laitimes

Feng Yuxiang's expulsion of Puyi from the Forbidden City was very correct, which was to protect the interests of the people

Feng Yuxiang's move was correct both at that time and in later generations, because Feng Yuxiang's behavior declared that "the remnants of the Qing Dynasty were politically dispersed", so that the old and the young had no "sustenance" and could only recite the so-called noble birth in the future generations. China is not suitable for a "constitutional monarchy" because it does not conform to the national characteristics of the Chinese. It also advises some people to daydream less.

(1) Some people say that Feng Yuxiang's move may have won the face of the "republic" on the surface, but in the end he lost the national interest, which is to gain more than to lose. This view is wrong, and he is obviously blinded by the "reasons for treason" that later included the "former Xuantong Emperor" and zheng Xiaoxu and others: puyi must of course be criticized for the first half of his life, and respect for the second half of his life

If you want to "betray the country and seek glory", you have your own reasons for how to say it. I was not forced out of the Forbidden City, and I still wanted the "Tanglin Thief"!

Feng Yuxiang's expulsion of Puyi from the Forbidden City was very correct, which was to protect the interests of the people

There was no forced out of the Forbidden City, the Tanglin Thieves, and the "Emperor's Divorce" that made the Emperor lose his face in front of the world. There are also various "Qing Emperor abdications", because of various etiquette or other aspects of the details will also find a reason for "traitor".

The traitorous behavior of the Qing Dynasty's widows and widows in the northeast is essentially unwilling to lose power, and he wants to regain the world or part of the world! If they have not been expelled from the Forbidden City, they will all do so! What an excuse at all!

(2) Some people also said that the "Amendment to the Preferential Conditions for Qing Dynasty" was a contract document, and Feng Yuxiang and the Republic of China government unilaterally breached the contract: this is even more nonsense. This contract document itself was given by Yuan Shikai in order to maximize the strength and maintain the strength, Yuan Shikai's Beiyang government is the object of overthrow, what is the thing he signed, and what is the spirit of the contract? If it is not in line with the will of the people, it is a contract that harms the people, and it must be continued? Then I will overthrow you and do what you did: the old and young widows of the Qing court obviously did not know gratitude

Among the dynasties in Chinese history, the most fortunate of the dynasties that were overthrown were the Qing Dynasty. This is first of all to be thankful for the times. Because China is weak, it has been bullied and humiliated by the great powers.

Feng Yuxiang's expulsion of Puyi from the Forbidden City was very correct, which was to protect the interests of the people

The revolutionary party headed by Sun Yat-sen, whether you say that the strength is not good, or that it is better to optimize the road for the nation, finally agreed to Yuan Shikai's preferential treatment of the Qing Dynasty. But in the end, Yuan Shikai himself "called the emperor" and became the emperor, which undermined his own legitimacy and became a "thief of the country" that everyone could blame.

In this case, what is the number of contracts he signed.

The spirit of the contract has never been counted in civilian use, in politics and in international relations. The strong maintain effectiveness because it is good for themselves, and when it is not good for themselves, they will sabotage it under various pretexts. The best manifestation of this reality is what the United States and its president are doing now.

Feng Yuxiang's expulsion of Puyi from the Forbidden City was very correct, which was to protect the interests of the people

Excuse me? Do the Americans, the British (who gave the various indigenous languages and English in the process of slaughtering and invading other countries differ greatly from English, thus plundering New Zealand, Australia, and other regions) have a contractual spirit?

People often say that "the world changes with the passage of time", when you abdicated in 1912, there were still many people in the national mood towards the Qing Dynasty, whether out of interest or "loyal to the king". But by 1924, how many people would still have it? The world has changed, and the old and the young still dream of returning to the Forbidden City, obsessive dreams!

Read on