Brain holes! What if space is fake?

There are many magical places in outer space, and sometimes it's hard for you to understand them. From brilliant nebulae to distant galaxies visible to the naked eye, to the phenomenon of "black holes" that even our greatest scientific minds cannot fully explain, there are still many unsolved mysteries.

But what if all this wasn't real?

Today we come together to explore an extraordinary question: What if space is fake?

Surprisingly, a considerable number of people doubt the term "outer space" and, more precisely, the relationship between humans and it. For decades, conspiracy theories about the 1969 moon landing and all other lunar landing programs, including a wide variety of space missions, have emerged.

According to a 2019 Satellite Network survey, 10 percent of Americans still believe the moon landing is a hoax, despite overwhelming evidence that this is not the case. In line with the "moon landing" deniers are the "flat earth" believers, who hold a different set of beliefs about the rest of the universe. While some say that other planets are absolutely spheres and only Earth is not, others will think that the other world may be a cleverly angled disk, or even an elaborate mirage.

Although most people accept the fact that the Earth is absolutely round and orbits the sun, just like all other planets. But if these conspiracy theories that space itself is not true have credibility, what kind of world will we live in? We must first think clearly about how space can be forged in this parallel world.

There are simulation theories that show that our entire reality is a well-crafted illusion that provides the simplest basis for forging something like "outer space." Here, the space is "rendered", using the same meticulous approach as in other environments around us. Stars, moons, planets and asteroids are man-made. This could even explain why we are the only planet that has been confirmed to have life, simply because the simulation designers (whoever they are) have spent so much time and effort designing different alien species to explain life outside the digital biome we call "Earth."

Oxford University professor Nick Bostrom, the first to delve into the simulation hypothesis, thinks that future people may be enough to provide the computing power to run a realistic version of The Sims. He also asked us to think, how likely are we to live in the real world and have a chance to create a civilization that simulates the world? Is it possible that we are the "Sims" who live in The Sims and are created by others?

Bostrom believes that the latter is more logical throughout time and space! But if we do live in the digital world, does that mean space is also fake?

To some extent, space, like other substances as we know it, is still real, but some things must exist outside of simulation. Someone has to create this space based on something. So, another understanding of simulation theory might be that even if our reality is false, it's very much like space—the real universe—that exists in some form "outside" of the wider universe. While this is not the so-called "false space" we are looking for, this strange idea may explain some important cosmic mysteries (as far as we understand it).

Everything in "outer space" is far away from us, and it is almost impossible for us to touch. We've been to the moon a handful of times and haven't found much important, even though Mars and Venus (the nearest planet adjacent to us) are just as distant and risky to us. If space is nothing more than an illusion or some kind of structure (even if it actually exists), then it makes sense that the people who designed them wanted to make them as dangerous and inaccessible as possible in order to prevent us from going there to find out the truth.

If you think along this line of thinking, in some ways our fledgling process of space travel fits into this hypothesis. For example, as soon as we discovered that Venus had a highly toxic atmosphere, we did not launch another probe. If our efforts to explore Mars also fail, it may ultimately prevent us from exploring space. You see, these speculations about space are more likely to be realistic. But to be clear, we're not saying that space is actually fake. As new as we are to everything in space, it does exist.

From another point of view, when people make up something, doesn't that illustrate how much we believe in its authenticity in life? Take, for example, the infamous "Mars One Colonization Program." Over the years, how many people have been deceived into believing that one day it will come true. The public-facing fund-raising program is said to carry people to the "Red Planet," and despite numerous experts pointing out flaws, many people choose to believe it. The plan does not speak of the preparation of equipment nor the training of astronauts, and its abortion seems reasonable.

One person familiar with the matter even revealed that the selection of so-called "astronauts" was based on the amount of money donated by the candidates and not other (such as space experience). This huge hoax shows that it is not impossible to fabricate a space program. When it is questionable, why do people follow such tasks so quickly and blindly? In a world where space is proven to be fictional, all space programs are, of course, false. Without exception. And that raises a lot of questions. One of the most critical questions is, who made up these plans, for what, and what did they want? We know that when some people go to great lengths to convince the public that there is a universe close to infinity in the sky overhead, it must be profitable.

And the most immediate reason may be money. Imagine how much NASA and the rest of the space agencies have benefited from implementing the so-called program. Therefore, if these space programs are just a lie, that is, the "grand conspiracy" claimed by the advocates of the horizon theory, they must be only a tool for high-level wealth collection. We can't tell you why, when people find out that it's all just a lie, there are still people who choose to believe it? At the same time, the most critical question that follows may be how to explain the thousands of years of research on stars in history, but until the advent of space agencies, people remained silent. In the long history, why have people been so silent to guard their fantasies about the universe? Is it because those who fictionalize space have so much power that they can use their connections and resources to make up the entire history of mankind?

It is inevitable that if all people on Earth had such great influence, then the rest of the planet would fall into chaos – all would be tormented by the instability and suspicion of existence. As for who are these cosmic fallacies? Well, there are some speculations about this aspect. On the one hand, it is possible that the concept of the universe has been instilled into our consciousness by a higher level of power; on the other hand, this higher force cannot be alien (at least not our world), because there are no extraterrestrial planets for them to work on, so it cannot be them. No, for the one thing that "the universe is not real", its "falsehood" must have originated on the earth itself.

Perhaps the answer lies in the extreme conspiracy theory that the world is run by a secret race like the Lizardmen. My point is that at this moment, in an alternate space-time situation where the universe is not our universe, we will imagine that it can be right. Back in the real world, a public policy survey conducted in 2013 found that about 4 percent of Americans (or twelve million at the time) believed in the existence of lizardmen. So, maybe they, these lizard-men who have evolved to be like us, are the spreaders of the lies of the universe. Maybe the reason behind this huge illusion is not so vicious.

Perhaps, after all, the universe is just some sort of sacred structure, and those who say that "the role of science is to separate human beings from God" are ultimately right — a 2015 U.S. survey found that 29 percent of evangelists believed. In this alternative fact, science is generally considered a hoax, and anyone who pursues it is considered to be led to the "wrong path", although we emphasize that this is a very "alternative" fact. But as far as we know, we can still rely on science, and the universe is real.

If we really prove that everything is false, then our understanding of the universe will return to the original point, and so will our understanding of other things! This is what would have happened if the universe had been false, unless we dismissively thought it was just another conspiracy theory at that time and continued to do our own thing, then such a thing as a cognitive cut back to square one would not happen.

fy: Chebyshev has a tree, Erwin, stars catcher, methylpyridine, snail