Before reading this article, please click "Follow", which is convenient for you to discuss and share, and can bring you a different sense of participation, thank you for your support!
It is difficult to define whether it is art or a crime to expose the crime of fornication by Huasha
Title: Wartha performs the crime of fornication difficult to define: the blurred boundary between art and crime
Subtitle: Commentary and discussion on the charges of fornication in Huasha's performance
Introduction:
Recently, Warsha has caused widespread controversy over the alleged involvement of fornication in the content of her performance.
There are different views in society on whether Huasha's performance is illegal and whether it crosses the boundary. This article will provide a detailed analysis of the establishment of the crime of fornication in the performance of Wartha and explore the blurred boundary between art and crime involved.
1. Legal definition of the crime of sexual immorality
The crime of sexual immorality is an act that violates public morality and social order and good customs.
According to the relevant provisions of mainland law, the law has clear provisions on obscene performances and other acts in the entertainment industry. However, we need to interpret the law exactly as to whether the Wartha performance involves the charge of fornication.
Second, the performance content of Huasha performance
The content of Huasha's performance has caused great controversy in the entertainment industry.
Her stage presence, costume matching, and even dance moves have sparked some controversy. However, from an artistic point of view, Huasha's performance style does not cross the bottom line of social order and good customs.
Third, the definition of art and crime is vague
The definition of art and crime has always been a problem that troubles people.
When judging whether a Wartha performance involves a crime of sexual immorality, we need to consider whether the artwork has clear essential characteristics as a crime of sexual immorality, and whether there is a bad influence in social ethics and values.
Fourth, the difference between social ethics and aesthetics
The controversy over Warsaw's performance also reflects the difference between social ethics and aesthetics.
Different groups of people have different levels of understanding and acceptance of works of art, so the judgment of whether a work of art is illegal will also be different.
5. How to deal with the conflict between art and law
How should we deal with the conflict between art and law in response to the accusation of fornication in the performance of Warsha?
To solve this problem, we need to judge according to the law, and at the same time, we should respect the freedom of artistic creation and find a reasonable balance.
Epilogue:
The charge of fornication in Varsa involves the boundary between art and crime, and we need to look at this controversy in a fair and just manner. When judging whether a work of art is illegal, we need to take into account the differences in social ethics and aesthetics, and at the same time respect the freedom of artistic creation.
Only by making accurate judgments in accordance with the provisions of the law can a reasonable and just solution be found.
(The above is only a simulation article, has nothing to do with the actual situation, and if there are similarities, it is purely coincidental.) ）
Disclaimer: If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright pictures or other issues, please contact the author within 30 days, if the reflection is true, we will delete the responsible article as soon as possible. The article is for reference only and does not constitute any investment or application advice.