Tesla "refund one loss three" case should be heard of, recently Tesla Automobile Sales Service (Beijing) Co., Ltd. was exposed to be on March 14 to the respondent Han filed a retrial application, in response to this matter, Tesla responded to the media said "true".
According to the exposed application for trial, the applicant is Tesla Auto Sales Service (Beijing) Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Tesla"), because of the dispute over the sale contract with the respondent Han Mou (Weibo nickname ID_ Han Chao), dissatisfied with the (2021) Jing 02 Min Zhong No. 2302 Civil Judgment made by the Beijing No. 2 Intermediate People's Court, and is now applying to your court for retrial in accordance with the law.
Tesla put forward two retrial requests in the retrial application, one of which was to "revoke the (2021) Jing 02 Min Zhong No. 2302 Civil Judgment made by the Beijing No. 2 Intermediate People's Court and change the judgment to reject all the litigation claims of the respondent Han"; the other was to "order the respondent Han to bear all the litigation costs of the first and second instance trials of the case".
In May 2019, he bought a Tesla Model S officially certified used car on Tesla's official website, but in the process of using it, he found that the car had dozens of safety problems.
After that, Han Chao passed a third-party inspection and found that the second-hand car had cutting and welding problems in the C-pillar and rear fenders, which was actually an accident car
In December 2019, Han Chao took Tesla to court. After filing the case in the Tianjin Hexi Court, Tesla filed a jurisdiction dispute in court, so Han Chao withdrew the lawsuit and went to the Beijing Daxing People's Court to re-appeal.
On December 4, 2020, the Beijing Daxing People's Court ruled that Tesla had committed fraud and should refund one and pay three.
Just two days later, Tesla appealed against the first-instance judgment and was tried by the Beijing No. 2 Intermediate People's Court.
On September 16, 2021, after the second instance trial, the court ruled to reject Tesla's appeal and uphold the original judgment, Tesla refunded one to three, and needed to refund a total of 1.5188 million yuan to Han Chao.
On September 27, Tesla paid compensation of 1.5188 million yuan to the owner Han Chao in accordance with the deadline, which means that the first case of domestic car "return one compensation three" was sentenced to execution.
However, the matter did not end, in September last year, Tesla filed a lawsuit against Han Chao with the Tianjin Beichen District People's Court, claiming that Han Chao had violated Tesla's right to reputation, claiming a total of 5.05 million yuan.
Judging from the current development trend, the Han Chao rights protection incident should not be over in a short period of time.