On March 14, Tesla Motors Sales Service (Beijing) Co., Ltd. filed an application for retrial with the respondent, Han Chao.
According to the content of the application for retrial, the applicant Tesla Automobile Sales Service (Beijing) Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Tesla" or "The Applicant") is dissatisfied with the (2021) Jing 02 Min Zhong No. 2302 Civil Judgment rendered by the Beijing No. 2 Intermediate People's Court in connection with the dispute over the sale and purchase contract with the respondent Han Chao (hereinafter referred to as "Han Chao" or "the Respondent"), and is hereby applying to your court for retrial in accordance with the law.
Tesla put forward two retrial requests in the retrial application, one is to revoke the (2021) Jing 02 Min Zhong No. 2302 Civil Judgment made by the Beijing No. 2 Intermediate People's Court, and to change the judgment to reject all the litigation claims of the respondent Han Chao; the other is to order the respondent Han Chao to bear all the litigation costs of the first and second instance trials of the case.
In this regard, the respondent, Mr. Han Chao, publicly stated that "this side sued me for 5.05 million, and the fraud case was retried", "I would like to see if the cutting and welding vehicle can be reasonably and legally concealed in China and sold at the normal vehicle price!" In addition, the financial network car also contacted Tesla, as of press time, Tesla has not made a public response to this matter.
Original title: Tesla's "refund one pay three" case after losing the second instance to apply for retrial request for revocation of the judgment
Article source: Caijing Network Auto