#时事热点头条说#
To defend the perpetrators is a great step backwards for civilization.
Is it a question that is problematic in itself, because it stands in the position of the cat abuser, acknowledging the rights and interests he can enjoy, while ignoring the fact that he abuses animals.
If you use the same logic to think about this question, you may have a clearer idea, and you will feel how ridiculous and unreasonable!
Does a prisoner have to lose his freedom? In the same logic, why is there still many people discussing the above question, while some people are able to ask a rhetorical question about the following question?
(The pictures in this article are all from the Internet)
In essence, it is because it is not civilized and civilized enough, so it feels that the rights and interests of a small animal are not as good as that of people. It is true that when animals are harming people, human rights should be recognized as greater than animal rights, but when animals are innocently harmed, human rights are higher than animal rights, which is incomprehensible!
Criminals are just making mistakes, so why should they lose their freedom? If they don't lose their freedom, they won't change? But if they lose their freedom and they can change, why should they take the risk of letting them go? If they do the same mistakes again, wouldn't it hurt more people?
In their concept, a cat is just an animal, and people have dominance over animals, but they hurt a cat, and the price to pay for it is actually a person's future, how a pity?
Such a concept, if it is placed on such people themselves or their families, they will definitely not be so generous, because some goodness is hypocrisy, but civilization is not a hypocrisy, civilization is able to be equal, objectively look at the fact that every life should be respected.
These people are so generous, but if you want them to accept living with such a person, or put this classmate next to their own family, you will see if they will agree, and you will not worry!
A person who abuses animals and uploads videos must feel happy in the process of abuse and take pride in it, which is completely different from hurting animals when children are ignorant, the latter is just naïve and ignorant, and the former is really terrible. Because you can't predict when the person will not be able to experience satisfaction in the process of abusing animals, and will instead choose the subject of abuse.
Animals can't speak, but the blood and tears of animals are the existence that civilized people should hate, why are there small animal protection laws in some places, why are there small animal protection organizations in this world?
Those who have been wronged by cat abuse students may never understand why some jobs have to be reviewed for three generations. In their view, this kind of scrutiny is disrespectful to people, in their view, the father is the father, the mother is the mother, and the person who has made a mistake should draw a line with the person, even if it is a relative.
Such people can never understand why a person's work can be dragged down by relatives. But they never question, or dare not question, because they can't reach the main body of the three generations, but for a cat, they ridicule, trample, and humiliate are not punished by law, so morality has become the last fig leaf.
It's just a pity that some people even abandon morality, in their eyes, the cat's life is cheap, and the future is precious, so they feel sorry for a cat abuse student, but I don't know if this student will go to the temple in the future and sit in a high position, will they also regard their lives as grass?