Australia has been active since the outbreak of the Russo-Ukrainian War, following in the footsteps of the United States and putting pressure on Russia. However, in recent days, Morrison has targeted China, however, when asked whether he dares to sanction China, he does not talk about his own country, but moves out of the United States, which is really ridiculous.
I have to say that Australian Prime Minister Morrison, this method of "Wang Gu talking about him around" has learned really well. Someone asked him whether Australia dared to sanction China, he did not respond to this topic, but took a detour and said, on this issue, we will follow up on the practices of our allies, and then immediately move the big brother united states out, saying that the United States has a statement on this issue, and Australia will support the united States' approach.
In the end, Morrison did not dare to answer positively, does Australia dare to sanction China? In fact, Morrison himself is very clear that at the height of the epidemic, Australia is in place of the United States to charge forward, everywhere and everything is followed by sewage to China. Then, Australia's wine, beef, timber, international student tourism, all areas with strong ties to China, were hit hard.
So, at the moment, many Australian magistrates, business owners, are complaining to Morrison, hoping that he will not do it again, and if he continues to do it, the country will be doomed.
Therefore, at present, Australia's dilemma, Morrison is very clear, he economic sanctions against Russia, Russia's economy is small, but if you want to sanction China, you have to weigh it. Today's China, whether in the global financial system or in the global economy as a whole, its weight is too heavy.
Therefore, no country dares to act rashly. Even now when the United States says that it wants to sanction China, it does not necessarily have to say so, if China really supports Russia, if China provides military assistance to Russia, it must add such a premise, the United States does not dare to rush to China. Because it is very clear that this kind of reckless sanction will lead to a huge loss of interests for the United States itself and consumers.
In this case, Australian Prime Minister Morrison still turned the topic around. Then, he also followed the example of the United States, that is, to ask China to "clarify" and what kind of military assistance russia has provided, and does he have evidence? Obviously, there is no such thing as the United States, but as long as the big brother of the United States spills dirty water, he has to follow.
In fact, Morrison has made a lot of moves recently, including another $38 billion to strengthen the military by 2040. This is Australia's largest military expenditure since the Vietnam War, that is, since peacetime. In addition, the Morrison government wants to take out 10 billion Australian dollars to serve as a home port for future Australian nuclear submarines, and this port also welcomes American and British submarines to come to their homes at any time.
In addition, Morrison also took out about 500 million Australian dollars to develop rare earths and get rid of dependence on China in the field of very important rare earths. He has done so many things, and it is all to promote the media, and the pro-American and anti-China attitude is very clear, for the Australian election in May this year.
At present, in australia's election, Morrison is not dominant, at a disadvantage. Therefore, in order to stabilize his basic plan, and at the same time use this nationalist sentiment and use the so-called democratic values to pull more voters, he must continue to play the pro-AMERICAN anti-China card.
Because, in the current Western world, it seems that it has been tried and tested many times through anti-China canvassing, but this so-called "anti-China" has made it clear to the country what kind of losses it has to the country in the process of ruling the country.