Professor Zhang:
Hello!
Originally, you couldn't have crossed paths with me! Whether it is knowledge or title, you are tall and glamorous. If you use seafood to describe it, you are a fat crab, and I, if I want to make a skinny little shrimp, I am afraid that I have to work hard to suckle.
Before, I didn't know about you, but now, not only do I know, just now, I was very fortunate, of course, unfortunately, to read a few of your Microblogs, two, to be precise.
Don't tell you that I know you from Fang Fang's diary. Fang Fang excerpted a few passages of your writing in her diary, and I was so surprised to read it, because I couldn't believe that such a fake and suspected fabrication of the text would come from the handwriting of a Professor of Peking University, and if you really were a professor and doctoral supervisor of Peking University, I really wanted to cry.
I cry for Mr. Cai Yuanpei!
When did I have someone like you as a professor? I can't believe it! I really dare not!
With my eyes wide open, I read Fang Fang's excerpt back and forth several times, and finally found a glimmer of life for you, because Fang Fang said in the text that the excerpt was forwarded to her by others, and she herself did not actually look at your original text, which made my heart hanging high because of you finally have some peace. Ah, if so, the problem is most likely with the forwarder, who may have deliberately tampered with your text out of blind adoration or superstition or other motives that I can't guess.
This, of course, is highly likely.
Needless to say, I was immediately in a hurry and rushed to your Weibo. After all, it's not good to wrong people! It's really bad, whether square or round, you shouldn't do it.
The first thing you see is your Weibo with the word "true" written on it. This article is about a thousand words, the "true" word actually appeared 27 times, and the "true" word is related to the word "true", probably "sincerity, true, true feelings, sincerity", etc., to say, are beautiful words, but the whole article read down, I am a little bored, when, our rich and beautiful Chinese characters, to become so pale and scarce, and, in the hands of a Peking University professor and doctoral supervisor.
To tell you the truth, Professor Zhang, you use too many "true" words, and the words you use make people feel that your words are really a bit twisted and a little fake.
You are a professor, a doctoral supervisor, I know, I can almost be sure, don't say the books you have read, I am afraid that only the names of the books you have read, add up to the same as the Chinese characters I know, but what I want to say is that, in fact, even the children in the countryside know that if you really want to express the truth, I am afraid that this is not the way. For example, suppose you fall in love with a girl, I think you will always fall in love with a girl, because this is the common sense of human beings. Then, you should not just put love on your lips every day, but you are not willing to pluck a single hair. To be more specific, love should be expressed in action rather than in words. Speaking of truth, specific to the truth in the article, still. You should use facts to show us your truth, not over and over again, just by mouth or with the word "true.".
But anyway, the Weibo article I read with the word "true" was not the one that Fang Fang copied in his diary, and after reading it at first, I even thought that Fang Fang's excerpt was indeed tampered with by some stupid eggs. Then, it was my cooking time, because I had to cook, I paused reading your Weibo, and after the Zhang Luo family finished eating, unfortunately, I saw the screenshots sent by others on the Internet, read it word by word, and knew that Fang Fang's excerpt was really true. But I still didn't believe it, afraid that someone had ulterior motives and deliberately framed you, so in the end, I still did it properly, went to your Weibo again, and then, unfortunately, found the origin of the excerpt in Fang Fang's diary.
How to say it, Professor Zhang, this time, I am simply disappointed in you.
You said that you are a professor, a doctoral supervisor, and still from Peking University, how can you speak so irresponsibly and speak so freely? The number of fans of your Weibo, I counted for a long time, day, more than nine million. You say you have so many fans, how can you talk, open your mouth, so willful? A few days ago, someone asked me if I hate Trump, to be honest, because I am really far away from Special, so this question has never been thought of, and now I want to say that I don't like this, and the important reason why I don't like it is because of this. For example, the Chinese virus, where is the answer given to him by science? If there is no scientific provenance, this is nonsense. The result of this nonsense is that too many Chinese and Chinese have brought harm and distress.
I talked to a friend who works in the United States on this matter, and I asked him whether the Chinese had protested, and he said that the current situation of the spread of the virus is grim, there is no march on the streets, and there are many criticisms of Trump in words. After listening to it, I was a little relieved, after all, the common people are not all stupid worms.
