Anyone who has had experience sending their children to school knows
Sooner or later, the most congested thing is the school entrance
It is not an exaggeration to say that it is difficult to walk
To solve this problem
Zhengzhou recently introduced a plan
The scheme stipulates:
Parents violate traffic laws
Children are not eligible for the outstanding selection
Source: Henan Provincial People's Government Website
Recently, Zhengzhou held a video conference on the mobilization and deployment of the city's student safety travel comprehensive management action, at which the "Zhengzhou City Student Safety Travel Comprehensive Management Work Plan" was announced, the plan emphasized that the public security traffic police department will cooperate with the municipal education department and the municipal civilization office to transfer student vehicles and personnel traffic violations into the school to create a civilized unit, a civilized class, and a three-good student assessment and evaluation scope.
The solution is out
Netizens are talking hotly
Square: If you control the child, you control the parent
Support is endless on the Internet, and even some netizens have proposed that this provision should be played on a loop at various intersections, after all, the child's business is a major event that we Chinese, affecting the child's "future" behavior, most people will be leisurely, extra cautious. Traffic violations at the entrance of the school are repeatedly prohibited, and it is an effective way to manage parents by managing children. Moreover, parents now basically love their children, and when they hear that their traffic violations may affect their children's evaluation, it is more effective than deducting points and fines for their driver's licenses.
Counter: Why should the child bear the fault of the parent?
But at the same time, some people have raised objections: isn't this just "sitting together"? It violates the principle of fairness and the rule of law. Parents' fault, why let the child take responsibility? This, even if effective, is highly inappropriate and contrary to the principle of fairness.
Some netizens even proposed: According to this logic, if the child is evaluated in school, is it necessary for the unit to increase the salary of the parents?
There are also netizens jokingly called ↓↓↓
There have been many similar "sit-in law enforcement" mentalities in recent years
In 2018, Shandong Heze City launched a special rectification action for electric vehicles, and some schools linked parents driving electric vehicles that exceeded the standard with students' "moral character points" when cooperating with government department actions; in 2016, Hangzhou also had reports that parents parked inside the yellow line of the off-campus motorway, deducted class collective points, and affected the evaluation of three good students.
Is such a move appropriate?
Imagine if a student is disqualified from the Three Good Students' Assessment because of a parental traffic violation, which is bound to be publicly explained, and will it cause harm to the child's self-esteem? Why should parents bear the mistakes they make?
Whether a child is good or not as a student and how good it is still depends on the student's own daily performance. If parents can also "participate" in, then the final evaluation may not be the three good students, but the "three good families".
Guangming Network published a comment saying:
One of the great essences of a society governed by the rule of law is that who bears the responsibility of whoever bears it, and whoever exercises the law enforcement power cannot go beyond the border and cross the line. Specific to this matter, the reason is very simple: the traffic police department does not have the power to enforce the law in the field of education, and the school does not have the power to manage traffic violations.
What do you think about that?
Welcome to leave a message to share!
Comprehensive: talk box, Guangming Network, Guangming Daily, netizen comments, etc
Source: Newsroom