Before the end of May this year, HBO's historical film "Oslo" can be regarded as a masterpiece.
Of course, to watch this film, we must have a certain understanding of the situation in the Middle East.
The film focuses on the Oslo Accords, the first peace agreement between Palestine and Israel.
Unfortunately, after the agreement was signed in the presence of US President Clinton, Israeli extremists assassinated Prime Minister Abbey Rabin, and the Palestinian-Israeli conflict resumed.
If the two sides really have a day of reconciliation, the Oslo Accords could be the historical cornerstone of the Palestinian-Israeli peace talks.
That's where she's worth.
In 2017, the drama "Oslo" set in this historical theme was released.
She began a few years ago by the playwright J.T. Rogers. T. Rogers, introduced by director Bartlett Sher, met Norwegian diplomat Terje Rød-Larsen, who told him interesting anecdotes about his involvement with Mona Juul, the wife of Norway's ambassador to the United Nations, in oslo peace talks.
The story structure of "Oslo" is basically faithful to historical facts, "everything in the play is real, but what the characters say is mine", not only that, the author condenses the 14 secret negotiations between the Palestinian and Israeli sides that lasted for several months in the play into a three-hour talk and dinner.
His wife, Mona, became a diplomat, apparently to satisfy the plot needs of her mediation between the representatives of the two countries, while the husband's becoming a social scientist who understands people's psychology and is good at resolving conflicts is equally meaningful.
The play was adapted into a movie by HBO and officially released on May 28.
I was lucky enough to watch this film for the first time.
It can be said that this film is very suitable for the scene. If it had been released during the recent Palestinian-Israeli armed conflict, it would have had a better box office value.
To understand the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, this film may be a means for most people to make up for history. On the Middle East issue, because of the lack of information, our understanding is very one-sided.
The contacts between The Palestinians and Israelis are very difficult, and it is difficult for the two sides to sign a peace agreement.
In the film Oslo, the Palestinian and Israeli sides are brought to the negotiating table by a Norwegian diplomat, Mona (as mentioned earlier, a role swap was made to make the narrative more attractive).
The reason why Mona risked colluding with foreign countries to go to prison and help her husband facilitate negotiations between the two sides was because after going to the Middle East, she experienced the death of her colleagues due to war, especially after seeing that the two palestinian-Israeli youths who confronted each other finally gave up mutual harm, and decided to try to promote peace talks between the two sides.
There is nothing more valuable to a diplomat.
The truth about the motives of the Oslo peace talks is certainly not so humane, but the result of rationalization.
But for the sake of the plot, we still welcome this adaptation, after all, the film is the best way to promote sexual goodness.
Any opposing political organization will often have a social channel after the channels of official communication are blocked.
The film reveals some of the truths behind the workings of society.
Think tanks are often such a role.
In the film, Mona's husband is a sociologist at the Farford think tank, and the peace talks are hosted by him to invite both parties to Norway.
Think tanks in reality are either variants of the socialization of power institutions.
The first is to look for a united front of authority. Ancient and modern, Chinese and foreign, without exception.
In the course of negotiations, the two sides of the rupture must find the common denominator,
Food and beauty are the best props.
The muffins of the eldest sister in charge of the peace talks at Oslo eased the tension in the first round of talks between the two sides.
As a diplomat Mona, he and her husband have always been treated equally by both parties as platform parties with the mentality of not interfering with a third party at the beginning.
However, the main force of negotiations on both sides slowly became dependent on Mona.
In the second round of talks, Israel's specifications were upgraded. Foreign Minister Director-General Xavier replaced the representatives of the first round of contacts, two professors from Haifa: Yarkhshfield and Ron pendeck.
At first, Savile believed that the other side's representative, PLO Finance Minister Ahmakuri, was a trustworthy and negotiable object.
As a diplomat, he could not be ecstatic, but invited the Mona couple to the garage, checked that there were no wiretaps in the garage, turned on the music and secretly told Mona his psychological words in a Man dance.
In addition to food and beauty, it is family affection.
Tarry, as a sociologist, took the initiative to approach Israel, believing that their official rigid dialogue was ineffective and needed to open a second call, a private channel.
Tarry's basis is that man is human, even on both sides of the enemy.
In fact, neither negotiator had dreamed that their daughter would be named Maya.
If the details of history are really like this, it would be too coincidental.
Maybe it's a screenwriter's adaptation.
It doesn't matter, what matters is that the peace talks are still ongoing.
In the third round of talks, Israel added a new legal adviser Joel.
Negotiations began at an impasse, but with the approval of the Israeli Director-General and the most sensitive issue of Jerusalem, the two sides conceded.
When it was about to be cut in two, Murray, who had always remained neutral and did not intervene, touched both sides with a word.
50 years, the two sides have been entangled for so long, seeing that the peace talks are about to be reached, if this trip is scattered in one shot and two, I don't know when we can walk together again, and the disaster continues . ~ ~ ~ ~
As soon as this remark came out, the two sides once again came to the negotiating table.
Dramatically, the final confirmation of the clause took place in the residence of the Swedish royal family.
Because things are so special, the royal family has no care at all for peace talks and for helping peace talks.
Meals are not prepared
The printer is broken and no one is going to fix it
Photographic equipment for recording historic moments is not provided
If, if that were the case, then the statement of facts would really be decided by the diplomat Tarry.
The confirmation of the final agreement proceeded in this way.
Israeli diplomat Perez was at the scene.
Palestine Liberation Organization diplomat Abu al-Ala (Ahmakuri) did not come to the scene, they were in Tunisia.
The two sides confirmed the agreement one by one by telephone in the presence of Taree.
On the other end of the phone, Arafat, a brother of the PLO, was also there.
The agreement was reached, and a strange voice came from the other side of the phone.
The sound of joy and tears.
If the details of history are true as the film states, on the one hand, the metaphorical agreement is very fragile, and it will be broken at one blow.
In fact, two years later, Israeli Prime Minister Rabin, who had promoted the peace process, was assassinated.
Scenes like Oslo's are not uncommon in history.
She is almost a historical copy of Sino-US relations.
After Chiang Kai-shek defeated Taiwan, a new government was established on the mainland. The United States did not establish diplomatic relations with the new government, and relations were tense, and even so, officials held secret talks after the Geneva Conference in 1954.
Between 1955 and 1970, China and the United States held 136 ambassadorial-level talks, which enabled the two countries that had not yet established diplomatic relations to have channels for contact and dialogue, and to a certain extent eased or even defused the antagonism between the two sides. In the 15 years of talks, the ambassadors of the two countries have had a certain impact on Sino-US relations and changes in the foreign policies of the two countries through many confrontations and games, laying the foundation for opening the door of China and the United States and formally establishing diplomatic relations.
The place of the Palestinian-Israeli peace talks was in Oslo.
Poland, the site of the U.S.-China secret talks.
So the role of the Polish ambassador is very important.
Wang Bingnan talked with the U.S. ambassador for nine years, holding 120 talks, and was transferred back to China in April 1964 as vice minister of foreign affairs. The new Chinese ambassador to Poland, Wang Guoquan, took up his post and became the Chinese representative of the Sino-US ambassadorial talks.
Unfortunately, such a good historical theme cannot appear in film works.
Some of the details in "Oslo" may give us a glimpse of some details of the history of China and the United States.
From this point of view, "Oslo" is worth watching for Chinese film fans.
It is not an exaggeration to say that she is a king of bombing.