The so-called cross-level car selection, can be cross-priced, can also cross the level, and even cross the new car and the second-hand car, as long as the two cars have similarities, then you can take it out and compare. And the theme of our cross-level comparison today is how to choose joint ventures and domestic family cars, for this reason, we have also selected models with higher heat in the two camps, the joint venture camp sends Honda Odyssey to play, and the domestic camp sends Wuling Capgemini to meet the battle, both belong to the benchmark models in their respective camps, see what is the gap between them? Or is the gap between Capgemini and Odyssey so big?
in Odyssey
in Capgemini
Hard power is a key part of the family car, so let's just briefly talk about the appearance and interior design style of the two cars. The overall shape of the Odyssey is more square, the design of the short car head is conducive to improving the utilization of space, and the side lines of the Odyssey are more three-dimensional, the overall atmosphere is not excessively commercial, and it highlights the family temperament; the overall design of Capgemini is also more fashionable, and its body lines are more sharp, showing a strong three-dimensional sense, while Capgemini also uses design elements such as split headlights and suspended roofs, and the overall sense of fashion is stronger.
In the interior, the design of the Odyssey is mainly practical, a large number of horizontal lines appear more atmospheric, and its block handles are still arranged in the center console, leaving more spacious storage space for the front row. At the same time, Odyssey uses a suspended central control screen, electronic button block and other designs, the sense of science and technology is doing a good job; Capgemini's interior layout is also relatively regular, its interior also uses a large number of horizontal lines, suspension central control screen can also enhance the overall sense of technology, and its interior uses a large number of piano paint trim panels, the texture is also good.
Space is a key part of today's comparison, and both cars are moderately sized to make daily parking more convenient, but the wheelbase of the Odyssey has some advantages. Since the size of both cars is not small, the front space of both is relatively generous, and even Capgemini's horizontal space is still small.
Odyssey uses a 2+2+3 seven-seat layout, Capgemini has a 2+2+2 six-seat layout, and the second row of both uses independent seats, and both support adjustment, both of which are spacious and have a large adjustment range. In terms of the function of the second row of seats, the Odyssey seat supports front and rear, backrest, left and right adjustment, and Capgemini has more leg rest adjustment, and the comfort performance of the two is not much different.
Due to the obvious advantages of the wheelbase of the Odyssey, the third row of legroom is also relatively generous, and Capgemini is just enough to meet the needs of adults. But the Odyssey is more general in width, and in fact the third row is more suitable for two people, but its third row of seats with a "fishing" mode will be more practical.
In terms of the trunk, the third row of seats of both cars can be stored under the floor, which can give Odyssey and Capgemini praise, and the trunk expansion of both is very good.
Configuration is a key part of improving the car experience, safety configuration, Odyssey is equipped with 4 airbags, Capgemini is 6, while Odyssey with lane keeping assist, active braking and other functions, Capgemini only with active braking function, both equipped with full-speed adaptive cruise function; intelligent networking, both cars with vehicle networking, OTA upgrade function, and both can achieve voice interaction, online navigation function, but Capgemini replaced with Ling OS Lingxi system, its voice controllable function will be more abundant, Supports continuous speech recognition.
In terms of power, Odyssey adopts honda i-MMD hybrid system, which is equipped with a 2.0L engine, with a front-mounted motor, and matches the E-CVT electronic transmission, the maximum power of the system is 158kW, and the fuel consumption of the vehicle WLC is 5.88L/100km; Capgemini adopts a combination of 1.5T engine + CVT gearbox, and its engine maximum power is 130kW, the maximum torque is 290N·m, and the vehicle WLMTC fuel consumption is 8.3L/100km. In contrast, the power output gap between the two cars is not large, but the economy of the Odyssey has obvious advantages.
Summary: From the perspective of basic product strength, Odyssey and Capgemini as family cars, both of which are qualified, and even in their respective price points, the performance of both is excellent. In terms of space, the overall performance gap between Odyssey and Capgemini is not large, but the practicality of Odyssey has some advantages, and the comfort of Capgemini's second row has some advantages; in terms of configuration, the intelligent technology configuration of Odyssey and Capgemini is not much different; in terms of power, Odyssey's economy has obvious advantages. Overall, if you are biased towards a joint venture brand, then Odyssey is definitely a better choice, but if you value cost performance and practicality, then Capgemini will be more suitable.