Why is it that the reporters in front of us are always seeing an illusion? Before Russia announced its recognition of the independence of Donetsk and Luhansk, that is, before the deployment of Russian troops, there were front reporters reporting that a large number of Russian troops had entered Donee

Why is it that the reporters in front of us are always seeing an illusion? Before Russia announced its recognition of the independence of Donetsk and Luhansk, that is, before the deployment of the Russian army, there were reporters from the front who reported that a large number of Russian troops were marching into Donetsk and Luhansk, but then Putin said: "I did not say that our army is going to the Donbass region now." Dennis Pushlin, the leader of the Donetsk People's Republic, said that there are currently no Russian troops in the republic, and that before that, all international observers had looked for them here, including the OSCE itself, but had not found them. As for the future, is there a russian presence? When and under what circumstances will be proved by the situation. ”

Who's panicking? There is no evidence. Is what the reporter saw with his own eyes true? Not necessarily. In the stage of war, what reporters see is never all true, war is organized, military operations, and the deployment of troops are highly confidential, interviews and reports are controlled, even if reporters are allowed to accompany the army to interview, it is impossible for reporters to look at them casually, and most of what reporters can see is the illusion of being "arranged", and even deliberately let reporters report in the opposite direction in order to tempt the enemy, which is what people often say about public opinion warfare. So let's not be fooled by the so-called front reports. Reporters should not rush to report without analysis. Wait for the situation to change, otherwise it is fake news, losing the authenticity of the news, and the audience will never get the truth.