This article is original, please do not copy and move, violators will be investigated
The famous scholar Sima Nan raised a series of questions and questions about Lenovo, making Lenovo once again the focus of the public. But unlike Sima Nan's continued vocalizations, Lenovo is very low-key and silent, and has nothing but a response to the loss of state-owned assets.
But obviously, Sima Nan did not recognize Lenovo's response and increased his firepower again, what kind of voice did Sima Nan say this time? How should the Lenovo event end?
Sima Nan spoke out again about the Lenovo incident
For lenovo, presumably the Chinese people are familiar with it, but whenever lenovo is mentioned, they will always have various emotions, and there is a feeling of hating iron and steel.
Ming Lenovo has a good foundation, backed by the Chinese Academy of Sciences, and many deep technical backgrounds. However, in the past few decades of development, Lenovo has not met the expectations of the Chinese people, but has had one confusing event after another.
Why are the prices of Lenovo's computer products at home and abroad different, and why can the board of directors share most of the company's net profit? Why did not pay attention to the research and development of core technologies, but embarked on the route of "assembly plant".
In addition, Sima Nan also raised his own doubts, including the loss of Lenovo's state-owned assets, half of the board executives are foreigners, and even expressed his opinion on Liu Chuanzhi's retirement pension of 100 million.
When all kinds of questions come together, the outside world hopes that Lenovo can give answers. Finally, Lenovo responded by taking a stand on the loss of state-owned assets, saying that in 2009, in accordance with the relevant regulations on the transaction of state-owned assets of enterprises, the Chinese Academy of Sciences conducted a strict audit, asset evaluation and filing for the transfer of 29% of Lenovo's shares.
The implication is that the transfer of 29% of the shares of lenovo by the Chinese Academy of Sciences is carried out through normal procedures, and there is no violation of the law, so there is no loss of state-owned assets.
Whether Lenovo's explanation is in line with the expectations of the public is unknown, but it has not been approved by Sima Nan.
Sima Nan increased his firepower and spoke out again in response to Lenovo's response to the loss of state-owned assets, according to Sima Nan, this matter cannot be so much. Represented by more ordinary people, these people are all question mark factions.
The implication is that even if Lenovo released the problem of the loss of state-owned assets, it is impossible for the Lenovo incident to be solved, because most ordinary people still have doubts about many problems.
As mentioned earlier, Lenovo founder Liu Chuanzhi is still holding a pension of 100 million yuan after retirement, and whether Lenovo is innocent in the end. These need to be marked with a question mark, and Lenovo does not give answers to these questions.
It is estimated that Lenovo will not explain these problems for a while and a half, because no matter how it is explained, there will always be new questions that will be asked. Other issues will not be discussed for the time being, and on the loss of state-owned assets, in addition to Sima Nan's belief that it cannot be eliminated, the SASAC has also spoken out. It said that it would strengthen supervision in key areas and build a dam to prevent the loss of state-owned assets.
Although the names of certain companies are not mentioned, there may be a deeper meaning at this point in time.
How should the Lenovo event end?
Once upon a time, Lenovo was also a proud enterprise for countless Chinese people, in the era when foreign PCs occupied the domestic market, Lenovo broke the situation and continued to sell Lenovo computers to the world. To this day, lenovo's name has always existed among the world's top computer brands.
No matter how you look at it, Lenovo should become a pride, a role model, but in the hearts of the people, it is difficult to use Lenovo as a pride and example.
Perhaps there is an over-exaggerated component of the outside world, or perhaps some people deliberately do it, but how to explain the inconsistency of computer prices at home and abroad, how to respond to Liu Chuanzhi's retirement pension of 100 million.
In other words, if Lenovo can achieve scientific research achievements that attract the world's attention, even if there are these circumstances, I believe that the Chinese people will also cheer for Lenovo.
But in fact, Lenovo's R & D investment has not met the expectations of the public's minds, core technology, parts and components basically rely on procurement. If Lenovo could occupy a place in the core technology field, it would not be such a situation. You don't even need any response, you can speak with technical strength.
At this point, how should the Lenovo incident end? I am afraid that this depends on the attitude of association, if you can pay attention to the problems raised by the outside world and give corresponding statements, you may be able to dispel the doubts of the outside world. Or Lenovo will come up with more scientific research results, shine on the world stage, and show the core technology to the world, and it can also be recognized by the public.
Now lenovo, apart from remaining silent, has nothing else. An explanation of the loss of state-owned assets is still published on the intranet, is this for Lenovo people to know, or is it an attempt to make the truth public?
This makes one think that silence is the best explanation, and the more so, the more questioning the outside world will be. If Lenovo wants all events to end as soon as possible, it should show its attitude.
summary
Sima Nan's view of the Lenovo incident is very clear, and I believe that this is also where many people are curious. Whether the Lenovo incident is innocent or true should have been explained by Lenovo's comprehensive response, but a response only to the loss of state-owned assets cannot solve all the problems.
In the words of Sima Nan, it is impossible for lenovo to end the incident, and we expect Lenovo to give the final answer that the outside world wants.
What do you think about Lenovo? Feel free to leave a message below to share.
Technology is fun and takes you to know new things about technology