laitimes

Zhengzhou men bought more than 4,000 yuan of brine eggs online and found that the additives had a different loss of 47840 yuan

author:Bright Net

Henan Legal Daily

Zhengzhou men bought more than 4,000 yuan of brine eggs online and found that the additives had a different loss of 47840 yuan

Zhengzhou men bought more than 130 copies of a brand of brine eggs online, with a total price of 4784 yuan. After receiving the goods, it was found that the ingredient list of the brine egg showed that it contained additives that should not be used in the brine egg, so the manufacturer of the brine egg sued the court and was awarded ten times the compensation.

A small brine egg is only two dollars, but Mr. Bai in Zhengzhou is more real, and actively defends his rights, and finally...

Because of the brine egg lost 47840 yuan, let's take a look at what is going on?

The problem is with the ingredients for the brine egg

On March 2, 2018, Mr. Bai of Zhengzhou purchased more than 130 copies of a brand of brine eggs on an online platform, a total of 16 boxes, with a total price of 4784 yuan, and wanted to give them as gifts to his relatives and friends.

After Mr. Bai received the goods, when looking through the packaging of the brine egg, he found that the ingredient list of the brine egg showed that it contained the additives sodium tripolyphosphate and red yeast red that should not be used in the brine egg, so he sued the production company of the brine egg to the Zhengzhou Jinshui District Court, requesting the defendant to return the purchase price of 4784 yuan and pay ten times the compensation of 47840 yuan in accordance with the law.

Ten times the compensation

The Jinshui District Court of Zhengzhou City held a hearing on the case, and the plaintiff and the defendant had no objection to the fact that the products involved in the case could not use the food additives red yeast red and sodium tripolyphosphate.

Article 15 of China's Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Food and Drug Dispute Cases stipulates that where a consumer produces food that does not meet safety standards or sells food that knows that it does not meet food safety standards, and consumers claim to pay ten times the price of compensation to the producer or seller, or claim compensation in accordance with other compensation standards prescribed by law, the people's court shall support it.

In accordance with the provisions of the law, the Jinshui District Court upheld Mr. Bai's claim and ordered the defendant to return the plaintiff's shopping money of 4,784 yuan and compensate the plaintiff for 47,840 yuan.

The defendant appealed against the first-instance judgment. The Zhengzhou Intermediate People's Court upheld the original judgment in the second instance.

(Original title: Only because of this small detail, Zhengzhou men online shopping brine eggs were compensated 47840 yuan)

Copyright Notice: If copyright issues are involved, please contact the website with proof of ownership

Read on