I'm a zebra, hello!
Dear righteous friends who are concerned about the 28-year incident of the wrong change of life, July 8 will finally usher in the final trial of the second trial
However, before the results of the wrong change of life cases have arrived, netizens have begun to judge, the views of lawyers who have always been related to the wrong change of life events, in the face of the wrong change of life for 28 years, the views of the majority of netizens are mostly the same

But why do lawyers' judgments vary widely? What is the reason for this? Netizens all think that the wrong change of life for 28 years, the facts are clear, and there are many doubts. Too many netizens in order to explore the truth, tea does not think about food do not want to. But as professional lawyers, the judgment they give is surprisingly different, leaving us netizens confused
Let's take a look at the statements of the lawyers involved in the wrong change of life case, to see if their statements are conducive to the judgment of the second-instance trial of the wrong change of life case, Lawyer Deng said: Anyone with normal thinking and sound mind will not forcibly reverse the "wrong change of life" back to "stealing life", not long after this remark appeared, Du Xinzhi began to accuse Xu Min of having the motive and suspicion of stealing the child
Then lawyer Zhou said: Extremely affirmative judgment and the official's exhortation to the two families to get along with each other
Lawyer Li said: Wrong change is not artificial, it is impossible to make a wrong change, and the wrong change can be changed to a stealth change
Ms. Pan said: The case of wrongly changing lives is indeed a large number of doubts worth exploring the truth of the case, and this case still has great warning significance and educational significance for society, and it is also of great significance to the socialist core values of stressing honesty and friendship
It is rumored that Lawyer Pan has the confidence to transform this case, and the majority of netizens understand that although the lawyer is not the adjudicator of the case, their defense should be based on facts, and they should dare to point out the doubts in the case
For right and wrong, the facts will not be changed because of their remarks, will the statements of the above lawyers have an impact on the second instance of the wrong change of life? What do you think?