains the same, and even Steppenwolf has been cast as a villain with a story and a history, just like Marvel's Thanos next door.
The action scenes are more exciting than the theatrical version, although the scenes have been seen, but after the rearrangement of colors, it not only makes the picture more epic, but also richer.
Invaded by the enemy Steppenwolf from Amazon Paradise Island, the entire process of the Amazon warriors protecting the mother box and the Steppenwolf shows significant lengthening and tension.
When Diana tells about the ancient war, the green lantern man that appears on the screen is also invisible to the theater version, and the picture of the three tribes uniting and the war is more enjoyable than the hasty belt in the theater version, and even the plot and lines are completely different.
The big fight at the end seems to be changed into a new outfit, deleting the bizarre "speed contrast" between The Flash and Superman in the Easter egg, making the six-person combination look cleaner and seeing the long-lost blood.
The soundtrack has changed, and there are not many memory points, but Diana's exclusive BGM still exists.
The plot is full, the narrative is smoother, the atmosphere is more depressing, the laying and extension are better, and the injustice alliance in the parallel world in the Easter egg also makes people look forward to the follow-up development.
Instead of using the "Joss Whedon" shooting scene, only the old material is re-edited and reshot, maintaining the same dark wind, buying the bill, the color is dark but more in line with the epic plot.
I've always believed that since Marvel next door is taking a light and humorous movie route, why not insist on a rigorous and bitter style, even if the audience does not buy it today, he will still be mindful and become a classic.
But Warner, which stands at the moment of interests, ignores the creator's purpose, blindly emulates competitors and eventually becomes the result of itching in the air, and it is not easy to turn around and talk about the ark that is sailing in the wrong direction.