Before reading this article, please click "Follow", your attention is the source of motivation for the author's continuous creation, committed to high-quality original content, and unremittingly present good content to everyone, bringing you a good reading experience.
New U.S. Military Operations in the Middle East: Self-Defense or Provoking a New Conflict? As the war continues to spread in the Middle East, US President Joe Biden's latest decision has exacerbated the situation in the region. In response to a recent series of attacks on U.S. military personnel, Biden ordered strikes on Iranian facilities in Syria. This decision has not only become the focus of the international community, but has further exacerbated tensions in the Middle East.
U.S. Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin quickly confirmed the airstrike and stressed that it was a precision military operation. According to reports, 14 recent attacks have targeted U.S. forces, three in Syria and 11 in Iraq, resulting in the wounding of 24 U.S. soldiers. But is this military strike an act of self-defense or retaliation? Although the United States insists on the former, many international observers have questioned it.
At the same time, the United States is trying to clearly distinguish this military operation from the Palestinian-Israeli conflict in the Middle East. The U.S. government claims that the military strike is aimed at protecting its military personnel in Syria and Iraq and does not mean a change in its position in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
However, the political map of the Middle East is complex. Iran has always been a staunch supporter of Palestine, while the United States has been a staunch supporter of Israel. The rivalry between the two powers in the Middle East is often not just about military frictions, but also involves deep-seated political and geopolitical disputes. Notably, certain U.S. military presence in the Middle East – such as alleged theft of Syrian oil and wheat – has become another point of contention.
Under the military pressure of the United States, Iran has chosen to seek external support, especially from China. It is reported that Iran's high-level talks with China have been held, from which they have received firm pledges of support. China made it clear that it will continue to support Iran in safeguarding its national sovereignty and oppose any external interference.
The friendly relations between China and Iran have lasted for many years, especially during major events in the Middle East, and the relations between the two countries have been strengthened day by day. With China's unwavering support, Iran's position in the international arena is even more solid.
Today's turbulent situation in the Middle East should be resolved by the countries on the ground and not by external influences. But the U.S. military involvement has undoubtedly upset this balance. However, the future of the Middle East should be determined by itself. China's support provides a solid foundation for regional peace, while U.S. intervention will only lead to further tensions.
Nevertheless, hopes for peace in the Middle East have not been completely dashed. The Saudi-Iranian rapprochement, for example, is a clear proof of this. If external interference can be truly ruled out, there is still hope for the dawn of peace in the Middle East.
For the sake of lasting peace in the Middle East, all parties concerned should move away from military confrontation and toward dialogue and negotiation. Only when the countries of the Middle East are truly able to determine their own future can the region usher in true peace and prosperity.
The above content materials come from the Internet, do not represent the author's personal views, do not guarantee the accuracy of the content, please look at it rationally, if you have any questions, please contact the author to delete, if you like my article, you can click a free "follow", welcome to express your valuable comments and suggestions on this article.