Quality education is the loudest word at the moment, and for indoctrination is completely marginalized, whether it is the evaluation of high-quality lessons or the publication of papers, it can be said that no teacher can put indoctrination as an independent concept and publish it.
Because in the eyes of the promoters of quality education, indoctrination is synonymous with cramming, passive learning, lack of personality, and loss of creativity. It is precisely for this reason that even if we use the indoctrination education method, no one is willing to mention it, but try to avoid it, as if the indoctrination education method is a taboo in education.
However, is the indoctrination method of education really so unbearable? In fact, this is a direct manifestation of the extreme nature of the current educational reform.
Active learning, inquiry, discussion, and experimentation are indeed much more lively and flexible than indoctrination, and students are more engaged. But don't they have limitations? They also need to be fully demonstrated in the right type of course, and not all types of courses have their place.
The concept of quality education has been put forward for 30 years, but up to now, the definition of the concept in the education industry is still relatively vague, some directly refer to art and physical education as quality education, and some think that it is moral literacy and the ability to master knowledge, as well as various other qualities, such as communication, hands-on practice, self-discipline, etc.
In fact, quality education is a broad concept that cannot be simply defined, and it is precisely for this reason that in the actual education and teaching, quality education has become a universal sticker, which is indiscriminately pasted on various occasions. And when it comes to the specific situation, what quality is has become an ambiguous existence.
It is precisely because of the existence of such problems that some teachers and even experts have a view that quality education has been proposed for so many years and has not seen much change in education.
This is actually because the learning and improvement of knowledge and ability cannot be covered by one sentence of quality. Ability is based on knowledge and is consolidated, perfected and improved through continuous learning of knowledge. Regardless of memory ability, observation ability, thinking ability, comprehension ability, comprehensive application ability, etc., it is necessary to constantly repeat and accumulate in order to form their own knowledge structure and ability range.
Ancient Confucianism believed that "the mandate of heaven is sexuality, the spontaneity is the Tao, and the cultivation of the Tao is teaching". To put it simply, people should conform to their own nature, pursue moral perfection, and influence and educate others through their own cultivation and behavior. So, what is education? It is the educator who guides, inspires, and influences the educated.
When teachers organize teaching, they should be led by teachers, and they are the organizers and decision-makers of education, rather than the so-called quality education at the moment to determine a certain model first--that is just waiting for the rabbits, if the rabbits do not come, the students may only starve to death, is there a second possibility? Is this similar to Wang Yangmingge's bamboo?
Indoctrination should be the most basic way of teaching and teaching. The fastest way to obtain martial arts in martial arts novels is for the old man to instill his skills into future generations, and the inheritance of knowledge and experience is also the easiest and fastest. If a student wants to master ability, doesn't he need to first learn knowledge and then develop his ability on the basis of knowledge? Without the inculcation of knowledge, where will the quality come from? That is, the experience of life and production, isn't it the same?
Let's take a few simple examples. If you want your children to be moral, you must instill in them what morality is, how to do moral behavior, and what immoral behavior is; if you want children to be patriotic, you must instill in them what a country is, what is patriotism, why you should be patriotic, and what are the contents of patriotism.
The cultivation of such moral character needs to be instilled, and it is not an exaggeration to say that it is brainwashing. If students want to know right and wrong, we must continue to indoctrinate them so that they can form clear ideas and consciousness in their minds. In this way, they can show their literacy in words, deeds and behaviors, which is the quality of a person. Studying knowledge is the first step, and practice is the last step -- without knowledge, how can there be morality? Without indoctrination, can children's abilities and qualities be formed? That is simply a fool's dream.
In fact, not only moral cultivation, but also natural sciences such as mathematics, physics and chemistry are also inseparable from indoctrination. Unless you implant a chip directly into the child's brain, but that's also indoctrination – pouring knowledge directly into the brain.
There is no fixed way to teach. There are many ways and means of teaching, and we need to use them flexibly, rather than pressing one by one as we do now. Education and teaching should be adapted to local and people's conditions, instilled when it should be instilled, inspired when it should be inspired, we must learn to adapt to the situation, the best choice.
At present, experts and scholars have spared no effort to promote this educational model and that educational method, which is actually a typical formalism and has little practical significance.
Dear readers, what do you have to say about the fact that quality education is in the limelight at present, but indoctrination is completely marginalized?
[I am Butterfly Flower Rain Education, focusing on current affairs and the latest education trends, and I like to express my thoughts and thoughts in words. Friends who like me, please follow me: Butterfly Flower Rain Talk Education]