Former Meizu executive Li Nan posted a long article bombarding Xiaomi.
Li Nan said that Xiaomi is looking for Up to attack consumerism and capitalism, and it is on the hot search!
Qualcomm platform prices are rising, and Xiaomi is taking advantage of China's cheap infrastructure and supply chain dividends to sell the largest Qualcomm chips.
He thinks that Xiaomi is an anti-consumerist act, Xiaomi is cost-effective, where did the flagship of 1999 go?
……
In words, millet is belittled as useless.
Netizens replied to Li Nan, the plastic keyboard can be sold for 5000, why is Xiaomi so cheap.
Li Nan said that he and Xiaomi's flagships are expensive, but Xiaomi's profits are transferred to Qualcomm, and his profits are paid to designers!
Netizen: In addition to chips, the domestic production rate of other Xiaomi parts is also very high, and Xiaomi has also been helpful to the domestic industrial chain for so many years
Li Nan: Minimum added value.
Netizen: In summary, it sells too cheaply.
Li Nan: The American part is very expensive, and the Chinese part is very cheap.
Netizen: If you kid uses American Apple, we are not allowed to use Chinese millet.
Li Nan: Apple contributed more profits to China, or Xiaomi contributed more to the United States, it is really uncertain.
What do you think about this? There are also many netizens who "Xiaomi brand safety" and hope that Xiaomi will severely punish Li Nan.
What do you think about this?