Hello everyone.
I say two words. These days, there are more people, and the group is very lively.
Such an atmosphere is good.
However, part of the function of this group is to maintain the communication of column learners.
I hope you pay more attention to the feedback of beginners' questions.
I feel that everyone is very enthusiastic, and I have to talk to everyone yesterday. This is not conducive to problematic publishing.
Because my time is not fixed, the time of appearance is not certain.
Sometimes you can't look at everyone's questions one by one, everyone helps each other, and communication is the original intention of establishing a group.
The updated column I will send to the group, the usual short video will not be sent, everyone is interested in watching.
Yesterday's update is the ninth chapter of the poetry analysis column II, and today we update the tenth chapter of the poetry column II. For the average communicator, there are no requirements. But column learners, please read carefully.
Because we will gradually break away from the simple creation of grammatical poetry and enter the analysis and integration of poetic styles. That is to say, the next step may begin to talk about the history of poetry, and now it will gradually lean upwards. Let everyone have a comprehensive understanding of the development of poetry and truly improve the level of poetry creation.
I don't support activities such as looking at pictures and writing poems, but propositional composition is only suitable for format training and has little use for mind activation.
To really write good poetry, we must put our minds into life and into history.
What I want is to help people establish a correct view of poetry, not just see a painting and write two sentences.
Note that I am not against this type of word game. But speaking of breaking the sky, this is just a word game.
It's like saying that the old dry body is deeply resentful. But the hardest thing to write well is the old stem.
The key is to break through this layer of understanding.
Usually, everyone organizes itself, which is not bad, but I hope that since you are a proposition and look at the picture, then you must arrange the format.
There is no connotation anyway. To put it mildly, turn over the poems from last night to today, which one has connotations?
It doesn't matter if there is no connotation, then we will practice the format.
Then when there is really a feeling touch, the format is based, the emotion is vigorous, and the good work will naturally come out.
It is important to distinguish where the boundaries between word games and poetic expression of emotion lie.
Games can be there, but they are by no means the right way.
I believe that most of my friends watch my videos, one is the format, and the other is that poetry analysis has opinions and pursuits.
Although my appreciation direction is not necessarily correct, I have thinking and can activate a certain direction of thinking.
In fact, the history of poetry is usually told in a sloppy and gray line when appreciating, but there is no system.
In fact, to really talk about the history of poetry, Tang Qian is the most important. The Wei and Jin Dynasties and the Southern and Northern Dynasties were the period of real great development of poetry.
Originally, I opened a column on poetry history combined with children's memorization of poems, and wrote a few articles that no one read, which was very transparent at that time, and it was suspended without sales.
I sincerely hope that everyone will have a macro view of poetry, beyond the perspective of word games to look at the spiritual culture left to us by our ancestors.
China's literature, history and philosophy are inseparable, and we can completely see history from poetry.
Don't dwell on trivial things.
Only when the real spirit is raised, you will find the dispute between words, the controversy of grammar, the controversy of rhyme.
Both TM are not worth mentioning.
Note that at this time. There will be people who are limited to these disputes who will come together and say that you will not give me face.
Where is it? Facelessness is all about their own thoughts.
In Zhuangzi's heart, in Lao Tzu's heart, heaven and earth are not benevolent and all things are dogs.
It is not to see others as dogs, but to treat dogs or people, there is no difference for Lao Tzu.
This is a very high realm, in fact, it is the same when writing poetry.
When you go beyond the level of others and look back at those disputes, it's really not worth mentioning.
Lao Tzu and Zhuangzi, on the other hand, took a different approach.
Lao Tzu ignored it and drifted west. Zhuangzi was cold-eyed and enthusiastic, educating the people.
It's a long way off.
In fact, I hope that everyone will make up for their shortcomings more and not indulge in word games.
The game must have rules, but how to go beyond the rules is what we have to study.
For now, everyone's inscription and painting poems have no meaning, so we will practice the format and rules.
Don't forget what you get in word games, that's what matters.
I have a Confucian column, and I have also considered writing a column, but many of them can't be passed, so I give up.
As for the Buddhists, there were more restrictions, and later the focus was on poetry.
There is no need to choose the best group, and I don't have that much energy.
Come and talk occasionally, or see questions that are answered once in a while.
But like this kind of word game, I can't give an opinion. I don't bother with everyone's interest in the game, but I hope that you will find improvements in the game.
Writing something at this level, if you can make a format practice to improve, it is not impossible.
But to be complacent, you don't have to.
Don't let your mind rest on shallow word games.