When Huawei is mentioned, I believe that many people's inner national emotions have risen again. It is true that we do not deny Huawei's contribution, nor do we deny its identity as a national brand, but it is really ugly to blindly suppress a number of domestic brands. Taking the machine circle as an example, before Huawei was suppressed, what the state of the mobile phone circle was, I think everyone knows. Now, there is really much harmony, and I think this is the unity that a nation should have.
However, after the defeat of the circle, Huawei's ambitions seem to have not been satisfied. Huawei's entry into the car circle is not a secret, it was quite low-key before, but at the winter flagship new product launch held by Huawei on December 23, Huawei did things again. At the meeting, AITO asked the world M5 to debut, but compared to the product, more interesting is the golden sentence of "Yu Dazui":
1, the chassis of our car is the chassis of high-end Millionaire;
2, some manufacturers are still using 1.3 liter three-cylinder machine, everyone's engine must be at least four-cylinder, buy a car must not buy three-cylinder.
3, I think the engine should not be equipped with three cylinders, should be equipped with four, six, eight, ten, twelve and so on
4, the McPherson suspension driving feeling, that is simply not good
5. The mileage is seconds to kill all pure trams
6, 0-50km/h, 1.9 seconds to eject
7, the performance of our car crushes all fuel vehicles, but also more than many electric vehicles
Seeing these "golden sentences", some people actually said that the grass had been planted, and my heart was really MMP. Let me analyze his golden sentences one by one for you!!!
Part1: Is it really the chassis of a high-end Millionaire car?
Huawei's press release is how to introduce the chassis of the car, "the all-aluminum alloy chassis adopts the front double wishbones, the rear multi-link independent suspension, comparable to the million-level luxury car, and can still maintain good stability and comfort under extreme control."
First of all, the all-aluminum alloy chassis, the chassis is a very metaphysical thing, such as the bearing body, in fact, the overall frame and chassis are connected together, so the vehicle body and rigidity are closely related. Therefore, as far as the load-bearing body is concerned, the chassis is not only the longitudinal beam, front overhang, rear overhang, etc., but also its A\B\C column is also part of the chassis. Another example is the non-load-bearing body, its chassis and body are separated, so the chassis of the non-load-bearing body is the girder, front overhang, rear suspension that everyone knows, and the upper frame does not include the chassis. So for this AITO M5, it must be a load-bearing body, can you be sure that its entire frame is made of 100% aluminum, how much do you know about this cost?
As far as I know, there are very few people who actually use 100% all-aluminum frames now, such as Jaguar Land Rover (higher-grade cars are high-tech steels such as carbon fiber). Because it uses a load-bearing body, it is an all-aluminum alloy car "body", the body, the body, the body !!! Other so-called all-aluminum frames, most of which use a mix of steel and aluminum frames. Seeing this, everyone should understand that regarding the all-aluminum alloy chassis, Huawei is playing a word game.
Speaking of the independent suspension of the front double wishbones and the rear multi-link, do you think this is only available in a Million Luxury car? What about the Giulia with the same configuration, the car is priced at 379,800 yuan, and the offer is very large. Another example is our own brand, GAC Trumpchi GA8, which is priced at only 151,800 yuan, also adopts a combination of independent suspension of the front double wishbone and independent suspension of the rear multi-link. Oh my God, GAC Trumpchi is actually a million-level, too conscientious.
Finally, let's talk about the limit control, which is not yet known, but if you have a bold friend, you can try its limit, but remember to buy insurance first.
Part2: Must not buy a three-cylinder when buying a car?
I know that the Chinese people are very prejudiced against the three-cylinder engine, which is undeniable. But from a product point of view, in today's environment, existence is reasonable, because it is a product of policy. Just like Nissan New Qijun, it is also forced by the policy and forced by the pressure of emission points and helpless choice. As for whether this three-cylinder Qijun is "fun" in the desert, I don't know.
Again, "the engine must be at least four-cylinder," I don't know if he thinks the three-cylinder engine is not good or the performance is not good.
