On April 3, an apology statement about Harry Potter: Magical Awakening reminded many people of the incident at the beginning of the game's launch: Someone was knowing "How to evaluate the mobile game "Harry Potter: Magical Awakening" jointly developed by Warner Bros. and NetEase?" Under this issue, he accused NetEase Games of using the game planning plan attached to its job resume without his permission, and claimed to be the "original author of the game program of Harry Potter Magic Awakening".
While receiving a lot of attention, some enthusiastic netizens politely pointed out that many of the content he felt was "copied" actually had similar designs in other games. For example, regarding the design of the battle interface and the core gameplay, some enthusiastic netizens pointed out that the core combat design of some more classic offline games is almost the same.
(The above picture is a screenshot of the user's game design scheme and the corresponding statement)
(The picture above shows examples of other users)
It shows that whether the game is online or offline, it can be loved by people, and it must have its own shining points that are worth being spread. Most of the game forms and rules are like the basic rhythm of music, in fact, it has long been explored by predecessors. The Harry Potter mobile game also proved itself not to be plagiarized with time and high-quality games, and now, the user has publicly released an apology statement, saying that it was because the public beta of the Harry Potter mobile game was high, so it wanted to take the opportunity to create a controversial topic to attract attention. The cost of spreading false information for a while is that the user needs to bear the corresponding legal responsibility and try to make up for the loss caused by it.