The previous article said:
The weakness of secularists is that they cannot resist the attacks of strong deconstructors like Leninism.
Only strong religious groups, such as Reagan or the Taliban, could resist.
Of course, few people equate American fundamentalism with Islamic fundamentalism, but from an evolutionary point of view, the situation is indeed the same.
Reagan gave the "Empire of Evil" speech at the Evangelical Confederation of America
Fundamentalism exists for the same reason that it is used to prevent the invasion of viruses in the environment, just like the antibodies to the virus in the human body.
In a world without communism, they themselves became objects of oblivion by secularists.
We can say with certainty that human nature is to be good and bad, and all people want to give less and enjoy more.
Because the basic theory of evolution does not support you in consuming resources to maintain organizations that do not make a profit.
Only the deep sea has whales, and the plateau can have yaks.
If the weather is hot, the thick fur becomes a burden to you, and you need to pay more costs, you will suffer a big loss, and you will lose the advantage of evolution.
These resources could have been converted into other survival advantages, even if you only had a 1% more advantage than others, you could clear out the other 1%.
If it's long enough, it gives you an absolute advantage.
In a world without communists, the fundamentalist orders must have been purged by secularists, who have paid a huge cost in building strong organizations.
And the Order has not been able to provide believers with more benefits than secularists and atheists.
This is equivalent to the fact that if you create an environment that allows the parasites to live perfectly, there will be more and more parasites.
The environment in which parasites exist must be full of rotten flesh, so what kind of person can eliminate parasites?
The answer is vultures.
Vultures feed on carcasses and other decomposing animals. When the rotting flesh is gone, the parasite loses its living environment.
So if there are no vultures in the world, there will be more and more corpses in the world, and more and more parasites will be there.
In this case, being a vulture is very advantageous.
If you imagine the welfare states of Europe and the United States, they are full of many weak organizations, such as animal protection, environmental protection, LGBT, BLM and so on.
If you are a puritan of fundamentalism, for the sake of political correctness, you can't kill them, and you need to pay for them and protect them, are you very bad?
But along the way through communism, weak organizations lost their parasitic environment, and political correctness suddenly ceased to exist.
Everyone depends on their own resistance to determine their survival, which constitutes a screening mechanism, and in the environment of "elimination" mechanism, fundamentalism and strong religious organizations have great superiority.
Your dedication to the organization is rewarded, communism comes, and the weak secularists are overthrown, but they cannot defeat you.
Even if you don't realize it, the actual end result is like this.
So after the end of the Cold War, there was a resurgence of strong conservative forces and strong church organizations in Eastern Europe.
It was because Eastern Europe was like after being infected by the Black Death.
Those who did not resist were screened out, and the rest were all immune people.
But if there is no erosion of the Black Death for a long time, then there will be fewer and fewer people with resistance until the Black Death comes again.
The process is endless, endless.
So we said earlier that "peace" is impossible in principle.
"Peace" itself necessarily means that an environment in which enjoyment is more conducive than devotion is created.
This environment will become more and more fragile in the face of more and more white eaters.
When a tipping point is exceeded, there will be a situation where the vandals are more favorable than the builders.
In the first decades of the Cold War, it was better to be a saboteur than a builder, and more people would be spoilers.
This created an environment for the vultures, which grew very rapidly during this time, and everyone felt that the Soviet Union had the advantage, but the vultures grew for a reason.
The environment in which vultures grow must be filled with rotting corpses, and carrion will provoke vultures.
But vultures will not grow indefinitely, because there is a reason for the appearance of vultures, and when the decaying corpses are gradually reduced, the environment in which vultures grow will no longer exist, and vultures will die in large numbers.
In the 1980s, it was the process of vulture death.
It is precisely because there is not much carrion left, and what remains is the hard bones of the Fundamentalist Order.
When it comes to hard bones, the vultures can only slowly starve to death.
As we have said before, what is the way to deal with terrorists?
Terrorists can't eradicate it, just like the Black Death, you only have to eliminate the rats, the Black Death will not break out.