First of all, the quality, I think the list of Ward's top ten engines, which is very authoritative in the industry, is enough to punch the face, and the 2021 Chevrolet 1.3T inline three-cylinder engine is on the list, which is excellent in terms of jitter suppression and thermal efficiency. In addition, like Ford's 1.5T three-cylinder engine, both performance and stability are very good, you have the opportunity to go to the 4S store to actually experience it.
Speaking of performance, you say that the performance of the three cylinders is not good? Ford Focus's 1.5T three-cylinder engine, the maximum horsepower is 174 horses, the peak torque is 243 Nm; for example, toyota GR Yaris, its 1.6T turbo engine, the maximum horsepower of 261 hp, peak torque of 360 Nm, this power data can be said to exceed many 2.0T engines on the market. In addition, everyone may forget Koenigsegg's Gemera, this car is also equipped with a three-cylinder engine, and with the blessing of the motor, it can burst out a staggering 598 horsepower and 600 Nm peak torque.
Back to our protagonist AITO asked the world M5, this 1.5T four-cylinder engine, the maximum horsepower is only 125 horses, a few years ago the domestic 1.5T engine is stronger than you, and the first few three-cylinder which does not press you to the ground and rub? So, is it Liang Jingru who gave you the courage to say that three cylinders can't work?
Part3: Shouldn't the engine be equipped with a three-cylinder?
Engines should be equipped with 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 cylinder engines; yes, everyone likes multi-cylinder engines, but do you know how high the development cost and manufacturing cost of six-cylinder and more engines are? Why don't you give this AITO M5 a twelve-cylinder engine and sell it for more than two hundred thousand?
What makes me most angry is why many car companies now do not develop large-displacement engines, the reason is environmental protection and emissions. It is worth mentioning that at present, our country is promoting energy conservation and emission reduction, which is why the National VI standard is so strict. In this context, you are advocating large-displacement engines here, blatantly against the will of the country, what is your intention?
Part 4: The driving feel of the McPherson suspension doesn't work at all?
You say McPherson suspension doesn't work, okay. BMW 3 Series, Porsche 911 these two cars are no stranger to everyone, the former is the handling benchmark in the family car, the latter is the sports car industry benchmark, they use the former McPherson suspension. Where did you get the courage to say that the McPherson suspension didn't work?
Part5: Mileage seconds to kill all pure trams? truly!
Isn't it normal for range extender models to have a battery life spike pure electric model? Can this all blow? The AITO M5 has a range of 1195km (NEDC) and 1242 (CLTC), which are two different range standards. Yes, this mileage is indeed very cattle, but is it appropriate to use the word "spike"? On the "chestnut", Geely Xingyue L oil-electric hybrid version in the case of full oil maximum endurance of 1300km, please ask you "second kill" in what place, bragging about the second kill?
Part6: 0-50km/h in just 1.9 seconds!
Wow, so fast, but don't forget, this result is 0-50km/h, why don't you put 0-100km/h speed? To put it bluntly, it is slow, of course, this is also the way many manufacturers play, such as Euler good cat, it is marked with a speed of 0-50km/h for 3.8 seconds. I would like to say that since you like to play word games so much, it is good to put 0-10km/h directly, and you may not need to talk for a second. Oh, put a data, Tesla Model 3 Performance performance version of the 0-100km/h acceleration time is only 3.3 seconds, extreme Kr 001 zero hundred acceleration of 3.8 seconds, due to the slow rear section of the electric car, so if these two run 0-50km/h, 1.5 seconds are basically "No Problem".
Part7: Performance crushes all fuel vehicles?
When you talk about performance, what are you talking about? Acceleration is indeed the strength of the motor, there is no doubt about it. But if you talk about comprehensive mechanical properties, such as handling, do you dare to say that it is better than fuel supercar? Not to mention the supercar, let's take a step back, on the F30's 3 Series, Giulia, 86/brz and other models, do you dare to say the word "crush"? As for more than a lot of electric vehicles, your price has already exceeded many electric vehicles, well, no more, good meaning? Don't you still want to compare the price-performance ratio with the Wuling Hongguang MINI EV?
Written at the end: After reading the above points, I believe that everyone has been speechless. The explanation I can think of for this is that Huawei's public relations team is so bad that it can come up with these brainless words. Otherwise, Huawei is either stupid or bad.