On October 10, the Chinese and Indian armies held the 13th round of military commander-level talks on the Chinese side of the Mordo/Chushule talks. During the talks, the Chinese side proceeded from the overall situation of safeguarding the relations between the two countries and the two armed forces, made great efforts to promote the relaxation and cooling of the border situation, and fully demonstrated its sincerity, but the Indian side still insisted on unreasonable and unrealistic demands, which added difficulties to the negotiations. China's determination and will to safeguard national sovereignty are unswerving, and I hope that the Indian side will not misjudge the situation, cherish the current hard-won situation in the China-India border area, abide by the relevant agreements and agreements and consensus between the two countries and two militaries, and earnestly show sincerity and action to work with the Chinese side to jointly safeguard peace and tranquility in the border area. However, just before the talks, on October 8, according to the Indian media", around the end of September, the Chinese and Indian armies had a brief confrontation in the eastern section of the China-India border line of actual control, but the entire report was full of false remarks, fabricating that the Chinese border guards first "crossed the line of actual control" and launched a "provocation" against the Indian side, and the Indian army not only thwarted the "invasion" of our army, but even briefly "detained" several soldiers of our army, and won the "great victory" of this "border challenge.".
Of course, in India, when the netizens called it a boiling, but just when India declared the so-called "revenge for the great revenge", the Chinese side released a set of "combination fists", the dose was extremely high, the insult was extremely great, and india was forced to dry up, and the combination fist we released was like this: First, we solemnly declared that the so-called "defeat of China's provocation" by the Indian side was purely fictitious, and the situation at that time was that our border guards were conducting normal patrols within the line of actual control and in our patrol area. Instead, it was the Indian soldiers who stuck to it like brown candy and provoked trouble. Our army did not pay any attention to the provocation of the Indian army, but only solemnly announced to the Indian army that the Indian army "has stepped into Chinese territory" and that the Indian army had no choice but to withdraw from the scene after a confrontation for a while, and no soldiers were "detained" by the Indian army.
Subsequently, a large number of photos of Indian troops being captured by our army, beaten to the point of blue nose and swollen face, and guns being captured and returned by our army appeared on the Internet. In fact, from the perspective of the surrounding terrain reflected in these photos, clear-eyed people can still see that the place of the photo incident is the western section of the Sino-Indian border, but the network public opinion does not care about the ins and outs of your photo, and in an instant, the news that "the Indian army was captured by Chinese a large number" made headlines, and the relevant photos were uploaded everywhere on Western social media, and the Indian Army, which was blown by India, became the object of ridicule by netizens in various countries. Later, the domestic network cleaned up this set of photos, but I think that this is a set of combination punches with tacit understanding, and once it is played, it directly gives the Indian netizens who are confident in honey juice to break the defense, in the Indian domestic network, there are Indian netizens who break their mouths and scold, and there are netizens who try to prove that "this is not the Indian army", and Indian netizens take out the stills of the divine drama "Galwan Valley" that is being filmed as "evidence", making a bigger joke.
In fact, I think that the public opinion war, the public opinion war, is not as simple as a war of words and a war of words, and it is far from enough to rely on diplomatic spokesmen alone! Our strategic intentions, strategic deployments, and campaign actions must be three-dimensional, systematic, and clear, and we must not excessively and one-sidedly rely on deletions and deletions, keyword searches, or even evade online public opinion. A frenzied deletion will not only create contradictions, but also create excuses for anti-China forces at home and abroad. In the face of the flames and smoke in the ideological field, we can only choose to launch a clear-cut and tit-for-tat network debate! It is reasonable, advantageous, and restrained to seize the commanding heights of ideology and the opportunity of public opinion!
For example, india's largest print media, which is relatively calm in its relations with China, pointed out that "there is no evidence that there was a confrontation between China and India at the end of September", and there is no evidence that "chinese soldiers have been captured", calling on India not to listen to the wind and rain.
However, in the 13th round of military commander-level meetings on the China-India border, our army put forward a direct warning to the Indian army: "Proceeding from the overall situation of safeguarding the relations between the two militaries of China and India, the Chinese side has made great efforts to promote the relaxation and cooling of the border situation and fully demonstrated its sincerity, but the Indian side still adheres to unreasonable and unrealistic demands, which has added difficulties to the negotiations." China's determination and will to safeguard national sovereignty are unswerving, and I hope that the Indian side will not misjudge the situation, cherish the current hard-won situation in the China-India border area, abide by the relevant agreements and agreements and consensus between the two countries and two militaries, and earnestly show sincerity and action to work with the Chinese side to jointly safeguard peace and tranquility in the border area. What this shows is that our army is already very dissatisfied with the Indian army, and it is looking at the Indian army with a kind of foolish look, and if the Indian army talks about chaos again, the next step may be "shaking the mountain.".
