There is no such thing as "scar literature" in the literary classification
The so-called "scar literature" is actually an "anti-social" and "anti-human" pirated version.
As a materialist view of human history, has there never been a glory in human history without suffering? The origin of mankind is a history of hard work and hard work. From wearing no clothes to wearing book skins; from wearing bark and grass leaves to weaving clothes; from living in caves to learning to build; from thatched huts to 1,000-meter tall buildings; from hunting and eating raw meat to the delicious culture on the tip of today's tongue; from war to peace; from barbarism to civilization; human history has grown up from suffering.
Don't mention suffering, like how? How did it drip? All suffering has become a "scar"? Without revealing the scars, you wouldn't have the "happiness" you have today? Happy life is created by human beings, not by "scar literature" to reveal scars.
In difficult times, don't our leaders share the weal and woe of the people? The people have no meat to eat, and don't the leaders not eat meat? Where is there sweetness without bitterness? The world is made by the people, not by sitting back and enjoying its success.
Therefore, Lenin said long ago: "Forgetting the past means betrayal"!
