laitimes

Whether diligence can make up for clumsiness or diligence to hide clumsiness, whether diligent in thinking

author:Flying Xiaoyu

Xueba and Jiwa work in different ways, drive differently, and achieve different results. Xuebai also works hard, but they are more efficient in learning, and the lack of effort they show is the embodiment of their ability to learn, rather than simply playing and not interested in learning, they don't need to work hard, but they are more willing to have systematic and complete time to achieve the effect of in-depth learning.

The efforts of the chicken baby, with instinctive resistance, are in the absence of the establishment of independent thinking ability, through repeated indoctrination to form proficiency, rather than active learning from learning interest, especially in primary school, most of Peiyou is not thinking ability beyond peers, but just use the time advantage of the lower grades, in advance to memorize the skills of the upper grades.

Whether diligence can make up for clumsiness or diligence to hide clumsiness, whether diligent in thinking

Students with strong independent thinking ability can touch on the same in learning, and learn more difficult knowledge points from their own ability, rather than pulling out seedlings to help them. A strong desire to learn makes them enjoy the process of thinking, and the more challenging it is, the stronger the curiosity, and learning itself is a pleasure.

These particularly smart children may not be interested in the teacher's homework, because they feel that it is too simple, just a simple time consumption, not not no effort, their efforts are focused on independent learning that they feel is meaningful, this kind of children learn Olympiad, which can meet the needs of their thinking ability expansion.

Whether diligence can make up for clumsiness or diligence to hide clumsiness, whether diligent in thinking

There is an innate foundation for the thinking ability gap, and there is also the bonus of acquired efforts, some children do not have a strong talent, but they have the habit of independent thinking, and they also show a hard-working side, some children are really diligent to expand their thinking, and some are low-intensity and inefficient efforts.

This gap becomes more and more obvious as the difficulty of learning increases. Some children only review one geometric proof problem in half an hour, but it is a deep thinking summary, while some children take longer and do more questions to form proficiency, especially some children who rely on training, and the phenomenon of model solidification is particularly obvious.

Whether diligence can make up for clumsiness or diligence to hide clumsiness, whether diligent in thinking

Read on