So, what is the situation of the so-called "China-India border confrontation incident", how can the Indian army stick to us like a brown candy and can't shake it off, and what kind of response strategy should we take in the sino-Indian border area in the future? According to the information released by the Western Theater, the "extraneous branches" of the Sino-Indian border this time occurred on the eastern line of the Sino-Indian border and in the Dongzhang area of southern Tibet in China. This place is located in The Shannan Region of the Tibet Autonomous Region of China, the famous tourist attraction Dongzhang Waterfall is located here, for a long time, the encroachment and anti-encroachment struggle in the Dongzhang area has always been very fierce, such as the deep pool in front of the Dongzhang Waterfall, due to the encroachment action of the Indian army more than 20 years ago, blocking the normal pilgrimage activities of our border people. For example, the Dogol pasture in Langbo Township, Dongzhang Region, was also affected by the outages built by the Indian army more than 20 years ago to take advantage of the lack of Preparation of the Chinese border guards.
Over the years, the encroachment and anti-encroachment, propaganda and counter-propaganda actions of the two sides in the Dongzhang area can be described as continuous, but after 2016, China directly gave India a trick to draw a salary: in the Dongzhang area, large-scale poverty alleviation work was launched, and new constant temperature housing, solar power generation equipment and heating and heating equipment were built for the border people, not to mention the contrast with the residential houses of the pseudo-"Arunachal" opposite, and even exceeded the indian army's outposts on the opposite side. Since then, they have desperately wanted to find us some trouble in the border area, and the border struggle in the Eastern Zhang region has also been complicated again, but because the rule of India in the eastern section of the Sino-Indian border is not stable, a large number of mobile troops must be used to suppress the resistance of the indigenous people in the east, and the field troops under the Eastern Command are not as strong as the Northern Command, so the border struggle on this side is still slightly calmer than in the western section.
However, even if it is a little calmer, whether it is in the east or the west, the temper of the Indians gives us a relatively consistent impression, that is, "donkey", both stubborn and sharp, and a little bit of shameless virtue: let's talk about the western section, let's ask which unit can make the news of the Battle of the Galwan Valley starting from Last May, in front of the border guards of the Chinese People's Liberation Army, which can still make the news of the Battle of the Galwan Valley. And what kind of spirit is it to make the Battle of the Galwan Valley, the countless casualties of its own soldiers and the capture of countless people, basically reimbursed half a battalion, in order to blow their big defeat into a big victory, and even to give this 16th battalion of the Bihar United a title of "Batman of the Night". From here, we can see that the weapons and tactics of the Indian army do not seem to be very good, and the quality of the soldiers is even worse, but the degree of cheekiness has reached a very rare point.
However, the temper of the Indian donkey, although it has some of its national characteristics, but on the whole, it is still determined by the "big climate" in India and the "microclimate" in the border areas: speaking of the general climate in India, in recent years, Modi LaoXian is increasingly deviating from the established international relations strategy of non-alignment, between the two major power groups, trying not to offend China, and more and more inclined to kidnap India on the us chariot. Although India's behavior of "getting on the American car" has always been less obvious, there have been repeated and tentative, but India has bound its national strategy with the Us Indo-Pacific strategy, and tries to ask the United States for credit and gain benefits from the United States by making enemies with China and even touching China. Therefore, whether it is the confrontation incident in Pangong Lake, the Tiannan River Valley, and the Galwan River Valley in the western section of the Sino-Indian border in the middle of last year, or the porcelain collision incident of the Indian army in the Dongzhang region this year, from the perspective of the international environment, it is just another firepower test by India against us, and the purpose of the test is to "live out the united front value" in front of Western countries, especially the United States.
Judging from the "microclimate" in the border area, in fact, it is said that some senior generals in the Indian border area still have a certain understanding of the gap in national strength between China and India, and their attitude on the Sino-Indian border is basically that encroachment can be encroached upon, but when encountering Chinese, it is still the best policy to come and not to have a direct conflict with the Chinese army. However, some lower-level and lower-level officers, especially the Indian army's division-level to battalion-level (in fact, small regimental level) first-level officers, are extremely eager to have some military conflicts with China, and regardless of whether the conflict is won or lost, they can add themselves to the rank of knight anyway. For example, Colonel Babo, commander of the 16th Battalion of the Bihar Wing, who was killed on the spot by our army last year, would have been promoted to the post of chief of staff or even deputy brigade commander of the brigade after the battle in the Galwan Valley, and it is precisely because it is "profitable" that these officers of the Indian army's young and strong faction behaved very crazy on the Sino-Indian border, which has the "legacy" of the Japanese Showa staff officers of that year. The presence of these people has in fact become the biggest destabilizing factor in the situation on the Sino-Indian border.
How should we deal with the current "big climate" between China and India and the "microclimate" on the Sino-Indian border? In fact, the method is relatively simple, since the Indian army wants to fight for its own more people in the border areas, and the troop allocation is more to give us some friction and some cannibalism, then we will not give play to the advantages of our own infrastructure madness and give play to the advantages of our army's light mechanization and high mobility, and we will be too sorry for the Indian army. Therefore, in the border areas, the best way for our army to deal with them is the strategy adopted after the Doklam crisis, building a large number of high-standard strategic roads in the border areas, building a large number of preset garrison points, fortress areas, firepower launch points, etc., relying on technical strength to defuse India's man-sea tactics, so as to ensure that our side is invincible in the border struggle.