Depth: Sima Nan and Zhang Jie commented on the association and raised questions about the thick black operation of foreign capital harvesting Chinese enterprises

Text/Yang Chen

After Sima Nan shelled Lenovo, Professor Zhang Jie's video commenting on the Lenovo incident caught fire again, revealing a big problem behind the loss of Lenovo's state-owned assets, that is, at that time, state-owned enterprises and cadres and workers were short of money, so many such state-owned enterprises at that time were thrown out of the burden to various capitalists at home and abroad. Looking back at the beginning, in the decades before the reform and opening up, China's price and income level was very stable, and soon after the opening up, the ratio of the renminbi to the dollar fell from one to one to three points, and then this ratio fell all the way down to one to eight points, and the black market reached one to ten. In addition to empty mouths and white teeth, the Americans and Westerners who control the right to speak about world finance have not given Chinese a reasonable explanation.

According to this currency comparison that is in line with international standards and pegged to the US dollar, China's domestic assets, output value, and people's income have been greatly reduced. The domestic assets, output value, and employee incomes and prices that have been stable for decades after the founding of the People's Republic of China have suddenly decreased several times in the new comparison with the dollar, and the living standards of state-owned enterprises and state-owned enterprise workers at that time naturally fell into difficulties. Under these circumstances, capitals in the United States, West, Japan and other countries have acquired state-owned assets in the name of investment and have sought out domestic compradors they admire to act as their agents. However, at that time, Chinese were not familiar with these routines of foreigners and compradors, and this routine always liked to play the edge of relevant policies, or simply illegally operated to convert public assets from public to private. Such a riotous operation, at that time, was often crowned with the aura of openness or "restructuring", which was very regrettable. Now, I am afraid, it is time to sort out and liquidate these problems, is it reasonable for them to take away the equity of state-owned enterprises and distribute benefits today? In the specific environment, the equity transfer operation of state-owned enterprises has caused today's problems, and the controversy caused by it is also very large, so do we have to talk about it and take a countermeasure and really solve it? Sima Nan's comment on the associated incident is enough for us to see the universal voice of people of insight and the broad masses of the people in our country.

To sum up, we should now seriously consider that in the early stage of opening up, foreign countries used the advantages of asymmetric economy to short and smaller to a certain extent, and then foreign capital and compradors bought China's assets on a large scale, which is a very unfair market operation problem, and it is necessary to adjust, correct and rebalance the situation formed by this problem in the new period.

Many countries, collectives and other benign assets and equity in China have become enterprises with foreign backgrounds or domestic capitalists through a series of routines. Whether it is domestic or international capitalists, often have a common characteristic, that is, the pursuit of technological progress and innovation, far less industrialists focus, let alone state-owned assets and national enterprises for China's economy, industry, people's livelihood angry feelings. Through years of observing the context of american and Western Japanese capital and domestic compradors: first it is a carnival of seizing wealth; then it is necessary to harvest the benign assets of a country and the blood and sweat of the people; then, their ambitions will be further expanded, and the enterprises driven by or controlled by international capital will eventually come to the opposite side of China and the Chinese people, and enter the "toolbox" of the capital hegemony to encircle China. In the past few years of fierce confrontation between China and the United States, the capital and enterprises controlled by the United States and the West naturally have to serve and do things for the main son, and it is difficult to stand on the side of China, so there is a certain thing that wants to stab China's high-tech enterprise Huawei on 5G. We must beware of such enterprises becoming risk factors that will be used by foreign anti-China forces to undermine China's economic and social security, stability, and development process.

After years of development, most of the enterprises that have been acquired and driven by foreign capital and their compradors have made no achievements in technological innovation, but they have spawned a large number of monopoly market applications. These monopoly capital may turn their hands into clouds and rain in China's market at any time, resulting in risks in China's market economy and difficulty in protecting the interests of consumers, fortunately, the state has struck quickly, and in recent years, many timely and effective measures have been taken to ensure market stability and safeguard the interests of consumers in anti-monopoly. Overseas anti-China forces have not yet been able to stir up trouble at home through foreign monopoly capital and its compradors.

Of course, here we do not do association is to be controlled by foreign capital or the discussion of comprador enterprises. Rather, I would like to say that the experience of decades of opening up tells us that almost no enterprise controlled by the capital of the United States, The West and Japan has formed the competitiveness of the core of China's industry, and such enterprises are not enterprising and lackluster in technological innovation, let alone achieve common prosperity, but they are very aggressive in monopolizing and harvesting the domestic market. A large number of benign social material human resources are extremely unreasonable to serve the capitalists of these enterprises and foreign countries to make a lot of money, and the reality and policies regarding the tilt of resources to foreign capital and comprador enterprises should be thoroughly adjusted. What is even more ironic is that while China is grabbing a lot of wealth but does not think about returns, they also make a "Xinjiang cotton" at every turn, "do not recall" or insult China after harming Chinese consumers, and what is the thing that interferes in China's internal affairs and Chinese such as stabbing a knife in the back of Chinese enterprises and subsidizing the foreign market, even if such enterprises are swept out of the house or thunderstorm, it is not only harmless to China's economy, but also has the benefit of purifying the industry and market space.

Looking back at the more than 40 years, enterprises that have rapidly promoted China's high-quality development, technological revitalization and a large number of social returns are almost not state-owned enterprises or national and private enterprises that focus on industrial industry and technological progress. China is now in fact the world's largest country in manufacturing, industry and trade, and is also an emerging country with a rapid rise in the field of high technology, and some of its technological levels rank among the best in the world. Everybody knows it.