Families planning to do IVF are often hesitant between Thailand and domestic IVF, although the TEST tube technology in the United States is better, but because the cost is higher and the distance is farther, most of them are directly skipped. Hengjian Overseas pointed out that Thailand is favored by many families because of its close distance, high success rate and high cost performance, but the current technology in China is getting better and better, and the price is more affordable and more convenient, which has also become the choice of many people. At this time, the difference in costs becomes an important reference data for how to choose.
How much does it cost in Thailand and in China?
First of all, in the choice of technology, domestic test tube technology many local hospitals are still using a generation of IVF, if necessary, will use ICSI technology, the third generation due to the need for more proof, more audits, to wait a long time, so the people who do it are relatively few. The first and second generation of test tube costs are mostly in the range of 30,000 to 50,000, plus if you choose a local hospital, you can save hospitalization costs and living expenses, so it looks like it only costs 20,000 or 30,000 yuan to do test tubes in China.
The third generation of test tube technology currently used in Thailand is definitely more expensive than the first and second generations, and the medical expenses are about 70,000 to 90,000 yuan, plus the cost of food, accommodation and transportation during the test tube in Thailand, so it is higher than the domestic one. However, if the same is to do three generations of test tubes, then the domestic medical expenses are about 70,000 or 80,000, the difference is not very large.
What are the main differences between different fees?
Compared with the third generation of Thailand, the first and second generation of test tubes used in China are all cultivated through artificial conception, but the former is a fertilized egg transfer, and the Thai test tube is a blastocyst transfer after the vesicle, so there is an extra cost of raising a sac here. And the third generation also has more PGS screening before transplantation, so it is necessary to raise sacs, the purpose is to screen out unqualified blastocysts, select good quality transplants, ensure the success rate, in addition to detecting hidden chromosomal problem blastocysts, to prevent the continuation of genetic diseases. Therefore, the main difference in cost lies in the pre-transplant test, but in exchange for a higher success rate and a series of advantages.
Of course, the advantages and disadvantages depend on the individual, and the key is to look at their own economic conditions and fertility requirements. If you do not need to use third-generation technology to help conceive, and there is no requirement for gender, you can naturally choose a lower cost of first- and second-generation test tubes, and if there are requirements for success rates and personalized fertility, you can also try a third-generation test tube in Thailand or China.