Looking back at your text that was excerpted by Fang Fang, Professor Zhang, Professor Zhang, to tell the truth, your text is really laughable and generous. Even I, who am not generous, can't help but laugh at you because of this text of yours. For the sake of clarity, I'll simply move your article over:
3-20 13:23
There is a writer who specializes in writing epidemic diaries, and now he is criticizing and questioning these writers everywhere, saying how shady they are, implying that they are being instructed, how an anonymous high school student is foolishly struggling in the abyss of life, and so on. Frankly speaking, the reason why people distrust her writing is because in the diary during the severe epidemic period, the photo of the mobile phone in the funeral home was thrown in documentary text, which is said to have been sent to her by a doctor friend. This has attracted widespread attention and dissemination, and it is also the most remarkable thing about the diary.
Everyone was questioning this matter, asking if there was this photo, but they did not dare to face it at all, pushing three or four, saying everywhere that someone wanted to persecute her. But in fact, the most important thing is that the writer should have the most basic heart of truth-seeking, can not lose the bottom line of being a person, can not use fabrication to deceive the readers who naively believe in her, and at such a critical moment, the fabrication of such a key thing is absolutely intolerable, there is no conscience, and it is the eternal shame of a writer's life.
Diaries should not be made up, not used to stir up readers' emotions and tease them. The question is not what the point of view is, but whether a writer can fool the reader without being questioned. When questioning and criticizing others for lying, you should not lie yourself. Those who lie are of course subject to social reflection and questioning, but we ourselves also need to have a minimum moral bottom line. Don't people think they have a higher bottom line, don't they think you want to be more sincere than what you criticize? Wuhan does have a lot of real misfortunes, and in the face of the pandemic, there are indeed a lot of real sufferings that people remember. They are powerful enough. Why make something up?
Take out the evidence, don't use such prevarication as protecting the source, things have caused a sensation around the world, and have caused a great response, in black and white, clearly written. If it is true, the doctor who delivers the message is the hero who speaks the truth honestly, the one who tells the truth in times of social difficulties, the person who tells the truth to society most sincerely, we will all salute him, and all of us will resolutely defend him. If credible evidence is published, we are all willing to apologize most sincerely to the writer, and we are willing to accept any criticism and punishment. But if there is no evidence, it is made up, the writer should admit frankly to society, and obtain the understanding and forgiveness of those readers who sincerely believe in her, after all, it is also a lot of effort, and it is not easy. I believe that the reader may understand, and may also save some other text that may have real feelings.
In fact, if it is not true, she needs to be sorry, not the readers who question her, they have not been hurt, because they have gained a minimum dignity because of the doubt, because they have not believed and have gained a sense of truth-seeking dignity of the reader. It is most important to apologize to those who believe, those who are teased, despised, and seen as stupid and deceitful fools to tease their integrity. This is the author's loss of virtue and the loss of conscience. In such a situation, to avoid this crucial fact is the author's blasphemy against the reader, a mockery of conscience. Willing to appeal to the author's conscience, to present evidence that the diary has attracted great attention, to give the doctor friend who exists and himself to obtain a value, or to seek the reader's forgiveness for the fact that it does not exist.
Willing to appeal to the conscience of man. In such a crisis, please be a person with a conscience and speak the truth.
In this article, Professor Zhang actually said "true" and "sincere, true" many times, etc., but according to my visual assessment, it should not exceed the one I mentioned earlier. I have not dealt with Professor Zhang, I don't know how true I really am, in terms of the frequency of use of the word "true" in these two texts, it is completely possible to change the surname "true".
Next, I will talk to Professor "True" about the falsehood above.
First of all, the opening paragraph does not use Fang Fang but uses "there is a writer who specializes in writing epidemic diaries", which is false, of course, if the real professor really does not know that the writer who writes the epidemic diary is named Fang Fang, then let's say another ah.
Secondly, "there is now a lot of criticism everywhere about the people who question these writers, about how shady they are, about how they are being directed, how an anonymous high school student is foolishly struggling in the abyss of life, and so on." Professor Zhen wrote these sentences before the "honesty" of the first natural paragraph of the text. I would like to say that Fang Fang's diary, I have been reading, about the paragraph she wrote to the "high school student", I am really touched from the bottom of my heart, my eyes tell me, she did not accuse the high school student of how ignorant, although, many people think that the so-called high school student, really should be quoted, but she still took out a warm heart, sincerely communicate with him (her), do not feel that this is killing chickens with a cattle knife.
