If there is, DJI must be counted as one, and the tight control of its technology has even reached the point of no leakage.
How exactly did DJI do it?
The name of DJI drones has become famous in China, and many people are curious that DJI's achievements are so prominent, why not other companies being sanctioned by the United States?
It should be known that on the patented technology, Huawei's strength is beyond doubt, but even so, Huawei still suffered a lot of losses in the face of US sanctions.
How can DJI Hede achieve exclusive possession of technology patents?
Since 2008, DJI has attached special importance to patented technology, and up to now, DJI has mastered 5,000 unique patents.
There are also 3,000 nationally certified patents, which can be said to have obtained the country's golden signboard.
Not only that, in order to protect these patented technologies from leakage, DJI has used almost all the resources that can be used to create a unique technical prevention and control system.
To work at DJI, you must accept DJI's own employee management system, which ensures that employees do not copy any data from the database.
Relying on this kind of technical management system, DJI's technology has simply become a pearl in the sea, brilliant but no one can obtain it.
Not only that, DJI's technical defense psychology is also reflected in the recruitment of employees, and it turns out that not any talented employee can enter DJI.
DJI's hiring rules are that no foreigner is recruited, even if he is the top talent in the field.
In DJI's philosophy, if a company recruits foreign technical talents, it will lay hidden dangers at the technical level for the enterprise.
Although many people criticize DJI's unfairness, DJI, a technology giant who has achieved fame, obviously does not care about the false name of the company.
It is understood that as of now, in the global civilian drone market, DJI's share is as high as 80%, which can be called the absolute hegemony in the field of civil drones.
If it were not for the absolute monopoly on technology, I am afraid that DJI would have been suppressed under the siege of foreign enterprises.
DJI's strength quickly caused panic among Americans, most notably in 2015.
At that time, the President of the United States was still Obama, and in January of that year, in the courtyard of the White House, a DJI drone controlled by the American people slowly landed, which made Obama very panicked.
He believes that if a drone can casually break through the White House's protective system and enter the courtyard, the next time it will be a drone with a bomb strapped to it.
That's when the U.S. began asking the domestic military to ban the purchase of DJI drones.
What americans can't figure out is that the ban not only did not eliminate DJI, but also increased DJI's share of the U.S. civilian drone field.
Before the purchase ban, DJI's share in the United States was 75%, but after the purchase ban, it increased to 80%, and even without listing, the valuation of the company reached 160 billion.
After all, DJI drones have high performance and low prices, who would reject such a good and inexpensive product?
In the face of the reality of DJI's crazy seizure of the US civilian drone market, no matter what kind of purchase ban policy is useless.
What supports all this is the concept of technology patent protection that DJI has been adhering to from beginning to end.
Without the protection of technology patents, DJI is afraid to face competitors with stronger assets, who can achieve overtaking DJI by throwing money.
It is worth mentioning that although it has been repeatedly banned, the United States has never given up the suppression of technology giants such as DJI.
On March 12 this year, the United States once again controlled DJI's drone products, but in order to declare its position, DJI released several new products in one go on the same day, which made many American people envious.
It is understood that these new products are no longer limited to the entertainment of ordinary people, but more focus on practical aspects.
For example, after a forest fire, it can be used to detect trapped people in disaster areas.
After encountering a dangerous situation, it can be used to troubleshoot potential crises.
In short, today's DJI has completely changed from a remote control drone to an all-rounder of multi-field collaboration.
But even so, DJI does not choose to go public for development, after all, if it is invested by foreign-funded enterprises, it is very unsafe for technical protection.
Will DJI be tougher in the face of continued U.S. sanctions in the future?
What do you think?