The "reversal of cases" about movies and TV series is also not uncommon, and some of them are correct, such as Qiong Yao dramas, most of which are not correct.
But there are also some things that are confusing, such as jack and Ruth in "Titanic", which is regarded by most people as a classic romance.
Now some people have ridiculed her three views are not correct, Ruth is engaged but cheating, and Jack, a poor boy, seduces rich ladies and destroys people's families, and even some people compare Ruth with Pan Jinlian.
Although after people grow up, they can indeed come to different conclusions by looking back at some things with adult eyes, but similar to this concept of stealing, it is inevitable that some classic things must be smeared to show their differences, and it is inevitable that it is a bit noisy.
It's a simple truth, because even if you have seriously watched the titanic film, the vast majority of people will not have such a strange argument.
The film makes it clear that Ruth has no love for her fiancé at all, and that the marriage was also run by her mother, and she has no autonomy in it.
Even in the end she went to commit suicide in order to escape her marriage, but fortunately Jack was at the bow of the ship and saved her.
That is to say, without Jack, Ruth would have become the food of the Atlantic sharks, and there would be no such thing as cheating or seducing.
Why would Ruth rather die than marry her fiancé? Not only because she didn't love him, but more importantly, whether she was sold or sold by her own mother.
This marriage was handled by her mother, and the reason was not that "the other party is a rich family, I hope my daughter is good."
She just wants to marry her daughter to a rich man and let herself continue to maintain this "aristocratic life", as for whether her daughter likes it or not, whether her daughter is happy after marriage, she is not bothered to reason.
To put it bluntly, what is the difference between this and selling a daughter?
And when Ruth resists her, she will also scold Ruth for being selfish.
Because you don't want to give up this aristocratic life, your daughter's happiness is not important? Your daughter is a cargo? It doesn't matter what she thinks? Who the hell is selfish?
In this case, the so-called engagement is a joke at all, because the marriage contract is originally against Ruth's will.
But even so, there are still many people who like to stand on the moral high ground and criticize, saying that no matter what the reason, since you Ruth is engaged, you should be at ease with your husband.
As for Jack, it is even more interesting, some people call him a junior, interfering in other people's marriages, destroying other people's families.
But in fact? According to Ruth herself in the movie, she believes that Jack saved himself, pulled himself out of the mire from body and mind, and even if he is no longer there, he is still always in his heart.
Because Ruth's so-called engagement is against her will, she is equivalent to a goods that will be sold by her mother, and Jack also knows this clearly before approaching her, rather than saying that the family is harmonious and happy, but Jack can't help but intervene when he sees his wife beautiful.
After falling in love with Jack, Ruth finally bravely says no to this manipulated fate, and she finally looks like a person rather than a commodity bought and sold by the nobility.
There are always some people who like to hold the "even if you are a party, I don't want you to feel, what you think doesn't count, I want me to feel, what I think is the truth." "This kind of thinking.
So the question is, why are there some people who are keen to stand on the high ground and criticize Jack and Ruth?
Their ideas are not difficult to guess.
The reason why some men criticize them is that there are more men and fewer women in China now, and many marriages belong to the type of "making up their lives", and it is difficult for women to say how much love they have for their other half, let alone selling daughters and other things.
In the eyes of these men, if everyone agrees with Ruth, wouldn't it be more difficult to find a wife?
So we must use morality to firmly occupy the high point, once you have a marriage contract, even if you are not married, it is better, not to mention whether you are sold, it does not matter whether you love me or not, let alone whether you want to marry or not, anyway, you must follow me.
Some women criticize them for even more interesting reasons, to put it bluntly, a very popular saying: "I would rather sit in a BMW and cry than sit on a bicycle and laugh."
In the setting of the story, Jack is a handsome but only draw poor boy, other than that there is basically nothing, the conditions are very poor, the only thing is the sincere love that dies for Ruth and never frowns.
And Ruth's fiancé? The appearance is not low, rich and powerful, rich and powerful, and the social status is high, and you can give Ruth a valuable necklace at any time, marry him, and the material aspect is absolutely perfect.
Many of the women who criticize Jack Ruth's pair belong to this kind of person who put themselves into Ruth, and they think that Ruth is really Shi Lezhi, a good big family, and runs to a poor painter to live and die.
What if I changed myself? It doesn't matter if it's done by his mother, and don't care if he loves him or not, he will definitely marry a big rich and powerful family anyway.
For this kind of woman who "objectified" herself into a commodity, it is also expected that she does not understand Ruth's relationship with Jack, but it is really helpless to openly hold this value high.
I have to say that times are always changing, and so are values.
More than 20 years ago, everyone believed in those sincere loves.
Twenty years later, the blow to society has caused many people to start giving up on their original ideas, and because of the change in values, some people have slandered what they once believed.
Perhaps now more people agree that "husband and wife are originally the same forest bird, and the great trouble is about to fly separately", but please believe that there is also a "you jump, I jump" he/she in this world.
Many people may not meet this him/her in their lifetime, but there is no need to erase or even stigmatize this existence because they can't meet it, or choose another path.