College entrance examination Beijing volume essay real questions

2020 college entrance examination Beijing volume essay real questions

　　Whether in school or in society, everyone always has to contact or use composition, composition according to different genres can be divided into narrative, expository, applied, argumentative essay. In order to make it easier and more convenient for you to write an essay, the following is the 2020 college entrance examination Beijing volume essay real questions carefully sorted out by the editor, for reference only, let's take a look at it.

　　Choose one of the following two questions and answer as required. Not less than 700 words. Copy the question on the answer card.

　　(1) On June 23, 2020, the last satellite of Beidou-3 was successfully launched, marking the completion of the global networking deployment of China's independently built and independently operated Beidou satellite navigation system. The entire system consists of 55 satellites, each of which has its own function, and together they weave a "Skynet" that can serve the world.

　　"Each one has its own function" in the material, what kind of associations and thinking have you aroused? Please contact real life, choose your own perspective, write your own topic, and write an argumentative essay.

　　Requirements: Clear arguments, substantial arguments, reasonable arguments; fluent language and clear writing.

　　Beidou-3 satellite

　　The Beidou-3 satellite navigation system consists of 24 medium-circle Earth orbit satellites, 3 geostationary orbit satellites and 3 inclined geosynchronous orbit satellites, a total of 30 satellites.

　　The Beidou-3 satellite navigation system provides two types of services, namely open services and authorized services. The open service is to provide free positioning, speed measurement and timing services in the service area, with a positioning accuracy of 10 meters, a timing accuracy of 50 nanoseconds, and a speed measurement accuracy of 0.2 meters per second. Authorization services are to provide authorized users with more secure positioning, speed measurement, timing and communication services and system integrity information.

　　At 2:07 a.m. on November 19, 2018, China successfully launched the 42nd and 43rd Beidou navigation satellites in the Xichang Satellite Launch Center with the Long March 3B carrier rocket in the form of "one arrow and two stars". On December 27, the Beidou-3 basic system was completed and began to provide global services.

　　On June 23, 2020, the last global networking satellite of Beidou-3 was ignited and launched at the Xichang Satellite Launch Center.

　　Interpretation of the real question:

　　Seeing this topic, I thought about some problems in education and made a little comment.

　　55 satellites form a "Skynet", each of which has the function of each one, and then jointly provides users with services such as "positioning, navigation, and timing".

　　In education, should we not do the same, let each star play the advantages of each star, each star has the function of each star, rather than making them exactly the same, are carved out of a mold?

　　There is a chapter in the Analects of Yongye VI:

　　Ji Kangzi asked, "Nakayu can make politics also related to?" Zi Yue: "From also fruit, what is the matter with the government" Said: "Can also make the government also with the gift?" He said, "What is the point of giving it to Yeda, and what is the matter with being engaged in politics?" "Asking for help can also make politics also related?" "Why do you want to be in politics?" ”

　　This is a dialogue between Ji Kangzi, a minister of power in the State of Lu, and Confucius. Ji Kangzi asked the same question, both asking Confucius, whether your student so-and-so can "engage in politics" (governing political affairs). And Confucius's answers are also completely consistent, all of which are "what is the difficulty in letting him govern political affairs?"). Quiz, No problem.

　　Although the questions are exactly the same and the final answers are identical, the process of argumentation, or reason, is different.

　　"Yuya Guo" (Zhongyu Guodang decision), "Zhi Ye Da" (Duanmu Zhi Tong Da Ming Li) "Qiu Ye Yi" (Ran Qiu multi-talented), this is Confucius's reason for whether these few of his disciples can "engage in politics".

　　Seeing this, I can't help but have a few questions that arouse my thinking.

　　1. They are all "engaged in politics", but they still need people with different characteristics to play their own strengths. If "engaging in politics" is analogous to the Beidou Skynet, then Zilu, Zigong, and Ran have these students who are not each with different functions. Satellites?

　　2. Teaching according to aptitude makes each student of Confucius have his own characteristics. Just like satellites with different functions, they also need to come from different molds. If we all use the exact same production line, the exact same mold, can we create these different satellites?

　　3. Confucius's evaluation of students is not excessively praiseworthy, not too modest, seeking truth from facts, but there is self-confidence between the lines. This is the result of Confucius's long-term teaching according to his aptitude. Beidou Skynet, serving the world, what does it rely on? Not to brag, but to be realistic.

　　Confucius is more than 2,500 years away from us, but today, Confucius's educational ideas are still worthy of our serious study and serious thinking.

　　Whether it is a fast horse or a slow cow, the same whip is used to pump hard, is this OK? Whether it is a rabbit or a turtle, the same requirement is to run fast, is this OK?

　　No way! Everybody knows no! Teach according to your aptitude! It should be noted that whether it is a thousand, or ten thousand, or even one hundred million, one billion screws with exactly the same specifications, no matter how exquisite, it is impossible to form the Beidou Skynet.

　　But today, are we really teaching according to our talents? Teaching according to aptitude requires a change in the teacher's concept and the implementation of actions.

　　Of course, the teacher may also have the teacher's own unspeakable bitterness, because a little out of line, a little bit of his own ideas and practices, may "show the wood in the forest, the wind will destroy it."

　　So what? The teacher completely covers up his personality, goes with the flow, follows the crowd, does what he prescribes, does what he asks, in a word, is to "obey". Never thinking about or daring to touch on these regulations or whether these requirements conform to the basic laws of education, let alone talk about teaching according to aptitude.

　　Today, the college entrance examination essay starts from the Beidou Skynet, and every satellite has the function of each satellite. In fact, back to education, it is nothing more than a cliché, teaching according to aptitude. However, the more common sense, the more we have to talk about it, because not everyone understands common sense, and everyone respects common sense.

　　So how to let more people understand common sense and respect common sense? Without him, the sun arches a pawn, never compromise!