Everyone will talk about the big truth, what is needed is to be reasonable, and it is not advisable to judge Lao Hu as an excuse for the murderer

Lao Hu's article that excuses the murderer has attracted many dissatisfactions, and the most representative rebuttal is that he does not know the suffering of others, and does not persuade others to be good.

First of all, is the old nonsense correct? That's for sure, but everyone understands that. Who does not know the role of the law, even if the specific law is not clear, at least the karma of good and evil is still known. Killing people is the result of evil, but blindly emphasizing its evil without exploring its causes is where everyone has an opinion.

There are many reasons for killing people, and as far as seeking revenge is concerned, no one is going to kill people from the beginning, they must have come to that point step by step. That is to say, if one of these links can be dredged, there will be no final tragedy. Therefore, why these links cannot be dredged, this is the problem to be paid attention to and discussed. If you just warn that it is wrong to kill people like Lao Hu, and do not untangle the knots in your heart, then the same thing is likely to be the same result in the future.

In fact, the so-called excuse for the murderer is more to explore the cause of the killing, find out the extenuating circumstances, and warn and channel, so as to try to avoid similar tragedies in the future. Instead of reducing the understanding of the nature of killing, this recognizes the evolution of killing, which is conducive to better work in the future.

The case of Zhang Buckle to avenge his mother. Should we pay more attention to his final murder or the humiliation of his mother before him? We can learn about the case by homicide and warn the murderer of the price he must pay, but how much punishment can be given to the evil cause of his mother's humiliation? And that's the real source of social unrest.

Returning to the putian Ouzhong murder case, in the same way, should we pay attention to the punishment of killing or the cause of killing? Since the old nonsense said the word exoneration, then natural people must have a reason for exoneration, and there must be something reasonable about it. Since it involves reason, it should be clearly understood, so that it can be referred to and borrowed in the future. The order of society depends on the law, but the temperature of society depends on emotion. If we always say it with a big truth that is not self-evident, what is the significance of it? It is no wonder that some people say that this is an officialdom.

This is actually to look at the people simply. The progress of society lies not only in the understanding of right and wrong, but also on the right and wrong of the details, which is the truth of governing the country like cooking small fresh.

Finally, the recent adoption by the United Nations of a draft on the death penalty, although biased, is at least one thing worth affirming, that is, the death penalty must be cautious and irreparable once executed. Where is caution? One of the points is to fully sort out the causes of the killing and avoid the death penalty becoming another regret.