If the stars in the sky suddenly move faster than the speed of light, rearrange to form a sentence - "Hey, I am God", and remain in this state forever, then can it prove the existence of God?
Of course not! The rearrangement of stars could lead to the destruction of the universe so that no one could prove the existence of God.
Stars are not holes in the black curtain above our heads!
Stars have different distances from each other!
The planets of the solar system all orbit the stars of the sun!
The Earth is a sphere, not a flat circle!
There is more than one language in the world!
Based on these facts, your hypothesis does not hold!
Assuming that God does want to greet us in this way, that means that all the stars seen from Earth should be rearranged at faster than the speed of light. This will certainly affect the mass of the star, and the energy generated in the process may eventually destroy it.
Assuming these stars survive, the planets orbiting them will move with the same risk as above. Even if the planet is not destroyed in motion, life on the planet will be affected. There could be a mass extinction, or the civilization there could disappear as a result.
Not to mention that gravitational changes can cause collisions between stars or galaxies, especially when every star must be near and far at the same time in order for people on Earth to see every "star letter" at the same time.
Why toss the universe so much?
The stars in the northern and southern hemispheres are different, is this just to say hello to English speakers in one hemisphere on Earth?
Rearranging stars is a catastrophic, impractical, and stupid way to communicate, especially if you're just using it to send messages to a few people on Earth without regard to the feelings or well-being of others.
So what would you think if God relocated the earth just to say hello to aliens?
If God had really existed, He would have communicated with us in a more effective and direct way, but He didn't do it, so He doesn't exist either.
This situation only proves that there is some kind of force either inside the star or outside it, but we can't fully understand its nature yet.
Many religions, including those that are no longer mainstream, such as Greek or Roman mythology as we know them, seem to have been the result of people observing the world. But often people get results that don't conform to scientific logic, because scientists don't just make assumptions about the causes that lead to the results, but slowly confirm and test them after the hypothesis. Even if the results of one test pass, they will continue to verify it repeatedly to avoid the accidentality of the results. In addition, other scientists will also conduct independent tests and disproofs to ensure the uniqueness of the conclusions.
Therefore, the rearrangement and combination of stars does not directly prove the existence of God.
What is the Word of God? There are so many languages in the world, which one will he choose?
Any self-respecting God would not violate his own laws of physics (faster than the speed of light) for something so childish and narrow.
In Carl Sagan's science fiction novel Contact, scientists use the decimal system to parse π, and when 1020 decimal places are calculated, a series of combinations of 0s and 1s appear. The sequence is the square of a very large prime number. When these 0s and 1s are placed in a phalanx, 1 occupies all four sides, while all other points are 0s. Thus, bridges with a perimeter and radius— π, contain images that embody the perimeter. π has no practical meaning mathematically, but it is a wonderful existence. Deciphering the universe's information may be hidden in other fundamental constants, waiting for our discovery.
Of course, there are no clues yet.
Many of the answers to this question are strange. Some people's answers are based on the impossibility of the event, and others use science to concoct pseudoscience. But that's not the point, because answering this question from a scientific point of view is itself a strange beginning. If the stars were really rearranging at a faster-than-light speed, I think all the scientific knowledge we know could be left unlearned.
Moreover, if there were creatures that could move stars at incomprehensible speeds, I'm sure he or she, they would be very good at maintaining the balance between the stars and the universe. This may not necessarily prove the existence of God, but at least it shows that we are not alone in the universe. As an atheist, as long as these creatures are not malicious, I find both answers acceptable.
BY: quora
FY: Busy North Gate
If there is any infringement of the relevant content, please contact the author to delete it after the work is published
Please also obtain authorization to reprint, and pay attention to maintaining completeness and indicating source