Fehel's unique interpretation of the French Revolution occupies a special place in the Marxist theoretical system. He made a profound reinterpretation of Marx's concept of the French Revolution, pointing out its theoretical contributions and shortcomings. Fehel emphasized that Marx's reading of the French Revolution was a model of a Marxist view of politics, but it also revealed its inherent theoretical conflict. Marx's affirmation of the Paris Commune as a great proletarian revolution and the abolition of false democracy at the same time showed an inherent theoretical contradiction in Fecher's view. In addition, he pointed out that Marx's lack of consideration for the feasibility of radical change in other cities made the Paris Commune a universal theoretical model. According to Fecher, Marx's conception of the French Revolution was German-centric and France-centric, and this view was reflected in the writings of Marx and Engels in the early 40s of the 19th century.
Fehel's reinterpretation of the French Revolution lies in the discovery of flaws in Marx's theory in his critique. He argues that Marx's ignorance of the possibility of radical change in other cities led to an unwidespread theoretical model of the Paris Commune. In addition, Marx's analysis of democracy in the French Revolution is inherently theoretically conflicting, both positively affirming the historical achievements of the Paris Commune and advocating the active abolition of false democracy. Fehel sees this as a theoretical contradiction in Marx's conception of the French Revolution.
In Marx's view, the French Revolution was a model for the proletariat to achieve social emancipation and labor emancipation. Fehel emphasized Marx's high opinion of the Paris Commune, arguing that this movement proved that the working class was the protagonist of the socialist revolution. However, Fehr reflected on Marx's conception of the French Revolution on a deeper level. He pointed out that Marx's views were German-centric, France-centric, and lacked consideration for radical changes elsewhere. Fehel argues that the success of the Paris Commune was a combination of fortuitous events and was not universal, so Marx's theoretical model was missing.
Marx's social theory revolves around the analysis of German reality and economy, but his political theory is centered on France. According to Fehel, Marx's conception of the French Revolution opened up a mode of political science research. He believed that the success of the Paris Commune proved the essence of Marx's proletarian theory, that the working class was the protagonist of the socialist revolution. Fehel pointed out that Marx's conception of the French Revolution served as an exemplary explanation for political events elsewhere and became the basis of his political science research.
Fehel gave a comprehensive interpretation of Marx's view of the French Revolution, and pointed out the theoretical conflict and the question of practical feasibility. He believed that Marx had an inherent contradiction in his theory about democracy, and advocated the active abolition of false democracy. However, Marx's lack of consideration of the possibilities of radical change in other cities prevented the Paris Commune from becoming a universal theoretical model. Fecher argues that Marx's conception of the French Revolution served as an exemplary role in explaining political events elsewhere, opening up a model for his political studies.
In Marx's conception of the French Revolution, the contradiction of democracy became the focus of Fehel's attention. Marx's emphasis on the abolition of false democracies is considered by Fehel to be Marx's reflection on the inherent contradictions of democracy. At the same time, however, he points out that Marx's lack of consideration for radical changes in other cities prevented the Paris Commune from becoming a universal theoretical model. Fecher believed that the success of the Paris Commune was a combination of fortuitous events, not an inevitable consequence of Marx's theory.
In general, Fehel's reinterpretation of the French Revolution reveals the theoretical contradictions and practical feasibility of Marx's conception of the French Revolution. He pointed out that Marx's neglect of radical changes in other cities prevented the Paris Commune from becoming a universal theoretical model. However, he also affirmed that Marx's conception of the French Revolution played an exemplary role in explaining political events in other places, and opened up a model for his political science research.