If the rats are not eliminated, you are surrounded by rats and fleas, no matter how you isolate and spray poisonous water, you will still be infected.
If there were no rats and fleas, no carriers of transmission, and even if you didn't have to bother disinfecting and isolating, the Black Death itself would be gone.
The Outbreak of the Black Death, that is, because there are rats, vultures come, because there is rotten flesh, and they can't blame others.
The history of the Cold War tells us that this is actually such an evolutionary process.
Without a system of elimination mechanisms, we can assert that it must be wrong.
Originally, religion arose to provide order for society.
When the order accumulates to a certain extent, there will be out-of-production people, allowing groups that are no longer engaged in traditional production to appear.
The most representative are intellectuals.
The emergence of intellectuals is the product of the surplus of social organization resources.
For example, the primitive tribes of Africa, or the Middle Ages, when Rome had just fallen, there was no environment for intellectuals to live.
Intellectuals are unproductive and vanity-hardened, they always look down on each other, always trying to prove that I am more correct than you.
With this alone, they cannot form highly organized groups.
At the same time, they have no force and can only rely on the protection of others.
Thus the existence of intellectuals proves that society must be a highly civilized and affluent society, and that the surplus produced by society can ensure the survival of the unorganized.
But although intellectuals are not engaged in production in the traditional sense, their contribution to the amount of information is positive.
The value of the existence of intellectuals is to be able to generate a large amount of information to make up for those strong organizations that lack information.
The two form a mutually assistive relationship, like the beneficial bacteria in a person's body.
These beneficial bacteria help the body produce some of the necessary resources while protecting the body from the invasion of truly harmful bacteria.
If there are too many intellectuals, they will feel that their enjoyment is taken for granted, and then society will gradually move toward secularism, toward atheism.
That is to say, the amount of information of intellectuals destroyed the organizers who protected them, and groups such as communism were born.
The first thing communists eat is the intellectuals, who are pure consumers of high information but no organizational ability.
Looking back at the evolution of the European world order, intellectuals were originally created under the protection of the church and the nobility.
By the time of the Roman collapse of the Germanic invasion in the Middle Ages, the intellectuals of the Roman period, whether they had information productivity or not, as long as they were pure consumers and parasites in the organizational sense, were eventually swept away and eliminated.
Fallen Romans
According to Taoist thought, it is that good and evil are rewarded, and the intellectuals of the late Roman Empire are enjoying the virtues accumulated by the producers of the early order of the Roman Republic.
In the end, the production of order could not catch up with the destroyers of order, so the Roman Empire disintegrated, the Germanic barbarians, like the communists, played a role in purging, and the parasite could not survive.
The Middle Ages was a period of re-accumulation of order, without which there was no way to survive.
Thus was born the Pope, and the medieval Orders were all producers of order, on the one hand they were very religious and united, with the ability to produce organization and order.
On the other hand, they are also producers in the traditional sense, and the monks of the monasteries are all people who cultivate the land.
In the past Roman Empire, although the Roman emperor used a lot of incentives, such as whoever went to open up the land, who owned the land, who was willing to have a few more children, they could be exempt from taxation.
Even so, no one wants to have children and go farming.
These lands were reclaimed by the Christian order after the fall of Rome, and after the barbarians who invaded Rome converted to Christianity, they integrated the original tribal customary law into Christianity, converted it into feudalism, and filled the vacuum caused by the bureaucracy after the fall of Rome and re-developed.
From the dark Middle Ages to the centuries of the Enlightenment, it was the process of refilling the vacuum of order after the fall of Rome.
The feudal lords and the Catholic Church, they were both producers of order, a little bit of cumulative order.
By the time of the Enlightenment, the remnants of order began to emerge, most notably the emergence of out-of-production intellectuals.
Before that, there were no out-of-production intellectuals. Although the monks had to read the Bible, copy the scriptures, and uphold the teachings, they also had to do some labor within their power, and even had to fight against the pagans.
Although Christianity emphasized itself as a pacifist religion, it had to fight the Nordics, the Vikings, the Islamic pagans, and even the lords of different branches of the same Christian denomination.