Furthermore, let's take a look at your "candor" and "why people distrust her writing is because of the photograph of the funeral home mobile phone thrown in the diary during the severe epidemic period, which is said to have been sent to her by a doctor friend." "Reading this honesty of yours, my first reaction is, Light fire, I even thought that you had never read Fang Fang's diary. But read it again, and my light becomes a chill in my back, because there is also a possibility that you actually read Fang Fang's diary, and you know that there are no photos in the diary, which can be seen from the perseverance of the "pursuit" of photos in your later text. If so, your thick and dark mind to play with words, your insincerity and lack of directness, is simply chilling. Fang Fang's writing is obviously much more frank and straightforward than yours, although she does not put the "true" on her lips in the form of words.
Looking back, let's continue to talk about your article, you said that people do not trust each other's words, which people are referring to? Of course, I also firmly believe that such people must exist, such as yourself. If, you write this directly in your text, I, Zhang Yiwu, the reason why I do not trust the writer Fang Fang's writing is based on the following points... In this case, I must have a lot more respect for you than I have now. Do things yourself, why take people to plant stolen goods? Of course, when I say planting stolen goods, you are sure to be angry, and you will definitely say that such people do exist? If you are grumpy, you will even slap the table and scold the mother, calling me a blind man.
I don't know how Professor Zhang's vision is? I'm sorry, I'm really short-sighted old flower plus astigmatism, and my vision is really poor. But despite this, I still know that if you don't say half a sentence, you can't just look at the problem, you said that Fang Fang's diary some people don't trust, yes! But why don't you say, you really can't figure it out, Fang Fang's diary, how can there be so many people who believe?
Professor Zhang, as a person who opens his mouth and keeps his mouth shut from the "truth", can't you write a few words that are not so one-sided and more real from your heart? Since you want to say it, you must dare to be bold, why use people as your shield?
Professor Zhang, after reading the first paragraph of your article, I was just a little angry, after reading the whole text, I was surprised, you play with the high magic of the text and the darkness of the heart, in terms of height, it is really the pinnacle of ah. Could it be that the professor of Tangtang Peking University can waste Chinese characters so openly and honestly?
Professor Zhang, you are really, a little fake.
Fang Fang said in his diary that you are a big name, how to dafa? I don't understand. Curiosity is there, even if it kills the cat, it can't be extinguished. So needless to say, I went to Baidu, checked your "business card", and saw that in your label, there are not only professors and cultural scholars, but also a title of "famous critic".
Professor Zhang, you put the real word on your lips, and I have always loved people who like the real thing, so now, I have a question for you, as a famous critic, do you often comment on other people's works? Before each review, did you carefully read the original text?
Your interpretation of the other party's diary made me see two possibilities for you: First, without reading the original text, just by relying on a few words of hearsay, coupled with your wisdom, you can concoct an article that has been praised by many people, and then mix into a so-called famous critic. When you review Fang Fang's diary, it is actually just a repetition of the old way, or you just concoct your usual practice.
If so, I cry for the academic community!
After crying, I would like to ask, as a professor and a doctoral scholar of culture, do you not feel at all that you have become impetuous to the bone? You have such an attitude of learning and literature, how do you deserve to stand in Peking University?
Of course, there is another possibility, that is, as a Peking University person, your IQ is completely online, and Fang Fang's diary is completely read, but you just want to deliberately play word games, so that most of us who are simple-minded think that we have caught your handle, but in fact, we have fallen into a trap that you have carefully set. This trap, of course, is by no means your inadvertent work.
When most of us are angry at the first paragraph of your text and are busy clarifying that there are no mobile phone photos in the text, are you working with the people you are talking about in your text to secretly rejoice behind closed doors?
If so, I cry for the darkness of man!
You claim to be true, but where is your so-called truth manifested? You insulted the Chinese characters so insidiously, won't your conscience hurt?
You won't, I will. I will even cry for our sad Chinese characters because of this!
You say that if Fang Fang's diary is false, it is the writer's "eternal shame for a lifetime", and you, an upright Peking University professor, this kind of playing with words is not also your "eternal shame for a lifetime"?
I'm ashamed of you!
Lu Xun has scolded many people in his life, but I still love him. Because, he scolds very sharply but also very frankly and very gentlemanly, and you, as for you, are completely a villain.
As a professor of the teacher, a doctoral supervisor of Peking University, you have fallen to the point that you can't speak well, but you can still hang the word "true" on your lips without guilt, except for crying bitterly, I really don't want to say anything more.
Sincerely
salute
Comfort
March 22, 2020
![Zhang Yiwu: Why the Western media "bypassed" Universal Studios Beijing[fig]]()