Text/Feng Haitao Painting/Li Peijin
They all say that "paintings are character", and I didn't understand it at the time. But recently, I have realized something because of something. The old ancestor said that "paintings are character" is not simply saying that good people can paint good paintings, and bad people can't look at paintings. It is the character in the painting that looks at the character of the painter. For example, if a person paints very well, but paints someone else's original work, this person has no character at all, and because there is no character, his paintings are only realistic in form, and the painting "no grid overflowing" is that the picture cannot be intentionally generated. And such a person has no moral character in life.
Li Peijin's "Dream Qingdao" series of works
The study of art is a lifelong thing, because a little slackness will not keep up with the aesthetic changes brought about by social progress. The same is true of the cognition of art, when not understanding that "the painting is the character", the perspective of the painting is only the effect of the picture, and ignores the originality of the picture and the infection of the artistic conception. However, after understanding in a trance that "paintings are character", the field of vision suddenly broadened, and when admiring the paintings, as long as the mind is transparent, the focus can be found at a glance. Therefore, it is possible to know whether the author is committable or not.
There is a saying, "Without a thing, without a long wisdom", if I had not encountered the situation of looking at people without knowing, I would not have thought of the phrase "painting is character", and I would not have reflected. The person who has a set on the face and a set on the back originally thought that he would not meet. I always think that I treat others with sincerity, and so do others, but I don't think so. Because, such a person, no matter how much you do, he feels that you should, and he feels that he has suffered a loss when he pays a little. Just as between me and the painter, I write reviews and promote it, a manuscript plus media publicity takes time a day or even two days or three days, they don't feel that you pay, and he paints a picture for hours, or even tens of minutes, such as as giving you a reward, he feels that he has lost a lot.
Recently, working with a painter, I created my own IP for her, wrote text for her, wrote and published every day, and the IP was locked in the painter. Give me a one-square-foot painting one day. But some people said, is it worth it for him to give me so many paintings? I would love to say something rude, isn't my effort worth a flat ruler? You know, the two of us are building this thing, one person for half a day, two people adding up to a day. Isn't our labor remuneration worth a square foot? Speaking of this, I think of what many painters said, now people always have to paint, or take a bottle of wine or some tea leaves to change the painting, scolding people for not knowing the hard work of the painter. But when I come here, won't I work hard? I guess that's a question of character!