At the same time they had to be producers, cultivating their own land, and there was no case of late Roman emperors taking out the surplus of taxes to feed them.
Everyone must take up a sickle and a hoe to feed themselves and take up arms to protect themselves.
Everyone is a producer of order, and when there is room for it, it is possible to read the Bible, to read some classical scriptures.
The same was true of the feudal noble lords, who had to take up arms and defend themselves not only, but also their vassals and people.
The early lords had little culture, only fighting power and chivalry, and only at the end of the Middle Ages, after accumulating enough accumulation, they were educated.
By the time of the Renaissance, the appearance of civilian intellectuals who were neither priests nor aristocrats was beginning to appear, indicating the end of centuries of darkness in the Middle Ages.
The end of the Middle Ages marked that the productivity of the order was sufficient to feed the pure consumer, and that no one would go hungry.
It also marks a return to the level of European order production capacity to support complex civilizations.
Complex civilization is one that allows those who are neither capable of taking up arms to protect themselves nor those who are able to take up a hoe to feed themselves to survive, and orderly consumers can be allowed to be produced
The theories that were put forward in the first 18th century were largely constructive and not too far from the Christian and feudal traditions.
It is like summarizing what really happened to European civilization, how the feudal traditions from Judea to Christ and Germany came into being.
In the past, these traditions could be practiced and not known when they were normally operating.
There is customary law, which we have done since ancient times, so how did customary law come about, and why do we do it?
If you ask a common law lawyer why we are punished this way, the lawyer will tell you that it is because the law stipulates it, and our ancestors, who cannot be traced from memory, have done so since ancient times.
You ask a preacher why we do this, and he will tell you that the Bible says this, God taught us this, the Hebrew prophets taught me, Jesus and the apostles taught us.
This is the origin of the order, which can still function very well in an era when there are no intellectuals.
It's just that no one records and summarizes, and when it comes to the Enlightenment, the first person comes out to summarize, and the original order is how it was produced.
We do not know how this order came to be, how it works, and now we summarize it to form a written, formal form.
In politics, the formal is embodied in the Constitution.
The informal aspect is embodied in a variety of philosophical theories.
After the 19th century, the Industrial Revolution began to spread, and the accumulation of order was further enriched.
Because the Industrial Revolution caused the social productive forces to rise hundreds of times, and more and more people were able to feed them, it was also at this time that intellectual groups began to diverge.
That is to say, although intellectuals are consumers of order, they are neither engaged in production nor self-preservation.
But the original intellectuals were still constructive, and their theories were still summed up in how Christian feudal society was constructed and unfolded.
The subsequent change, which was the first time in human history, should not be called human history, a similar phenomenon occurred at the end of Rome.
It should be called the first deconstructive intellectuals of Christian civilization.
Marx is one of these deconstructed intellectuals, he is not the only one, but arguably the most powerful.
The reason they arise is precisely because there is too much bread.
The main opponents of these deconstructors were the constructive intellectuals of the 18th century, that is, those who served the production of order.
People like Marx, Nietzsche, and Freud deconstructed the original basis of civilization.
What Marx tried to destroy was the basis of property rights, and what Nietzsche and Freud tried to destroy was the basis of reason.
The concept of property rights dates back to the most primitive period of the fall of Rome and the early days of the Germanic invasion.
This period was the protection of property by force, and the spoils of war were the source of property, meaning that property was privately owned.
The concept of reason, on the other hand, goes back to the combination of Catholic and ancient Greek philosophy, where the Church protects reason, demarcating the boundaries of reason through faith and determining the circumstances in which reason can function.
By the 19th century, there had been opposition to property, against self-governing bodies, against reason itself, against the boundaries of faith and reason, in favor of voluntarism, and instead of reason.
The emergence of these theories represents that carrion has accumulated to a certain extent.
In other words, there is too much carrion, and in this environment, no matter how you clean it, there is no way to avoid parasites.
In the case of this ecosystem, it's time for vultures to come out.