The prince of the Ming Dynasty was not allowed to return to Beijing without a will, and the prince of the Qing Dynasty was not allowed to leave Beijing without a will.
The Ming and Qing dynasties were very cautious about the division of the prince, and the ultimate purpose was to prevent the prince from "rebelling".
At the same time, on the question of whether the prince is a vassal domain, the practices of the Ming and Qing dynasties are also completely different.
The Ming Dynasty adopted a sub-feudal system, and the princes had to go to their fiefdoms to garrison after receiving the title, and the first task was to help the Ming Dynasty garrison the border and quell local rebellions.
Because of this, the princes everywhere have real power, have military power, and can even directly lead the army.
The prince of the Ming Dynasty was forbidden to return to Beijing without the emperor's will, otherwise it would be regarded as rebellion.
Diametrically opposed to the practice of the Ming Dynasty, the Qing Dynasty adopted the system of dividing and consolidating Beijing.
Although the prince can get the title of prince, his place of residence must be in the capital, and without the emperor's will, he is not allowed to leave the capital for half a step.
And most of the princes of the Qing Dynasty, except for the iron hat king, did not have a hereditary replacement.
These princes, who were pampered in the capital, gradually lost the basic combat power of the Manchus, let alone lead the troops to fight, and could only mix in the power struggle in the capital.
The Ming and Qing dynasties suffered losses in the setting and role of the prince.
Zhu Yuanzhang's idea is very simple, thinking that everyone with the surname Zhu will jointly defend the world of their own family, but in fact, there are countless princes with ill intentions.
The Qing Dynasty learned the lessons of the Ming Dynasty and thought that if the princes were closed in the capital, they would avoid trouble, but they didn't know that the interest of the princes in participating in the political struggle was also very high, and the nine sons seized the heir is a clear example.
So, who is more clever and reasonable between the two?
